| Literature DB >> 28155699 |
Ruoyu Xing1, David De Wilde2, Gayle McCann1, Yanto Ridwan3, Jelle T C Schrauwen1, Anton F W van der Steen1, Frank J H Gijsen4, Kim Van der Heiden1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wall shear stress (WSS) is involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. The correlation between WSS and atherosclerosis can be investigated over time using a WSS-manipulated atherosclerotic mouse model. To determine WSS in vivo, detailed 3D geometry of the vessel network is required. However, a protocol to reconstruct 3D murine vasculature using this animal model is lacking. In this project, we evaluated the adequacy of eXIA 160, a small animal contrast agent, for assessing murine vascular network on micro-CT. Also, a protocol was established for vessel geometry segmentation and WSS analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Contrast media; Image segmentation; Micro-CT imaging; Wall shear stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28155699 PMCID: PMC5259814 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0270-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Illustration of image segmentation. Red straight line indicates the original contour placed in MeVisLab; Lumen area is represented by the red shaded area by shrinking 20% of the original contour area; Background area is defined as the area between the 20 and 40% expanded original contour, shown as the green shaded area
Fig. 23D volume rendering of the bone structures and vascular network in the neck region for eXIA 160. Major vasculature including internal jugular vein (①) and the carotid arteries (②) were visualized (scale bar 1 mm). The box shows the zoomed-in area of the narrowing RCCA caused by the tapering cast (scale bar 400 µm)
Fig. 3a Illustration of the RCCA with cast on micro-CT using eXIA 160. b Contrast intensity along the RCCA using eXIA 160. Lumen region is shown in red line with square markers; Blue line with cross markers represents the local threshold; Black dashed line indicates global threshold value; Background region is marked as green line with circles; Standard deviation is indicated by shadow areas
Contrast-related parameters (in Hounsfield Units) of eXIA 160 along RCCA
| Mouse number | Non-cast region | Cast region | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumen | Background | Contrast difference | Lumen | Background | Contrast difference | |
| 1 | 428 ± 58 | 95 ± 36 | 323 ± 61 | 325 ± 90 | −47 ± 51 | 372 ± 124 |
| 2 | 372 ± 35 | 76 ± 42 | 296 ± 47 | 299 ± 47 | −93 ± 47 | 392 ± 87 |
| 3 | 286 ± 41 | 32 ± 54 | 254 ± 45 | 199 ± 54 | −169 ± 33 | 368 ± 65 |
| 4 | 328 ± 49 | 67 ± 40 | 261 ± 41 | 247 ± 62 | −93 ± 33 | 340 ± 71 |
| 5 | 330 ± 38 | 41 ± 31 | 289 ± 34 | 241 ± 53 | −135 ± 45 | 376 ± 85 |
| 6 | 281 ± 33 | 41 ± 29 | 240 ± 39 | 191 ± 71 | −96 ± 56 | 287 ± 111 |
| 7 | 306 ± 33 | 42 ± 35 | 264 ± 45 | 255 ± 67 | −46 ± 39 | 301 ± 98 |
| 8 | 383 ± 65 | 31 ± 36 | 352 ± 67 | 299 ± 90 | −100 ± 49 | 399 ± 128 |
| Average | 339 ± 51 | 53 ± 23 | 285 ± 38 | 257 ± 48 | −97 ± 41 | 354 ± 41 |
Fig. 43D reconstruction of RCCA by eXIA 160 enhanced micro-CT using a the local threshold and b the global threshold segmentation. The narrowing of the lumen caused by the cast was clearly captured
Fig. 5a Comparison of RCCA vessel dimensions obtained from two segmentation methods with known cast geometry. Vessel surface reconstructed from the local threshold segmentation (straight line) showed good agreement between the vessel geometry and the cast dimension. Vessel surface reconstructed from the global threshold segmentation (dashed line) significantly underestimated the cast dimensions. b RCCA vessel wall thickness within the cast region obtained from the local threshold segmentation (straight line) corresponded to that of the normal vessel wall thickness. Vessel surface reconstructed from the global threshold segmentation (dashed line) significantly overestimated the vessel wall thickness
Fig. 6Time-dependent velocity profile at proximal RCCA. Black dash lines indicate wave forms measured by Doppler Ultrasound; Red line represents the averaged velocity calculated over 4 cardiac cycles while blue lines indicates the filtered wave form used as inlet boundary condition
Average flow rate and wall shear stress at inlet of RCCA
| Mouse number | Mean flow rate (mm3/s) | Wall shear stress (Pa) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.8 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.6 |
| 2 | 15.5 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.5 |
| 3 | N/A | N/A |
| 4 | 13.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| 5 | 9.4 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| 6 | 20.2 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 |
| 7 | 39.0 ± 0.4 | 6.4 ± 0.1 |
| 8 | 14.8 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.1 |
| Average | 19.8 ± 9.9 | 3.3 ± 1.8 |
Fig. 7a Hemodynamic analysis of shear-manipulated RCCA using vessel geometry created from the local threshold method. Streamline (left panel) representing velocity field along the RCCA; TAWSS (middle panel) and OSI distribution (right panel) along the RCCA. b Hemodynamic analysis of shear-manipulated RCCA using vessel geometry created from the global threshold method. Streamline (left panel) representing velocity field along the RCCA; TAWSS (middle panel) and OSI distribution (right panel) along the RCCA. The range of the colormap is between 0 and 20 Pa