| Literature DB >> 28159733 |
Tie Zheng Hou1, Nisha Verma1, Jennifer Wanders1, Alan Kennedy1, Blagoje Soskic1, Daniel Janman1, Neil Halliday1, Behzad Rowshanravan1, Austen Worth2, Waseem Qasim2, Helen Baxendale3, Hans Stauss1, Suranjith Seneviratne4, Olaf Neth5, Peter Olbrich5, Sophie Hambleton6, Peter D Arkwright7, Siobhan O Burns1, Lucy S K Walker1, David M Sansom1.
Abstract
Heterozygous CTLA-4 deficiency has been reported as a monogenic cause of common variable immune deficiency with features of immune dysregulation. Direct mutation in CTLA-4 leads to defective regulatory T-cell (Treg) function associated with impaired ability to control levels of the CTLA-4 ligands, CD80 and CD86. However, additional mutations affecting the CTLA-4 pathway, such as those recently reported for LRBA, indirectly affect CTLA-4 expression, resulting in clinically similar disorders. Robust phenotyping approaches sensitive to defects in the CTLA-4 pathway are therefore required to inform understanding of such immune dysregulation syndromes. Here, we describe assays capable of distinguishing a variety of defects in the CTLA-4 pathway. Assessing total CTLA-4 expression levels was found to be optimal when restricting analysis to the CD45RA-Foxp3+ fraction. CTLA-4 induction following stimulation, and the use of lysosomal-blocking compounds, distinguished CTLA-4 from LRBA mutations. Short-term T-cell stimulation improved the capacity for discriminating the Foxp3+ Treg compartment, clearly revealing Treg expansions in these disorders. Finally, we developed a functionally orientated assay to measure ligand uptake by CTLA-4, which is sensitive to ligand-binding or -trafficking mutations, that would otherwise be difficult to detect and that is appropriate for testing novel mutations in CTLA-4 pathway genes. These approaches are likely to be of value in interpreting the functional significance of mutations in the CTLA-4 pathway identified by gene-sequencing approaches.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28159733 PMCID: PMC5438243 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-745174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113