Literature DB >> 28154078

Improving election prediction internationally.

Ryan Kennedy1, Stefan Wojcik2,3, David Lazer2,3.   

Abstract

This study reports the results of a multiyear program to predict direct executive elections in a variety of countries from globally pooled data. We developed prediction models by means of an election data set covering 86 countries and more than 500 elections, and a separate data set with extensive polling data from 146 election rounds. We also participated in two live forecasting experiments. Our models correctly predicted 80 to 90% of elections in out-of-sample tests. The results suggest that global elections can be successfully modeled and that they are likely to become more predictable as more information becomes available in future elections. The results provide strong evidence for the impact of political institutions and incumbent advantage. They also provide evidence to support contentions about the importance of international linkage and aid. Direct evidence for economic indicators as predictors of election outcomes is relatively weak. The results suggest that, with some adjustments, global polling is a robust predictor of election outcomes, even in developing states. Implications of these findings after the latest U.S. presidential election are discussed.
Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28154078     DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  4 in total

1.  Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.

Authors:  Ming Gao; Zhongyuan Wang; Kai Wang; Chenhui Liu; Shiping Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Application of Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Estimating Daily Concentrations of PM2.5 Components.

Authors:  Tianyu Zhang; Guannan Geng; Yang Liu; Howard H Chang
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Fundamental limitations on efficiently forecasting certain epidemic measures in network models.

Authors:  Daniel J Rosenkrantz; Anil Vullikanti; S S Ravi; Richard E Stearns; Simon Levin; H Vincent Poor; Madhav V Marathe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pragmatic bias impedes women's access to political leadership.

Authors:  Christianne Corbett; Jan G Voelkel; Marianne Cooper; Robb Willer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.