Literature DB >> 28153866

Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and harm in Emergency Medical Services.

Ian Lucas Howard1, James Marcus Bowen1, Loua Asad Hanna Al Shaikh1, Kedar Shrikrishna Mate2, Robert Campbell Owen1, David Michael Williams3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse event(AE) detection in healthcare has traditionally relied upon several methods including: patient care documentation review, mortality and morbidity review, voluntary reporting, direct observation and complaint systems. A novel sampling strategy, known as the trigger tool (TT) methodology, has been shown to provide a more robust and valid method of detection. The aim of this research was to develop and assess a TT specific to ground-based Emergency Medical Services, to identify cases with the potential risk for adverse events and harm.
METHODS: The study was conducted between March and December 2015. A literature review identified 57 potential triggers, which were grouped together by experts using an affinity process. Triggers for other areas of potential AE/harm were additionally considered for inclusion. An interim TT consisting of nine triggers underwent five iterative rounds of derivation tests of 20 random patient care records (n=100) in two emergency medical services. A final eight-item trigger list underwent a large sample (n=9836) assessment of test characteristics.
RESULTS: The final eight-item TT consisted of triggers divided amongst four categories: Clinical, Medication, Procedural and Return-Call. The TT demonstrated an AE identification rate of 41.5% (sensitivity 79.8% (95% CI, 69.9% to 87.6%); specificity 58.5% (95% CI, 52% to 64.8%)). When identifying potential risk for harm, the TT demonstrated a harm identification rate of 19.3% (sensitivity 97.1% (95% CI, 84.7% to 99.9%); specificity 53.5% (95% CI, 47.7% to 59.3%)). DISCUSSION: The Emergency Medical Services Trigger Tool (EMSTT) may be used as a sampling strategy similar to the Global Trigger Tool, to identify and measure AE and harm over time, and monitor the success of improvement initiatives within the Emergency Medical Services setting. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Event; Ambulance; Emergency Medical Service; Harm; Paramedic; Patient Safety; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153866     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  13 in total

1.  Development of an Electronic Trigger to Identify Delayed Follow-up HbA1c Testing for Patients with Uncontrolled Diabetes.

Authors:  Brianna Knoll; Leora I Horwitz; Kira Garry; Jeanne McCloskey; Arielle R Nagler; Himali Weerahandi; Wei-Yi Chung; Saul Blecker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Application of the emergency medical services trigger tool to measure adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a time series analysis.

Authors:  Ian Howard; Bernard Pillay; Nicholas Castle; Loua Al Shaikh; Robert Owen; David Williams
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-26

3.  Adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a trigger tool study.

Authors:  Magnus Andersson Hagiwara; Carl Magnusson; Johan Herlitz; Elin Seffel; Christer Axelsson; Monica Munters; Anneli Strömsöe; Lena Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-24

4.  Prehospital Point-Of-Care Lactate Increases the Prognostic Accuracy of National Early Warning Score 2 for Early Risk Stratification of Mortality: Results of a Multicenter, Observational Study.

Authors:  Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; Raúl López-Izquierdo; Juan F Delgado Benito; Ancor Sanz-García; Carlos Del Pozo Vegas; Miguel Ángel Castro Villamor; José Luis Martín-Conty; Guillermo J Ortega
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Understanding quality systems in the South African prehospital emergency medical services: a multiple exploratory case study.

Authors:  Ian Howard; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Maaret Castrén; Veronica Lindström
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-05

6.  Multicenter Test of an Emergency Department Trigger Tool for Detecting Adverse Events.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Brian R Sharp; Jeff Pothof; Marie C Vrablik; Nic Granzella; Alexandre A Todorov; Lee Adler
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Trigger Tools for Adverse Event Detection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Brian Sharp
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.243

8.  Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.

Authors:  Marléne Lindblad; Kristina Schildmeijer; Lena Nilsson; Mirjam Ekstedt; Maria Unbeck
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Ashley Nd Meyer; Dean F Sittig; Derek W Meeks; Eric J Thomas; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Using trigger tools to identify triage errors by ambulance dispatch nurses in Sweden: an observational study.

Authors:  Douglas Spangler; Lennart Edmark; Ulrika Winblad; Jessica Colldén-Benneck; Helena Borg; Hans Blomberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.