| Literature DB >> 28155316 |
Samuel N Cumber, Joyce M Tsoka-Gwegweni1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The issue of street children is one of the global social problems rising in low- and middle-income countries. These children are vulnerable, but because of a lack of sufficient information, it is very difficult for stakeholders to address their plight in Cameroon. AIM: To examine the situation and characteristics of street children in three Cameroonian cities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28155316 PMCID: PMC5125264 DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ISSN: 2071-2928
The distribution of demographic characteristics of participants per city (Bamenda, Douala, Yaoundé).
| Characteristics | Total | Bamenda ( | Douala ( | Yaoundé (n = 137) | Chi2, df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 320(80.2) | 108 | 86.4 | 101 | 73.7 | 111 | 81.0 | 6.704, 2 |
| Female | 79(19.8) | 17 | 13.6 | 36 | 26.3 | 26 | 18.9 | 0.035 |
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| 12–14 | 89(22.3) | 29 | 23.2 | 31 | 22.6 | 29 | 21.1 | 0.1682, 2 |
| 15–17 | 310(77.7) | 96 | 76.8 | 106 | 77.4 | 108 | 78.8 | 0.919 |
| Religion | ||||||||
| Christianity | 331(82.9) | 99 | 79.2 | 121 | 88.3 | 111 | 81.0 | 12.21, 4 |
| Islam | 36(9.0) | 9 | 7.2 | 13 | 9.5 | 14 | 10.2 | 0.016 |
| Traditional/none | 32(8.0) | 17 | 13.6 | 3 | 2.2 | 12 | 8.8 | - |
| Educational level | ||||||||
| No formal education | 85(21.3) | 40 | 32.0 | 18 | 13.1 | 27 | 19.7 | 18.71, 4 |
| Primary | 309(77.4) | 84 | 67.2 | 115 | 83.9 | 110 | 80.3 | 0.001 |
| Secondary | 5(1.3) | 1 | 0.8 | 4 | 2.9 | 0 | 0.0 | - |
| Reason for school dropout | ||||||||
| No money | 212(53.1) | 40 | 32.0 | 113 | 82.5 | 59 | 43.1 | 82.06, 4 |
| Did not like school | 128(32.1) | 56 | 44.8 | 11 | 8.0 | 61 | 44.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Bullied in school/teachers not nice | 59(14.8) | 29 | 23.2 | 13 | 9.5 | 17 | 12.4 | - |
Source: Cumber & Tsoka-Gwegweni 2015
p-value is less than 0.05, meaning that the comparison/difference is statistically significant.
The distribution of socio-economic indicators of the participants in each city (Bamenda, Douala, Yaoundé)
| Characteristics | Total | Bamenda ( | Douala ( | Yaoundé ( | Chi2, df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | ||||||
| Time on the street | ||||||||
| < 6 months | 143(35.8) | 49 | 39.2 | 57 | 41.6 | 37 | 27.0 | 11.93, 4 |
| 7–12 months | 179(44.9) | 59 | 47.2 | 57 | 41.6 | 63 | 45.9 | 0.018 |
| > 13 months | 77(19.3) | 17 | 13.6 | 23 | 16.8 | 37 | 27.0 | - |
| Where they often sleep? | ||||||||
| On the street | 233(58.4) | 79 | 63.2 | 73 | 53.3 | 81 | 59.1 | 6.550, 4 |
| Market places | 78(19.6) | 26 | 20.8 | 32 | 23.4 | 20 | 14.6 | 0.162 |
| Old buildings/shelter homes | 88(22.1) | 20 | 16.0 | 32 | 23.4 | 36 | 26.3 | - |
| Main economic activity | ||||||||
| Begging/support from friends | 235(58.9) | 73 | 58.4 | 83 | 60.6 | 79 | 57.7 | 8.631, 8 |
| Guarding/washing cars | 41(10.3) | 13 | 10.4 | 15 | 10.9 | 13 | 9.5 | 0.374 |
| Shoe shinning | 23(5.8) | 7 | 5.6 | 7 | 5.1 | 9 | 6.6 | - |
