Literature DB >> 28157218

Expanded safety analysis of pevonedistat, a first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

R T Swords1, J Watts1, H P Erba2, J K Altman3, M Maris4, F Anwer5, Z Hua6, H Stein6, H Faessel6, F Sedarati6, B J Dezube6, F J Giles3, B C Medeiros7, D J DeAngelo8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28157218      PMCID: PMC5386335          DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Cancer J        ISSN: 2044-5385            Impact factor:   11.037


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sir, We previously reported the therapeutic potential of pevonedistat (TAK-924/MLN4924), a novel inhibitor of protein neddylation, in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).[1] Pevonedistat is a small-molecule inhibitor of the neural cell developmentally downregulated 8 (NEDD8)-activating enzyme, which processes NEDD8 for binding to target substrates.[2, 3, 4, 5] The most characterized NEDD8 target in cells are the Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases (CRLs), which direct the degradation of specific substrates through the proteasome (for example, p27, CDT1, Nrf-2).[6] In the absence of NEDD8, CRL substrates accumulate causing antiproliferative effects in AML.[1] In a phase I trial (C15003 study), patients with relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndrome or AML were treated with 1-h infusions of pevonedistat every 21 or 28 days across five schedules. On Schedule A, dose escalation commenced at 25 mg/m2 on Days 1, 3 and 5 in a standard ‘3+3' manner to determine the maimum tolerated dose (MTD). Following this, four additional schedules were evaluated with pevonedistat: Schedule B (Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 starting at 147 mg/m2); Schedule C (Days 1, 8 and 15 starting one dose level lower than the MTD determined for Schedule A (44 mg/m2)); Schedule D (Days 1, 3 and 5 stating at 45 mg/m2 to be combined with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on Days 1–5 and 8–9); and Schedule E (Days 1, 3 and 5 at fixed dose of 50 mg/m2). Schedules A–C and E were administered every 21 days, whereas schedule D was administered every 28 days. Adverse events (AEs) on Schedules A and B were taken into account when designing Schedules C–E; based on Schedule A MTD, an expansion dose of 50 mg/m2 was selected for Schedule E. Results for Schedules A and B were published by Swords et al.,[7] and the reported MTDs were 59 and 83 mg/m2, respectively. Hepatotoxicity was dose limiting for Schedule A and multiorgan failure (MOF) for Schedule B. The objective response rate in patients treated at or below the MTD was 17% for Schedule A and 10% for Schedule B, confirming single agent activity in refractory AML patients.[8] Considering the promising safety and activity of pevonedistat reported thus far,[8, 9, 10] we carried out a comprehensive safety analysis of all 72 patients treated across five schedules (A–E) in the C15003 study. Seventy-two patients were evaluable for toxicity: Schedule A (n=27), Schedule B (n=26), Schedule C (n=2), Schedule D (n=1), and Schedule E (n=16). Most patients had AML (N=66, 92%), 5 had myelodysplastic syndrome (7%) and 1 patient had ALL (1%). Median age was 65.5 years (range: 19–84). The most frequently reported all-grade AEs were: pyrexia (49%), diarrhea (43%), decreased appetite (35%), peripheral edema (33%), dyspnea and fatigue (each 32%), febrile neutropenia (31%) and nausea (31%). These were generally mild and transient. The most common reported laboratory toxicities were elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (25%) and alanine transaminase (24%). Treatment-related myelosuppression was infrequent with thrombocytopenia reported in 18% of patients. Fifteen (21%) patients discontinued the study owing to AEs (Table 1). Overall, 56 (78%) patients experienced at least 1 serious adverse event (SAE): Schedule A=20 (74%), Schedule B=20 (77%), Schedule C=2 (100%), Schedule D=1 (100%), and Schedule E=13 (81%). The most common SAE overall was febrile neutropenia reported in 17 (24%) patients (A=8, B=6 and E=3). Other SAEs occurring in >2 patients were pneumonia (n=12, 17%), disease progression (n=9, 13%), fever (n=6, 8%), sepsis (n=6, 8%), intracranial hemorrhage (n=5, 7%), hypotension (n=4, 6%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n=3, 4%) and mental status changes (n=3, 4%). There were 28 (39%) on-study deaths and 4 of these deaths were due to sepsis (1 patient on Schedule A at 78 mg/m2), MOF (2 patients on Schedule B at 110 mg/m2 and 147 mg/m2) and cardiopulmonary failure related to leukastasis (1 patient on Schedule D at 45 mg/m2). Eighteen deaths, including three of the four deaths due to MOF/cardiopulmonary failure occurred during Cycle 1. The on-study deaths unrelated to pevonedistat (n=24) occurred owing to underlying disease (n=11), sepsis (n=3), intracranial hemorrhage (n=5), pneumonia (n=3), and 1 case each of pulmonary hemorrhage and pancytopenia.
Table 1

