| Literature DB >> 28153916 |
Ling-Xu Wang1, Na Wang1, Qing-Li Xu2, Wei Yan1, Li Dong1, Bao-Lin Li3.
Abstract
The study aims to investigate the effect of vitamin D (VD) combined with pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism in patients with Type 2 diabetic nephropathy (T2DN). T2DN patients were selected and assigned into mild, moderate, and severe groups. In each group, three therapy regimens (VD, PIO, and VD plus PIO) were administered. X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD. Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-VD3) were measured by chemiluminescence meter. ELISA was applied to detect levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG), bone gla protein (BGP), C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (β-CTX), procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP), pyridinoline (Pyr), and deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr). Compared with the mild group, T2DN patients in the moderate and severe groups had longer course of disease and higher levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), serum phosphorus, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) and creatine (Cr), and lower blood calcium. The BMD in different parts increased among the mild, moderate, and severe groups, and the highest BMD was found after VD plus PIO treatment. OPG, iPTH, BGP, β-CTX, Pyr/Cr, and D-Pyr/Cr levels were reduced, while 25-OH-VD3 and PINP levels were elevated among three groups after different treatments, and the most obvious change was observed after VD plus PIO treatment. Our findings indicate that VD combined with PIO may be more effective in improving BMD and bone metabolism than VD or PIO alone in the treatment of T2DN patients, especially for T2DN patients with mild disease.Entities:
Keywords: Bone metabolism; Bone mineral density; Pioglitazone hydrochloride; Type 2 diabetic nephropathy; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28153916 PMCID: PMC5469326 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20160544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Baseline characteristics of patients with T2DN
| Characteristic | Mild group ( | Moderate group ( | Severe group ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.14 ± 8.10 | 53.82 ± 7.47 | 54.52 ± 8.56 |
| Gender (male/female) | 50/37 | 39/41 | 48/36 |
| Disease course (years) | 6.57 ± 2.25 | 7.90 ± 2.90* | 11.17 ± 4.24*† |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.50 ± 3.28 | 23.38 ± 2.87 | 23.64 ± 3.03 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.62 ± 0.83 | 4.95 ± 0.43* | 5.45 ± 0.64*† |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.63 ± 0.45 | 1.72 ± 0.40* | 1.73 ± 0.47* |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.48 ± 0.40 | 1.63 ± 0.37* | 1.66 ± 0.35* |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.57 ± 0.66 | 2.54 ± 0.59 | 2.64 ± 0.62 |
| Blood calcium (mmol/l) | 2.07 ± 0.30 | 1.76 ± 0.11* | 1.59 ± 0.62*† |
| Phosphorus (mmol/l) | 0.95 ± 0.29 | 1.19 ± 0.19* | 1.51 ± 0.33*† |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 9.23 ± 0.86 | 9.82 ± 1.08* | 10.73 ± 1.01*† |
| HbAlc (%) | 7.35 ± 1.43 | 8.50 ± 1.65* | 9.61 ± 2.00*† |
| Cr (μmol/l) | 105.47 ± 22.75 | 163.19 ± 29.26* | 220.92 ± 31.95*† |
Note: *P<0.05 compared with the mild group; †P<0.05 compared with the moderate group; Cr, serum creatine.
Comparisons of BMD of patients with T2DN among three groups
| Group | BMD at different parts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2∼4 | Neck | Ward’s triangle | Focile | Greater trochanter | Hip joint | |
| Mild group | ||||||
| VD | 0.67 ± 0.11 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.65 ± 0.11 |
| PIO | 0.96 ± 0.07* | 0.84 ± 0.12* | 0.72 ± 0.14* | 0.68 ± 0.17* | 0.76 ± 0.18* | 0.83 ± 0.15* |
| VD + PIO | 1.25 ± 0.14*†‡§ | 0.98 ± 0.20*†‡§ | 0.94 ± 0.36*†‡§ | 0.83 ± 0.16*†‡§ | 0.96 ± 0.16*†‡§ | 0.98 ± 0.15*†‡§ |
| Moderate group | ||||||
| VD | 0.49 ± 0.10 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.47 ± 0.12 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.21 |
| PIO | 0.76 ± 0.09* | 0.65 ± 0.17* | 0.68 ± 0.08* | 0.54 ± 0.08* | 0.66 ± 0.15* | 0.64 ± 0.18* |
| VD + PIO | 0.98 ± 0.13*†‡ | 0.85 ± 0.17*†‡ | 0.84 ± 0.23*†‡ | 0.67 ± 0.28*†‡ | 0.85 ± 0.09*†‡ | 0.82 ± 0.20*†‡ |
| Severe group | ||||||
| VD | 0.26 ± 0.05 | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.08 |
| PIO | 0.59 ± 0.08* | 0.62 ± 0.10* | 0.63 ± 0.08* | 0.33 ± 0.12* | 0.46 ± 0.12* | 0.50 ± 0.08* |
| VD + PIO | 0.87 ± 0.16*† | 0.72 ± 0.17*† | 0.78 ± 0.14*† | 0.46 ± 0.17*† | 0.74 ± 0.17*† | 0.65 ± 0.25*† |
Note: *P<0.05 compared with the VD group; †P<0.05 compared with the PIO group; ‡P<0.05 compared with the severe group; §P<0.05 compared with the moderate group.
