Literature DB >> 28157510

A Reply to "MNase-Sensitive Complexes in Yeast: Nucleosomes and Non-histone Barriers," by Chereji et al.

Slawomir Kubik1, Maria Jessica Bruzzone1, Benjamin Albert1, David Shore2.   

Abstract

In this issue of Molecular Cell, Chereji et al. (2017) present new data on MNase-sensitive particles previously identified upstream of transcription start sites at many promoters in budding yeast, and they argue, based upon negative histone-ChIP results, that they are non-nucleosomal signals generated by transcription factors (TFs). We show instead, based upon functional experiments where the relevant TFs are rapidly depleted, that this explanation does not hold, and we argue instead that histone ChIP and chemical cleavage assays have a limited capacity to capture these highly dynamic, MNase-sensitive "fragile" nucleosomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28157510     DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  10 in total

1.  Proteomic characterization of the arsenic response locus in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kirk L West; Stephanie D Byrum; Samuel G Mackintosh; Rick D Edmondson; Sean D Taverna; Alan J Tackett
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 2.  Major Determinants of Nucleosome Positioning.

Authors:  Răzvan V Chereji; David J Clark
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  MNase, as a probe to study the sequence-dependent site exposures in the +1 nucleosomes of yeast.

Authors:  Di Luo; Daiki Kato; Jumpei Nogami; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Hidetoshi Kono
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  RSC-Associated Subnucleosomes Define MNase-Sensitive Promoters in Yeast.

Authors:  Sandipan Brahma; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Linking the dynamics of chromatin occupancy and transcription with predictive models.

Authors:  Trung Q Tran; Heather K MacAlpine; Vinay Tripuraneni; Sneha Mitra; David M MacAlpine; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Role of cell-type specific nucleosome positioning in inducible activation of mammalian promoters.

Authors:  Simona Saccani; Dominic van Essen; Agata Oruba
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Interplay among ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodelers Determines Chromatin Organisation in Yeast.

Authors:  Hemant K Prajapati; Josefina Ocampo; David J Clark
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25

8.  A deformation energy model reveals sequence-dependent property of nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Guoqing Liu; Hongyu Zhao; Hu Meng; Yongqiang Xing; Lu Cai
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Parallel mapping with site-directed hydroxyl radicals and micrococcal nuclease reveals structural features of positioned nucleosomes in vivo.

Authors:  Tomohiro Fuse; Koji Katsumata; Koya Morohoshi; Yukio Mukai; Yuichi Ichikawa; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Akio Yanagida; Takeshi Urano; Hiroaki Kato; Mitsuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Transcriptional control of ribosome biogenesis in yeast: links to growth and stress signals.

Authors:  David Shore; Sevil Zencir; Benjamin Albert
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.407

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.