| Literature DB >> 28153792 |
Kennedy Makola Mbanzulu1, Roger Wumba2, Jean-Pierre Kambala Mukendi3, Josué Kikana Zanga3, Fortunate Shija4, Thierry Lengu Bobanga2, Michel Ntetani Aloni5, Gerald Misinzo4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diseases caused by mosquito-borne viruses are among the most important emerging diseases that threaten human and animal health, particularly in Africa. However, little attention has been paid to these diseases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The present cross-sectional study was undertaken between March and May 2014 to investigate the presence of mosquito-borne viruses in mosquitoes collected from five municipalities of Kinshasa, DRC.Entities:
Keywords: Arboviruses; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Kinshasa; Mosquito-borne viruses; Mosquitoes
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28153792 PMCID: PMC5384432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.01.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Infect Dis ISSN: 1201-9712 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Map of Kinshasa showing the mosquito sampling locations. Adult mosquitoes were collected from Kimwenza (Mount Ngafula municipality), Kingabwa (Limete municipality), Area 8 and 9 (Ndjili municipality), Nsanga and Mokali (Kimbanseke municipality), and Ngaba market (Ngaba municipality). The insert shows the location of Kinshasa City in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Different species of mosquitoes and their abundance at each of the sampling sites in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
| Genus | Kimwenza | Kingabwa | Kimbanseke | Ndjili | Ngaba | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 672 | 304 | 349 | 554 | 107 | 1986 | |
| 118 | 80 | 98 | 77 | 258 | 631 | |
| 97 | 23 | 71 | 64 | 28 | 283 | |
| 4 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 22 | |
| Total | 891 | 413 | 528 | 697 | 393 | 2922 |
Mosquito-borne viruses screened using reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in adult female mosquito pools collected from different locations within Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congoa.
| Location | Mosquito genus | CHIKV | ONNV | YFV | RVFV | DENV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimbanseke | – | – | – | – | |||||
| ± | ± | ± | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | + | + | – | + | – | – | |||
| ± | ± | – | – | ||||||
| Kingabwa | – | – | – | – | |||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| ± | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Ndjili | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | |||||
| – | – | – | |||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| + | + | + | + | – | – | + | – | ||
| Kimwenza | – | – | – | – | |||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| ± | ± | ± | – | ||||||
| ± | ± | – | – | ||||||
| Ngaba | ± | ± | – | – | |||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | ||||||
| Control | Dengue | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| RNase-free water | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
CHIKV, chikungunya virus; ONNV, o’nyong’nyong virus; YFV, yellow fever virus; RVFV, Rift Valley fever virus; DENV, dengue virus.
+, strongly positive reaction; −, negative reaction; ±, weakly positive reaction.
Dengue was used as the positive control, while RNase-free water was used as the negative control.
Figure 2Detection of chikungunya and o’nyong’nyong viruses in female mosquito pools collected in Kinshasa. Amplification of chikungunya and o’nyong’nyong viruses using reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the 5′ non-translated region. The expected PCR product size for chikungunya was 98 base pairs, while it was 80 base pairs for o’nyong’nyong virus. NC: negative control; LD: ladder. Lane numbers indicate the pool identity.