Treatment-emergent adverse events (AE)

AE, n (%)Schedule Aa (n=27)Schedule B (n=26)Schedule C (n=2)Schedule D (n=1)Schedule E (n=16)Total (n=72)
Any AEb27 (100)26 (100)2 (100)1 (100)16 (100)72 (100)
 Pyrexia12 (44)16 (62)007 (44)35 (49)
 Diarrhea14 (52)9 (35)2 (100)06 (38)31 (43)
 Anorexia11 (41)7 (27)1 (50)06 (38)25 (35)
 Peripheral edema11 (41)6 (23)1 (50)06 (38)24 (33)
 Fatigue9 (33)9 (35)005 (31)23 (32)
 Dyspnea6 (22)10 (38)01 (100)6 (38)23 (32)
 FN11 (41)8 (31)003 (19)22 (31)
 Nausea10 (37)7 (27)005 (31)22 (31)
 Chills8 (30)11 (42)001 (6)20 (28)
 Dizziness11 (41)4 (15)1 (50)04 (25)20 (28)
 Myalgia8 (30)7 (27)1 (50)04 (25)20 (28)
 Increased AST9 (33)3 (12)1 (50)05 (31)18 (25)
 Increased ALT8 (30)4 (15)1 (50)04 (25)17 (24)
 Headache5 (19)7 (27)1 (50)04 (25)17 (24)
 Epistaxis6 (22)6 (23)005 (31)17 (24)
 Vomiting8 (30)5 (19)1 (50)02 (13)16 (22)
 Cough7 (26)6 (23)002 (13)15 (21)
 Pneumonia5 (19)4 (15)2 (100)04 (25)15 (21)
Any treatment-related grade ⩾3 AEc16 (59)20 (77)2 (100)1 (100)12 (75)51 (71)
 Low platelets2 (7)2 (8)0004 (6)
 MI01 (4)01 (100)02 (3)
 FNd02 (8)0002 (3)
 Increased AST2 (7)00002 (3)
 Increased ALT1 (4)0001 (6)2 (3)
 Increased bilirubin01 (4)001 (6)2 (3)
 Hypoxia1 (4)1 (4)0002 (3)
 Hypotension1 (4)1 (4)0002 (3)
 MOF02 (8)0002 (3)
 Fatigue2 (7)00002 (3)

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; FN, febrile neutropenial; MI, myocardial infarction; MOF, multiorgan failure.

Schdeule A (dose escalation cohort, Days 1, 3, 5); Schedule B (dose escalation cohort, Days 1, 4, 8, 11); Schedule C (weekly dosing schedule); Schedule D (combination with azacitidine); Schedule E (dose expansion cohort, Days 1, 3, 5).

Any AE occurring in >20% of patients overall.

Any treatment-related grade ⩾3 AE occurring in >1 patient overall.

Bacteremia occurred in a total of 3 patients on study (1 on Schedule A and 2 on Schedule E) (4%) and septic shock in 1 patient on Schedule C (1%); these events were reported as not related to pevonedistat.

Overall, there were 10 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in 6 patients: transaminase elevation (Schedule A, 78 mg/m2); orthostatic hypotension (Schedule B, 110 mg/m2); cardiac failure (Schedule B, 147 mg/m2); MOF (Schedule B, 147 mg/m2); rash (Schedule E, 50 mg/m2); and elevated alanine transaminase (Schedule E, 50 mg/m2). With the exception of 1 DLT, all events occurred within 2 days of first exposure to pevonedistat. There were no DLTs at doses <50 mg/m2, and all Grade 4 DLTs occurred at the highest dose of pevonedistat administered (147 mg/m2). Mean pevonedistat plasma concentration–time profiles obtained on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (and Cycle 3 on Schedule E) are shown in Figure 1. No obvious differences in exposures were observed between Cycles 1 and 3, suggesting that pevonedistat PK remains stationary over time. Of the 55 response evaluable patients, there were 2 complete remissions (4%) on Schedule A, and 5 partial remissions (9%) across Schedule A (n=2), Schedule B (n=2) and Schedule E (n=1). The overall complete remission/partial remission rate was 13%. Thirty-four patients (62%) had stable disease after treatment with ⩾4 courses of pevonedistat (Schedule A=14, Schedule B=13, Schedule E=7). All responses were in patients with AML.
Figure 1

Mean pevonedistat plasma concentration–time profiles. Serial samples were obtained on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (and Day 1 of Cycle 3 on Schedule E) following a 1-h intravenous infusion and presented graphically (linear and semi-log plots, left and right panels, respectively).

