Aims: It is unclear whether the potential benefits of physical activity differ according to level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) or strength. The aim of this study was to determine whether the association between physical activity and mortality is moderated by CRF and grip strength sufficiently to inform health promotion strategies. Methods and Results: 498 135 participants (54.7% women) from the UK Biobank were included (CRF data available in 67 702 participants). Exposure variables were grip strength, CRF, and physical activity. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events were the outcomes. 8591 died over median 4.9 years [IQR 4.3–5.5] follow-up. There was a significant interaction between total physical activity and grip strength (P < 0.0001) whereby the higher hazard of mortality associated with lower physical activity was greatest among participants in the lowest tertile for grip strength (hazard ratio, HR:1.11 [95% CI 1.09–1.14]) and lowest among those in the highest grip strength tertile (HR:1.04 [1.01–1.08]). The interaction with CRF did not reach statistical significance but the pattern was similar. The association between physical activity and mortality was larger among those in the lowest tertile of CRF (HR:1.13 [1.02–1.26]) than those in the highest (HR:1.03 [0.91–1.16]). The pattern for CVD events was similar. Conclusions: These data provide novel evidence that strength, and possibly CRF, moderate the association between physical activity and mortality. The association between physical activity and mortality is strongest in those with the lowest strength (which is easily measured), and the lowest CRF, suggesting that these sub-groups could benefit most from interventions to increase physical activity.
Aims: It is unclear whether the potential benefits of physical activity differ according to level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) or strength. The aim of this study was to determine whether the association between physical activity and mortality is moderated by CRF and grip strength sufficiently to inform health promotion strategies. Methods and Results: 498 135 participants (54.7% women) from the UK Biobank were included (CRF data available in 67 702 participants). Exposure variables were grip strength, CRF, and physical activity. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events were the outcomes. 8591 died over median 4.9 years [IQR 4.3–5.5] follow-up. There was a significant interaction between total physical activity and grip strength (P < 0.0001) whereby the higher hazard of mortality associated with lower physical activity was greatest among participants in the lowest tertile for grip strength (hazard ratio, HR:1.11 [95% CI 1.09–1.14]) and lowest among those in the highest grip strength tertile (HR:1.04 [1.01–1.08]). The interaction with CRF did not reach statistical significance but the pattern was similar. The association between physical activity and mortality was larger among those in the lowest tertile of CRF (HR:1.13 [1.02–1.26]) than those in the highest (HR:1.03 [0.91–1.16]). The pattern for CVD events was similar. Conclusions: These data provide novel evidence that strength, and possibly CRF, moderate the association between physical activity and mortality. The association between physical activity and mortality is strongest in those with the lowest strength (which is easily measured), and the lowest CRF, suggesting that these sub-groups could benefit most from interventions to increase physical activity.
Authors: Brian D Duscha; Cris A Slentz; Johanna L Johnson; Joseph A Houmard; Daniel R Bensimhon; Kenneth J Knetzger; William E Kraus Journal: Chest Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Richard W Bohannon; Susan R Magasi; Deborah J Bubela; Ying-Chih Wang; Richard C Gershon Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Carlos A Celis-Morales; Francisco Perez-Bravo; Luis Ibañez; Carlos Salas; Mark E S Bailey; Jason M R Gill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C A Celis-Morales; D M Lyall; S R Gray; L Steell; J Anderson; S Iliodromiti; P Welsh; Y Guo; F Petermann; D F Mackay; M E S Bailey; J P Pell; J M R Gill; N Sattar Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Kate A Duchowny; Sarah F Ackley; Willa D Brenowitz; Jingxuan Wang; Scott C Zimmerman; Michelle R Caunca; M Maria Glymour Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Dong Hoon Lee; Leandro F M Rezende; Gerson Ferrari; Dagfinn Aune; NaNa Keum; Fred K Tabung; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Joanne McPeake; Theodore J Iwashyna; Philip Henderson; Alastair H Leyland; Daniel Mackay; Tara Quasim; Matthew Walters; Michael Harhay; Martin Shaw Journal: Lancet Reg Health Eur Date: 2021-07
Authors: Jari A Laukkanen; Ari Voutilainen; Sudhir Kurl; Claudio Gil S Araujo; Sae Young Jae; Setor K Kunutsor Journal: Ann Med Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.348
Authors: Miroslava Rabajdova; Ivana Spakova; Aurel Zelko; Jaroslav Rosenberger; Peter Kolarcik; Vladimira Sobolova; Daniel Pella; Maria Marekova; Andrea Madarasova Geckova Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2021-05