Peter May1, Melissa M Garrido2,3, J Brian Cassel4, Amy S Kelley3, Diane E Meier3, Charles Normand1, Thomas J Smith5, R Sean Morrison2,3. 1. 1 Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 2. 2 Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. 3. 3 Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 4. 4 Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Massey Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 5. 5 Palliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies report cost-savings from hospital-based palliative care consultation teams compared to usual care only, but drivers of observed differences are unclear. AIM: To analyse cost-differences associated with palliative care consultation teams using two research questions: (Q1) What is the association between early palliative care consultation team intervention, and intensity of services and length of stay, compared to usual care only? (Q2) What is the association between early palliative care consultation team intervention and day-to-day hospital costs, compared to a later intervention? DESIGN: Prospective multi-site cohort study (2007-2011). Patients who received a consultation were placed in the intervention group, those who did not in the comparison group. Intervention group was stratified by timing, and groups were matched using propensity scores. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted to three US hospitals with advanced cancer. Principle analytic sample contains 863 patients ( nUC = 637; nPC EARLY = 177; nPC LATE = 49) discharged alive. RESULTS: Cost-savings from early palliative care accrue due to both reduced length of stay and reduced intensity of treatment, with an estimated 63% of savings associated with shorter length of stay. A reduction in day-to-day costs is observable in the days immediately following initial consult but does not persist indefinitely. A comparison of early and late palliative care consultation team cost-effects shows negligible difference once the intervention is administered. CONCLUSION: Reduced length of stay is the biggest driver of cost-saving from early consultation for patients with advanced cancer. Patient- and family-centred discussions on goals of care and transition planning initiated by palliative care consultation teams may be at least as important in driving cost-savings as the reduction of unnecessary tests and pharmaceuticals identified by previous studies.
BACKGROUND: Studies report cost-savings from hospital-based palliative care consultation teams compared to usual care only, but drivers of observed differences are unclear. AIM: To analyse cost-differences associated with palliative care consultation teams using two research questions: (Q1) What is the association between early palliative care consultation team intervention, and intensity of services and length of stay, compared to usual care only? (Q2) What is the association between early palliative care consultation team intervention and day-to-day hospital costs, compared to a later intervention? DESIGN: Prospective multi-site cohort study (2007-2011). Patients who received a consultation were placed in the intervention group, those who did not in the comparison group. Intervention group was stratified by timing, and groups were matched using propensity scores. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted to three US hospitals with advanced cancer. Principle analytic sample contains 863 patients ( nUC = 637; nPC EARLY = 177; nPC LATE = 49) discharged alive. RESULTS: Cost-savings from early palliative care accrue due to both reduced length of stay and reduced intensity of treatment, with an estimated 63% of savings associated with shorter length of stay. A reduction in day-to-day costs is observable in the days immediately following initial consult but does not persist indefinitely. A comparison of early and late palliative care consultation team cost-effects shows negligible difference once the intervention is administered. CONCLUSION: Reduced length of stay is the biggest driver of cost-saving from early consultation for patients with advanced cancer. Patient- and family-centred discussions on goals of care and transition planning initiated by palliative care consultation teams may be at least as important in driving cost-savings as the reduction of unnecessary tests and pharmaceuticals identified by previous studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Palliative care; cancer; economics; hospital costs; length of stay
Authors: Sandhya Yadav; Isaac W Heller; Nancy Schaefer; Ramzi G Salloum; Sheri M Kittelson; Diana J Wilkie; Jinhai Huo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter May; Charles Normand; J Brian Cassel; Egidio Del Fabbro; Robert L Fine; Reagan Menz; Corey A Morrison; Joan D Penrod; Chessie Robinson; R Sean Morrison Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Hsien Seow; Lisa C Barbera; Kimberlyn McGrail; Fred Burge; Dawn M Guthrie; Beverley Lawson; Kelvin K W Chan; Stuart J Peacock; Rinku Sutradhar Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-08-13
Authors: Natalie C Ernecoff; Andrew Bilderback; Johanna Bellon; Robert M Arnold; Michael Boninger; Dio Kavalieratos Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jinwook Hwang; Jay J Shen; Sun Jung Kim; Sung-Youn Chun; Pearl C Kim; Se Won Lee; David Byun; Ji Won Yoo Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 1.817