The principal serious and potentially drug-related toxicities noted in this trial were hepatotoxicity and sepsis syndromes with MOF. The exact mechanisms accounting for the hepatotoxicity observed in some patients treated with pevonedistat is unclear. In vitro RNA interference to disrupt NEDD8 conjugation induces shape changes in HEK293 and HeLa cells (edema and swelling). This effect may relate to the accumulation of the cullin-dependent GTPase RhoA, which regulates cytoskeleton proteins.[11] This effect is reproducible with pevonedistat treatment in vitro and is reversible by RhoA knockdown. It is interesting to speculate that transient leakage of transaminases from edematous hepatocytes in treated patients may have accounted for some of the laboratory toxicities observed in this study. A more compelling perspective on pevonedistat-induced liver toxicity was presented by Wolenski et al.,[12] who demonstrated that treatment with pevonedistat lowered the activation threshold for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated cell death, by conferring cellular sensitivity to low concentrations of TNF-α. Patients with higher circulating levels of TNF-α (typically the case during sepsis) treated with pevonedistat in our study may have been more prone to the tissue-damaging effects of this cytokine. This mechanism may have contributed to the MOF events observed. It should be noted that MOF was rare in this trial and commonly occurred in heavily pretreated AML patients treated at higher doses of pevonedistat (other than the 1 patient on Schedule D (45 mg/m2) who died of MOF from leukostasis, there were no MOF events at doses of pevonedistat ⩽83 mg/m2). In order to study potential links with cytokine signaling and systemic inflammatory syndromes, we measured plasma cytokines (interleukin-1β and TNF-α) in treated patients. All the samples from patients treated on Schedule E were below the detectable limits of the assay. None of these patients had MOF events. Cytokine data were not available for patients who had developed MOF (Schedules A and B), which was a limitation of our study. The most common AE reported was pyrexia (n=35, 49%) and pneumonia was the most common infection (n=15, 21%). Establishing the contribution of pevonedistat to these toxicities is challenging. However, there have been a number of reports describing the effects of impaired protein neddylation on innate immunity. For example, the perforin family of pore-forming proteins (the perforins), key bactericidal effector molecules of the innate immune system, require ubiquitin side chains for function. McCormack et al.[13] demonstrated that direct small interfering RNA knockdown of CRLs reduced bactericidal activity of perforin proteins by blocking their ubiquitination. The same phenotype was achieved with pharmacological inhibition of CRLs using pevonedistat. Mice treated with pevonedistat and subsequently inoculated with salmonella died faster from sepsis and organ failure, compared with untreated controls. Despite these interesting observations, none of the patients with MOF on this study had documented bacterial infections. Others have shown that the antigen-presenting ability of dendritic cells and macrophages is markedly impaired by disrupting the neddylation of target substrates either genetically or chemically.[14] This effect suggests a potential use for pevonedistat in the management of autoimmune disorders and graft versus host disease. Elucidation of the immunomodulatory effects of pevonedistat will help to further define both the promise and limitation of his new agent. In summary, the most serious toxicity was observed at higher doses of pevonedistat. For this reason, doses beyond 100 mg/m2 are not being considered for further investigation and no cases of drug-related MOF have been noted at doses currently in development. Pevonedistat combination studies for patients with myeloid malignancies are ongoing.[9, 15]
  14 in total

1.  Neddylation plays an important role in the regulation of murine and human dendritic cell function.

Authors:  Nathan Mathewson; Tomomi Toubai; Steven Kapeles; Yaping Sun; Katherine Oravecz-Wilson; Hiroya Tamaki; Ying Wang; Guoqing Hou; Yi Sun; Pavan Reddy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Inhibition of NEDD8-activating enzyme induces rereplication and apoptosis in human tumor cells consistent with deregulating CDT1 turnover.

Authors:  Michael A Milhollen; Usha Narayanan; Teresa A Soucy; Petter O Veiby; Peter G Smith; Benjamin Amidon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Treatment-emergent mutations in NAEβ confer resistance to the NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924.

Authors:  Michael A Milhollen; Michael P Thomas; Usha Narayanan; Tary Traore; Jessica Riceberg; Benjamin S Amidon; Neil F Bence; Joseph B Bolen; James Brownell; Lawrence R Dick; Huay-Keng Loke; Alice A McDonald; Jingya Ma; Mark G Manfredi; Todd B Sells; Mike D Sintchak; Xiaofeng Yang; Qing Xu; Erik M Koenig; James M Gavin; Peter G Smith
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Inhibition of NEDD8-activating enzyme: a novel approach for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ronan T Swords; Kevin R Kelly; Peter G Smith; James J Garnsey; Devalingam Mahalingam; Ernest Medina; Kelli Oberheu; Swaminathan Padmanabhan; Michael O'Dwyer; Steffan T Nawrocki; Francis J Giles; Jennifer S Carew
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Pevonedistat (MLN4924), a First-in-Class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 1 study.