| Work in small restaurants/bar/clubs | 74(18.6) | 18 | 14.4 | 27 | 19.7 | 29 | 21.2 | - |
| Stealing(pick-pocketing) | 26(6.5) | 14 | 11.2 | 5 | 3.7 | 7 | 5.1 | - |
| Daily average income (in CFA francs) | ||||||||
| 0–195 | 149(37.3) | 44 | 35.2 | 24 | 17.5 | 81 | 59.1 | 57.07, 4 |
| 200–495 | 178(44.1) | 65 | 52.0 | 80 | 58.4 | 33 | 24.1 | < 0.0001 |
| > 500 | 72(18.1) | 16 | 16.0 | 33 | 24.1 | 23 | 16.8 | - |
| How they obtain food | ||||||||
| Buying | 279(69.9) | 84 | 67.2 | 108 | 78.8 | 87 | 63.5 | 4.698, 2 |
| Eating left overs | 99(24.8) | 41 | 32.8 | 29 | 21.2 | 29 | 21.2 | 0.0955 |
| From drop-in centres | 21(5.3) | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 21 | 15.3 | - |
| Number or meals per day | ||||||||
| 1 | 144(36.1) | 60 | 48.0 | 37 | 27.0 | 47 | 34.3 | 14.68, 4 |
| 2 | 174(43.6) | 49 | 39.2 | 65 | 47.6 | 60 | 43.8 | 0.005 |
| > 3 | 81(20.3) | 16 | 12.8 | 35 | 25.6 | 30 | 21.9 | - |
| Number of siblings | ||||||||
| 1–4 | 78(19.6) | 43 | 34.4 | 22 | 16.1 | 13 | 9.5 | 28.39, 4 |
| 5–8 | 226(56.6) | 53 | 42.4 | 87 | 63.5 | 86 | 62.8 | < 0.0001 |
| > 9 | 87(21.8) | 29 | 23.2 | 28 | 20.4 | 30 | 21.9 | - |
| Do not know | 8(2.0) | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 5.8 | - |
| Frequency of family contact | ||||||||
| No contact | 352(88.2) | 103 | 82.4 | 123 | 89.8 | 126 | 91.9 | 2.573, 2 |
| Monthly | 42(10.5) | 17 | 13.6 | 14 | 10.2 | 11 | 8.0 | 0.2762 |
| Other | 5(1.3) | 5 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - |
Source: Cumber & Tsoka-Gwegweni 2015
p-value is less than 0.05, meaning that the comparison/difference is statistically significant.
FIGURE 1Reasons for being on the street by respondents in each city.
Distribution of some behaviours of respondents in each city (Bamenda, Douala, Yaoundé).
| Characteristics | Total | Bamenda ( | Douala ( | Yaoundé ( | Chi2, df | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |||||||
| Police arrest in the last 3 months | |||||||||
| Yes | 225(56.4) | 59 | 47.2 | 112 | 81.8 | 54 | 39.4 | 56.18, 2 | |
| No | 174(43.6) | 66 | 52.8 | 25 | 18.3 | 83 | 60.6 | <0.0001 | |
| Reason for being arrested by police | |||||||||
| Never been arrested | 178(44.6) | 69 | 55.2 | 25 | 18.3 | 84 | 61.3 | 97.87, 6 | |
| Stealing | 55(13.8) | 26 | 20.8 | 18 | 13.1 | 11 | 8.0 | <0.0001 | |
| Street fighting | 73(18.3) | 11 | 8.8 | 52 | 37.9 | 10 | 7.3 | - | |
| Was drunk | 59(14.8) | 13 | 10.4 | 34 | 24.8 | 12 | 8.7 | - | |
| Illegal herb smoking | 34(8.5) | 6 | 4.8 | 8 | 5.8 | 20 | 14.6 | - | |
| Children hurt themselves | |||||||||
| Yes | 89(22.3) | 31 | 24.8 | 20 | 14.6 | 38 | 27.7 | 7.477, 2 | |
| No | 310(77.7) | 94 | 75.2 | 117 | 85.4 | 99 | 72.3 | 0.024 | |
| Reason for hurting themselves | |||||||||
| Anger | 57(64.0) | 29 | 93.6 | 10 | 47.6 | 18 | 48.7 | 18.83, 4 | |
| Drugs | 18(20.2) | 0 | 0.0 | 7 | 33.3 | 11 | 29.7 | 0.001 | |
| Peer pressure | 14(15.7) | 2 | 6.5 | 4 | 19.1 | 8 | 21.6 | - | |
Source: Cumber & Tsoka-Gwegweni 2015
p-value is less than 0.05, meaning that the comparison/difference is statistically significant.
