| Literature DB >> 28155694 |
Dongyuan Lü1,2,3, Zhan Li1,2,3, Yuxin Gao1,2,3, Chunhua Luo1,2,3, Fan Zhang1,2,3, Lu Zheng1,2,3, Jiawen Wang1,2,3, Shujin Sun1,2,3, Mian Long4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Keratinocyte (KC) migration in re-epithelization is crucial in repairing injured skin. But the mechanisms of how mechanical stimuli regulate the migration of keratinocytes have been poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: Fibroblast; Keratinocyte; Mechanical stretch; Mechanotransduction; β1 integrin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28155694 PMCID: PMC5259898 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0263-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Mechanical stimuli used to examine signaling proteins in HaCaT cells migration. a Image of an in-house developed static stretch device by applying mechanical stimuli via a stretchable silicone membrane to the cells. b Schematic of cell migration under tensile stress on silicone membrane at a typical 20% strain. HaCaT and HF cells were seeded in two separated regions, and the migration distance L (away from HF cells) or L’ (towards HF cells) and the migration leading edge of HaCaT cells were illustrated
Fig. 2Alteration of β1 integrin expression on WT- and β1 integrin knockdown- HaCaT cell migration under coculture and mechanical stretch. a RT-PCR analysis of β1 integrin in WT- and silenced- (Sil-) HaCaT cells. Red lines indicated the molecular weight of the target fragments. b WB analysis of β1 integrin in WT- and Sil-HaCaT cells. c Comparison of β1 integrin expression between WT- (open bar) and Sil- (solid bar) HaCaT cells. WT-cells transfected via plain plasmid (grey bar) was used as control. d, e Time courses of β1 integrin expression in WT- (d) or Sil- (e) HaCaT cells under cocultured with fibroblasts and mechanical stretch. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) of normalized fluorescence intensity (FI) fold of totally >9 cells at the leading edge
Fig. 3Expression of vinculin in WT- and Sil-HaCaT cells in four migration patterns at different time points. a, b IF images and time courses of vinculin expression in WT-HaCaT cells (a). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge. ††The level of statistical significance of difference in normalized mean FI at t = 1 h between C/S IN and C/S OUT patterns in WT-HaCaT cells (b). c, d IF images and time courses of vinculin expression in Sil-HaCaT cells (c). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge (d). Scale bar 50 μm
Fig. 4Expression of Cdc42 in WT- and Sil-HaCaT cells in four migration patterns at different time points. a, b IF images and time courses of Cdc42 expression in WT-HaCaT cells (a). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge. ††The level of statistical significance of difference in normalized mean FI at t = 1 h between C/S IN and C/S OUT patterns in WT-HaCaT cells (b). c, d IF images and time courses of Cdc42 expression in Sil-HaCaT cells (c). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge (d). e Optical images of pseudopodium formation in WT-HaCaT cells. Arrows indicate the pseudopodium at day 2. Scale bar 50 μm
Fig. 5Expression of PI3K in WT- and Sil-HaCaT cells migration in four migration patterns at different time points. (a, b) IF images and time courses of PI3K expression in WT-HaCaT cells (a). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge. †The level of statistical significance of difference in normalized mean FI at t = 1 h between C/S IN and C/S OUT patterns in WT-HaCaT cells (b). (c, d) IF images and time courses of PI3K expression in Sil-HaCaT cells (c). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge (d). Scale bar 50 μm
Fig. 6Expression of phosphorylated ERK1/2 in WT- and Sil-HaCaT cells in four migration patterns at different time points. a, b IF images and time courses of phosphorylated ERK1/2 expression in WT-HaCaT cells (a). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge. ††The level of statistical significance of difference in normalized mean FI at t = 24 between C/S IN and C/S OUT patterns in WT-HaCaT cells (b). (c, d) IF images and time courses of phosphorylated ERK1/2 expression in Sil-HaCaT cells (c). Data were presented as the mean ± SE of normalized FI of totally >9 cells at the leading edge (d). Scale bar 50 μm