| Literature DB >> 28158277 |
Correction: Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.
Beat P Müller-Stich, Hannes G Kenngott, Matthias Gondan, Christian Stock, Georg R Linke, Franziska Fritz, Felix Nickel, Markus K Diener, Carsten N Gutt, Moritz Wente, Markus W Büchler, Lars Fischer.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139547.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID： 28158277 PMCID： PMC5291359 DOI： 10.1371/journal.pone.0171865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN： 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 4Meta-analysis of A) hernia recurrence and B) complications after LMAH and LH.
Black rectangles are randomized controlled trials; dark gray rectangles are case control studies; light gray rectangles are case series with control group. LMAH, laparoscopic mesh augmented hiatoplasty; LH, laparoscopic hiatoplasty; OR, Odds Ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Studies included in the meta-analysis are detailed in the supporting information files (S1 Table).
Meta-analysis of A) hernia recurrence and B) complications after LMAH and LH.
Review 1. Use of Mesh in Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis and Risk-Benefit Analysis.
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240