David M Livermore1,2, Shazad Mushtaq1, Marina Warner1, Anna Vickers1, Neil Woodford1. 1. Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit, Public Health England National Infection Service, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK. 2. Floor 2, Bob Champion Research & Educational Building, James Watson Road, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.
Abstract
Objectives: Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) inhibit class A, class C and some class D β-lactamases. A few also bind PBP2, conferring direct antibacterial activity and a β-lactamase-independent 'enhancer' effect, potentiating β-lactams targeting PBP3. We tested a novel DBO, zidebactam, combined with cefepime. Methods: CLSI agar dilution MICs were determined with cefepime/zidebactam in a chequerboard format. Bactericidal activity was also measured. Results: Zidebactam MICs were ≤2 mg/L (mostly 0.12-0.5 mg/L) for most Escherichia coli , Klebsiella , Citrobacter and Enterobacter spp., but were >32 mg/L for Proteeae, most Serratia and a few E. coli , Klebsiella and Enterobacter/Citrobacter . The antibacterial activity of zidebactam dominated chequerboard studies for Enterobacteriaceae, but potentiation of cefepime was apparent for zidebactam-resistant isolates with class A and C enzymes, illustrating β-lactamase inhibition. Overall, cefepime/zidebactam inhibited almost all Enterobacteriaceae with AmpC, ESBL, K1, KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases at 1 + 1 mg/L and also 29 of 35 isolates with metallo-carbapenemases, including several resistant to zidebactam alone. Zidebactam MICs for 36 of 50 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 4-16 mg/L, and the majority of AmpC, metallo-β-lactamase-producing and cystic fibrosis isolates were susceptible to cefepime/zidebactam at 8 + 8 mg/L. Zidebactam MICs for Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were >32 mg/L; potentiation of cefepime was frequent for S. maltophilia , but minimal for A. baumannii . Kill curve results largely supported MICs. Conclusions: Zidebactam represents a second triple-action DBO following RG6080, with lower MICs for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa . Clinical evaluation of cefepime/zidebactam must critically evaluate the reliance that can be placed on this direct antibacterial activity and on the enhancer effect as well as β-lactamase inhibition.
Objectives:Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs) inhibit class A, class C and some class D β-lactamases. A few also bind PBP2, conferring direct antibacterial activity and a β-lactamase-independent 'enhancer' effect, potentiating β-lactams targeting PBP3. We tested a novel DBO, zidebactam, combined with cefepime. Methods: CLSI agar dilution MICs were determined with cefepime/zidebactam in a chequerboard format. Bactericidal activity was also measured. Results:Zidebactam MICs were ≤2 mg/L (mostly 0.12-0.5 mg/L) for most Escherichia coli , Klebsiella , Citrobacter and Enterobacter spp., but were >32 mg/L for Proteeae, most Serratia and a few E. coli , Klebsiella and Enterobacter/Citrobacter . The antibacterial activity of zidebactam dominated chequerboard studies for Enterobacteriaceae, but potentiation of cefepime was apparent for zidebactam-resistant isolates with class A and C enzymes, illustrating β-lactamase inhibition. Overall, cefepime/zidebactam inhibited almost all Enterobacteriaceae with AmpC, ESBL, K1, KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases at 1 + 1 mg/L and also 29 of 35 isolates with metallo-carbapenemases, including several resistant to zidebactam alone. Zidebactam MICs for 36 of 50 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 4-16 mg/L, and the majority of AmpC, metallo-β-lactamase-producing and cystic fibrosis isolates were susceptible to cefepime/zidebactam at 8 + 8 mg/L. Zidebactam MICs for Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were >32 mg/L; potentiation of cefepime was frequent for S. maltophilia , but minimal for A. baumannii . Kill curve results largely supported MICs. Conclusions: Zidebactam represents a second triple-action DBO following RG6080, with lower MICs for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa . Clinical evaluation of cefepime/zidebactam must critically evaluate the reliance that can be placed on this direct antibacterial activity and on the enhancer effect as well as β-lactamase inhibition.
Authors: Thomas F Durand-Réville; Satenig Guler; Janelle Comita-Prevoir; Brendan Chen; Neil Bifulco; Hoan Huynh; Sushmita Lahiri; Adam B Shapiro; Sarah M McLeod; Nicole M Carter; Samir H Moussa; Camilo Velez-Vega; Nelson B Olivier; Robert McLaughlin; Ning Gao; Jason Thresher; Tiffany Palmer; Beth Andrews; Robert A Giacobbe; Joseph V Newman; David E Ehmann; Boudewijn de Jonge; John O'Donnell; John P Mueller; Rubén A Tommasi; Alita A Miller Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Bartolome Moya; Isabel M Barcelo; Sachin Bhagwat; Mahesh Patel; German Bou; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Robert A Bonomo; Antonio Oliver Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: James A Karlowsky; Meredith A Hackel; Samuel K Bouchillon; Daniel F Sahm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 5.191