| Literature DB >> 28156250 |
Takeshi Shimizu1,2,3, Koichi Hosomi1,2,3, Tomoyuki Maruo1,2,4, Yuko Goto1,2, Masaru Yokoe1,5, Yu Kageyama2,6, Toshio Shimokawa7, Toshiki Yoshimine2,3, Youichi Saitoh1,2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrical motor cortex stimulation can relieve neuropathic pain (NP), but its use requires patients to undergo an invasive procedure. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) using a figure-8 coil can relieve NP noninvasively, but its ability to relieve lower limb pain is still limited. Deep rTMS using an H-coil can effectively stimulate deep brain regions and has been widely used for the treatment of various neurological diseases; however, there have been no clinical studies comparing the effectiveness of figure-8 coils and H-coils. This study assessed the clinical effectiveness of 5 once-daily stimulations with H-coils and figure-8 coils in patients with NP. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover trial examined 18 patients with NP who sequentially received 3 types of stimulations in the M1 for 5 consecutive days; each 5-day stimulation period was followed by a 17-day follow-up period before crossing over to the next type of stimulation. During each rTMS session, patients received a 5-Hz rTMS to the M1 region corresponding to the painful lower limb. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ2-J) were used to measure pain intensity. The primary outcome was VAS score reduction immediately after and 1 hour after intervention. RESULTS Both the VAS and SF-MPQ2-J showed significant pain improvement immediately after deep rTMS with an H-coil as compared with the sham group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). However, neither outcome measure showed significant pain improvement when using a figure-8 coil. The VAS also showed significant pain improvement 1 hour after deep rTMS with an H-coil (p = 0.004) but not 1 hour after rTMS using a figure-8 coil. None of the patients exhibited any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest that the use of deep rTMS with an H-coil in the lower limb region of the M1 in patients with NP was tolerable and could provide significant short-term pain relief. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000010536 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ).Entities:
Keywords: ANOVA = analysis of variance; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CPSP = central poststroke pain; EMCS = electrical motor cortex stimulation; FBSS = failed–back surgery syndrome; H-coil; H-coil = Hesed coil; M1 = primary motor cortex; NP = neuropathic pain; PGIC = patient global impression of change; RMT = resting motor threshold; SCD = subacute combined degeneration; SCI = spinal cord injury; SF-MPQ2-J = short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2, Japanese version; TCS = tethered spinal cord syndrome; TMS = transcranial magnetic stimulation; VAS = visual analog scale; deep rTMS; figure-8 coil; lower limb pain; neuropathic pain; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28156250 DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosurg ISSN: 0022-3085 Impact factor: 5.115