Authors:  Ronan T Swords; Harry P Erba; Daniel J DeAngelo; Dale L Bixby; Jessica K Altman; Michael Maris; Zhaowei Hua; Stephen J Blakemore; Hélène Faessel; Farhad Sedarati; Bruce J Dezube; Francis J Giles; Bruno C Medeiros
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Targeting NEDD8-activated cullin-RING ligases for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Teresa A Soucy; Peter G Smith; Mark Rolfe
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer.

Authors:  Teresa A Soucy; Peter G Smith; Michael A Milhollen; Allison J Berger; James M Gavin; Sharmila Adhikari; James E Brownell; Kristine E Burke; David P Cardin; Stephen Critchley; Courtney A Cullis; Amanda Doucette; James J Garnsey; Jeffrey L Gaulin; Rachel E Gershman; Anna R Lublinsky; Alice McDonald; Hirotake Mizutani; Usha Narayanan; Edward J Olhava; Stephane Peluso; Mansoureh Rezaei; Michael D Sintchak; Tina Talreja; Michael P Thomas; Tary Traore; Stepan Vyskocil; Gabriel S Weatherhead; Jie Yu; Julie Zhang; Lawrence R Dick; Christopher F Claiborne; Mark Rolfe; Joseph B Bolen; Steven P Langston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phase I Study of the Novel Investigational NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor Pevonedistat (MLN4924) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma.

Authors:  Jatin J Shah; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Owen A O'Connor; Robert Z Orlowski; R Donald Harvey; Mitchell R Smith; Daniel Lebovic; Catherine Diefenbach; Kevin Kelly; Zhaowei Hua; Allison J Berger; George Mulligan; Hélène M Faessel; Stephen Tirrell; Bruce J Dezube; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  The NAE inhibitor pevonedistat (MLN4924) synergizes with TNF-α to activate apoptosis.

Authors:  F S Wolenski; C D Fisher; T Sano; S D Wyllie; L A Cicia; M J Gallacher; R A Baker; P J Kirby; J J Senn
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2015-10-05

10.  Enteric pathogens deploy cell cycle inhibiting factors to block the bactericidal activity of Perforin-2.

Authors:  Ryan M McCormack; Kirill Lyapichev; Melissa L Olsson; Eckhard R Podack; George P Munson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Leveraging Hypomethylating Agents for Better MDS Therapy.

Authors:  Terrence J Bradley; Justin M Watts; Ronan T Swords
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Following in the footsteps of acute myeloid leukemia: are we witnessing the start of a therapeutic revolution for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-05-18

Review 3.  New and emerging therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Julian R Davis; David J Benjamin; Brian A Jonas
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Perspectives on the Clinical Development of NRF2-Targeting Drugs.

Authors:  Diego Lastra; Raquel Fernández-Ginés; Gina Manda; Antonio Cuadrado
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021

5.  Hepatic neddylation targets and stabilizes electron transfer flavoproteins to facilitate fatty acid β-oxidation.

Authors:  Xueying Zhang; Yao-Lin Zhang; Guihua Qiu; Lili Pian; Lu Guo; Huanling Cao; Jian Liu; Yawei Zhao; Xin Li; Zhe Xu; Xiaofeng Huang; Jingru Huang; Jie Dong; Beifen Shen; Hong-Xia Wang; Xiaomin Ying; Weiping J Zhang; Xuetao Cao; Jiyan Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pevonedistat, a first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, combined with azacitidine in patients with AML.

Authors:  Ronan T Swords; Steven Coutre; Michael B Maris; Joshua F Zeidner; James M Foran; Jose Cruz; Harry P Erba; Jesus G Berdeja; Wayne Tam; Saran Vardhanabhuti; Iwona Pawlikowska-Dobler; Hélène M Faessel; Ajeeta B Dash; Farhad Sedarati; Bruce J Dezube; Douglas V Faller; Michael R Savona
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Cullin-Ring ubiquitin ligases in kidney health and disease.

Authors:  Ryan J Cornelius; Mohammed Z Ferdaus; Jonathan W Nelson; James A McCormick
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Small Molecule NF-κB Pathway Inhibitors in Clinic.

Authors:  Venkataramanan Ramadass; Thamilselvan Vaiyapuri; Vinay Tergaonkar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Felicitas Thol; Michael Heuser
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 10.  Inflammatory Pathophysiology as a Contributor to Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Daniel Arthur Corpuz Fisher; Jared Scott Fowles; Amy Zhou; Stephen Tracy Oh
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.