Challenges faced by participants in each city (Bamenda, Douala, Yaoundé).
| Characteristics | Total | Bamenda ( | Douala ( | Yaoundé ( | Chi2, df | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | ||||||
| Attitude of public towards street children | ||||||||
| Supportive | 2(0.5) | 1 | 0.80 | 1 | 0.73 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.023 |
| Hatred | 238(59.7) | 68 | 54.4 | 73 | 53.3 | 97 | 70.8 | - |
| Indifferent | 159(39.9) | 56 | 44.80 | 63 | 46.0 | 40 | 29.2 | - |
| Lack attachment and inability to cope | 292(73.2) | 84 | 67.2 | 98 | 71.5 | 110 | 80.3 | 0.050 |
| Access to street services | 26(6.5) | 8 | 6.4 | 6 | 4.4 | 12 | 8.8 | 0.339 |
| Sick in the last month | 335(83.9) | 113 | 90.4 | 107 | 78.1 | 115 | 83.9 | 0.025 |
| Cause of illness | ||||||||
| Mosquito bite | 124(31.1) | 43 | 34.4 | 40 | 29.2 | 41 | 29.9 | 11.34, 10 |
| Drinking dirty water | 75(18.8) | 26 | 20.8 | 21 | 15.3 | 28 | 20.4 | 0.332 |
| Exposure to cold | 91(22.8) | 27 | 21.6 | 32 | 23.4 | 32 | 23.4 | - |
| Fatigue from work | 43(10.8) | 14 | 11.2 | 15 | 10.9 | 14 | 10.2 | - |
| Drug use | 6(1.5) | 3 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 2.2 | - |
| Unknown/others | 60(15.0) | 12 | 9.6 | 29 | 21.2 | 19 | 13.9 | - |
| Treatment method sought | ||||||||
| No treatment | 194(48.6) | 80 | 64.0 | 63 | 45.9 | 51 | 37.2 | 22.31, 4 |
| Self-medication | 151(37.8) | 33 | 26.4 | 62 | 45.3 | 56 | 40.9 | 0.001 |
| Traditional doctor | 47(11.8) | 11 | 8.8 | 12 | 8.8 | 24 | 17.5 | - |
| Modern medicine | 7(1.8) | 1 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 4.4 | - |
| Type of sexually transmitted disease | ||||||||
| Gonorrhoea | 214(53.6) | 49 | 39.2 | 68 | 49.6 | 97 | 70.8 | 39.67, 4 |
| Syphilis | 29(7.3) | 6 | 4.8 | 9 | 6.6 | 14 | 10.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Unknown | 156(39.1) | 70 | 56.0 | 60 | 43.8 | 26 | 18.9 | - |
| Sexual abuse on the street | ||||||||
| Yes | 257(64.4) | 88 | 70.4 | 68 | 49.6 | 101 | 73.7 | 20.19, 2 |
| No | 142(35.6) | 37 | 29.6 | 69 | 50.4 | 36 | 26.3 | < 0.0001 |
Source: Cumber & Tsoka-Gwegweni 2015
p-value is less than 0.05, meaning that the comparison/difference is statistically significant.
FIGURE 2Sources of support for the participants in each city.