Literature DB >> 28156250

Efficacy of deep rTMS for neuropathic pain in the lower limb: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial of an H-coil and figure-8 coil.

Takeshi Shimizu1,2,3, Koichi Hosomi1,2,3, Tomoyuki Maruo1,2,4, Yuko Goto1,2, Masaru Yokoe1,5, Yu Kageyama2,6, Toshio Shimokawa7, Toshiki Yoshimine2,3, Youichi Saitoh1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Electrical motor cortex stimulation can relieve neuropathic pain (NP), but its use requires patients to undergo an invasive procedure. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) using a figure-8 coil can relieve NP noninvasively, but its ability to relieve lower limb pain is still limited. Deep rTMS using an H-coil can effectively stimulate deep brain regions and has been widely used for the treatment of various neurological diseases; however, there have been no clinical studies comparing the effectiveness of figure-8 coils and H-coils. This study assessed the clinical effectiveness of 5 once-daily stimulations with H-coils and figure-8 coils in patients with NP. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, 3-way crossover trial examined 18 patients with NP who sequentially received 3 types of stimulations in the M1 for 5 consecutive days; each 5-day stimulation period was followed by a 17-day follow-up period before crossing over to the next type of stimulation. During each rTMS session, patients received a 5-Hz rTMS to the M1 region corresponding to the painful lower limb. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ2-J) were used to measure pain intensity. The primary outcome was VAS score reduction immediately after and 1 hour after intervention. RESULTS Both the VAS and SF-MPQ2-J showed significant pain improvement immediately after deep rTMS with an H-coil as compared with the sham group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). However, neither outcome measure showed significant pain improvement when using a figure-8 coil. The VAS also showed significant pain improvement 1 hour after deep rTMS with an H-coil (p = 0.004) but not 1 hour after rTMS using a figure-8 coil. None of the patients exhibited any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest that the use of deep rTMS with an H-coil in the lower limb region of the M1 in patients with NP was tolerable and could provide significant short-term pain relief. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000010536 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANOVA = analysis of variance; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CPSP = central poststroke pain; EMCS = electrical motor cortex stimulation; FBSS = failed–back surgery syndrome; H-coil; H-coil = Hesed coil; M1 = primary motor cortex; NP = neuropathic pain; PGIC = patient global impression of change; RMT = resting motor threshold; SCD = subacute combined degeneration; SCI = spinal cord injury; SF-MPQ2-J = short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2, Japanese version; TCS = tethered spinal cord syndrome; TMS = transcranial magnetic stimulation; VAS = visual analog scale; deep rTMS; figure-8 coil; lower limb pain; neuropathic pain; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28156250     DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  16 in total

Review 1.  Neurostimulation methods in the treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  X Moisset; M Lanteri-Minet; D Fontaine
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F Proessl; M C Canino; M E Beckner; A M Sinnott; S R Eagle; A D LaGoy; W R Conkright; A J Sterczala; C Connaboy; F Ferrarelli; A Germain; B C Nindl; S D Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Neuropathic Corneal Pain: Approaches for Management.

Authors:  Gabriela Dieckmann; Sunali Goyal; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  New Developments in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy J Meeker; Rithvic Jupudi; Frederik A Lenz; Joel D Greenspan
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 5.  Analgesic Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kun-Long Zhang; Hua Yuan; Fei-Fei Wu; Xue-Yin Pu; Bo-Zhi Liu; Ze Li; Kai-Feng Li; Hui Liu; Yi Yang; Ya-Yun Wang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Prevalence and Management Challenges in Central Post-Stroke Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Liampas; Nikolaos Velidakis; Tiffany Georgiou; Athina Vadalouca; Giustino Varrassi; Georgios M Hadjigeorgiou; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Panagiotis Zis
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Diffusion Tensor Tractography Studies of Central Post-stroke Pain Due to the Spinothalamic Tract Injury: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Jeong Pyo Seo; Sung Jun Lee
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  A randomized controlled trial of 5 daily sessions and continuous trial of 4 weekly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Koichi Hosomi; Kenji Sugiyama; Yusaku Nakamura; Toshio Shimokawa; Satoru Oshino; Yuko Goto; Tomoo Mano; Takeshi Shimizu; Takufumi Yanagisawa; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 9.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 10.  Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP).

Authors:  Abrahão Fontes Baptista; Ana Mércia B L Fernandes; Katia Nunes Sá; Alexandre Hideki Okano; André Russowsky Brunoni; Argelia Lara-Solares; Aziza Jreige Iskandar; Carlos Guerrero; César Amescua-García; Durval Campos Kraychete; Egas Caparelli-Daquer; Elias Atencio; Fabián Piedimonte; Frantz Colimon; Fuad Ahmed Hazime; João Batista S Garcia; John Jairo Hernández-Castro; José Alberto Flores Cantisani; Kátia Karina do Monte-Silva; Luis Claudio Lemos Correia; Manuel Sempértegui Gallegos; Marco Antonio Marcolin; María Antonieta Ricco; María Berenguel Cook; Patricia Bonilla; Pedro Schestatsky; Ricardo Galhardoni; Valquíria Silva; William Delgado Barrera; Wolnei Caumo; Didier Bouhassira; Lucy S Chipchase; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.