Figure 1Comparisons of BMD of patients with T2DN among three groups
Note: *P<0.05 compared with the VD group; #P<0.05 compared with the PIO group; &P<0.05 compared with the severe group; $P<0.05 compared with moderate group; VD + PIO, vitamin D plus pioglitazone hydrochloride.
Comparisons of bone metabolism parameters of patients with T2DN among three groups
| Group | OPG (μg/l) | iPTH (pg/ml) | BGP (ng/ml) | β-CTX (pg/ml) | PINP (ng/ml) | 25-OH-VD3 (ng/ml) | Pyr/Cr (pmol/μmol) | D-Pyr/Cr (pmol/μmol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild group | ||||||||
| VD | 3.67 ± 1.00 | 66.39 ± 7.59 | 16.10 ± 3.67 | 415.71 ± 50.43 | 36.99 ± 4.96 | 33.66 ± 8.07 | 54.91 ± 14.01 | 7.73 ± 1.48 |
| PIO | 2.77 ± 0.45* | 52.85 ± 6.82* | 12.54 ± 0.92* | 322.60 ± 67.47* | 51.33 ± 6.90* | 45.20 ± 5.69* | 41.99 ± 13.64* | 6.89 ± 1.45* |
| VD + PIO | 1.62 ± 0.58*†‡§ | 43.28 ± 4.09*†‡§ | 5.48 ± 1.95*†‡§ | 256.03 ± 45.88*†‡§ | 62.59 ± 6.15*†‡§ | 50.82 ± 7.38*†‡§ | 34.18 ± 8.91*†‡§ | 5.24 ± 1.08*†‡§ |
| Moderate group | ||||||||
| VD | 4.42 ± 0.63 | 89.94 ± 14.16 | 16.92 ± 3.23 | 438.92 ± 63.58 | 27.06 ± 5.27 | 17.88 ± 4.84 | 66.12 ± 11.75 | 8.49 ± 1.64 |
| PIO | 3.59 ± 0.78* | 66.45 ± 5.99* | 14.33 ± 3.66* | 345.50 ± 31.16* | 40.62 ± 5.26* | 27.01 ± 5.84* | 58.02 ± 7.99* | 7.40 ± 0.87* |
| VD + PIO | 2.28 ± 1.05*†‡ | 50.91 ± 8.80*†‡ | 8.80 ± 1.39*†‡ | 292.12 ± 41.37*†‡ | 50.98 ± 8.80*†‡ | 42.77 ± 4.20*†‡ | 47.87 ± 8.46*†‡ | 6.18 ± 1.41*†‡ |
| Severe group | ||||||||
| VD | 5.72 ± 0.46 | 190.14 ± 23.02 | 18.77 ± 2.52 | 509.57 ± 62.30 | 12.43 ± 2.95 | 11.12 ± 3.34 | 74.74 ± 10.02 | 10.58 ± 1.05 |
| PIO | 4.32 ± 0.29* | 116.28 ± 9.08* | 16.14 ± 2.86* | 388.53 ± 57.39* | 26.14 ± 5.79* | 20.33 ± 5.93* | 67.42 ± 8.97* | 8.85 ± 1.35* |
| VD + PIO | 2.92 ± 0.56*† | 75.49 ± 4.92*† | 12.37 ± 1.31*† | 341.30 ± 52.88*† | 37.37 ± 13.67*† | 36.57 ± 9.33*† | 56.96 ± 8.44*† | 7.06 ± 1.36*† |
Note: *P<0.05 compared with the VD group; †P<0.05 compared with the PIO group; ‡P<0.05 compared with the severe group; §P<0.05 compared with the moderate group; VD + PIO, vitamin D plus pioglitazone hydrochloride.
Figure 2Comparisons of bone metabolism parameters of patients with T2DN among three groups
Note: *P<0.05 compared with the VD group; #P<0.05 compared with the PIO group; &P<0.05 compared with the severe group; $P<0.05 compared with the moderate group; VD + PIO, vitamin D plus pioglitazone hydrochloride.
Correlations of OPG level with bone metabolism parameters of T2DN patients
| Indicator | OPG level | |
|---|---|---|
| Disease severity of T2DN | 0.597 | <0.001 |
| Disease course | 0.378 | <0.001 |
| TC | 0.158 | 0.157 |
| Blood calcium | −0.365 | <0.001 |
| Serum phosphorus | 0.455 | <0.001 |
| FPG | 0.245 | 0.027 |
| HbAlc | 0.345 | 0.002 |
| Serum creatine | 0.506 | <0.001 |
Figure 3Correlations of OPG level with bone metabolism parameters of T2DN patients
Note: Ca, serum calcium; P, serum phosphorus; Cr, serum creatine.