Literature DB >> 28153697

Assessment of airborne bacteria and noroviruses in air emission from a new highly-advanced hospital wastewater treatment plant.

K Uhrbrand1, A C Schultz2, A J Koivisto3, U Nielsen4, A M Madsen3.   

Abstract

Exposure to bioaerosols can pose a health risk to workers at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and to habitants of their surroundings. The main objective of this study was to examine the presence of harmful microorganisms in the air emission from a new type of hospital WWTP employing advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Air particle measurements and sampling of inhalable bacteria, endotoxin and noroviruses (NoVs) were performed indoor at the WWTP and outside at the WWTP ventilation air exhaust, downwind of the air exhaust, and upwind of the WWTP. No significant differences were seen in particle and endotoxin concentrations between locations. Bacterial concentrations were comparable or significantly lower in the exhaust air than inside the WWTP and in the upwind reference. Bacterial isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. In total, 35 different bacterial genera and 64 bacterial species were identified in the air samples. Significantly higher genus and species richness was found with an Andersen Cascade Impactor compared with filter-based sampling. No pathogenic bacteria were found in the exhaust air. Streptomyces was the only bacterium found in the air both inside the WWTP and at the air emission, but not in the upwind reference. NoV genomes were detected in the air inside the WWTP and at the air exhaust, albeit in low concentrations. As only traces of NoV genomes could be detected in the exhaust air they are unlikely to pose a health risk to surroundings. Hence, we assess the risk of airborne exposure to pathogenic bacteria and NoVs from the WWTP air emission to surroundings to be negligible. However, as a slightly higher NoV concentration was detected inside the WWTP, we cannot exclude the possibility that exposure to airborne NoVs can pose a health risk to susceptible to workers inside the WWTP, although the risk may be low.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Air sampling; Bioaerosols; Microbial diversity; Norovirus; Wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153697     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  11 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal variations of airborne bacteria from the municipal wastewater treatment plant: a case study in Ahvaz, Iran.

Authors:  Nastaran Talepour; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand; Effat Abbasi-Montazeri; Seyed Mahmoud Latifi; Neamat Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  Molecular detection and genotypic characterization of enteric adenoviruses in a hospital wastewater.

Authors:  Chourouk Ibrahim; Abdennaceur Hassen; Pierre Pothier; Selma Mejri; Salah Hammami
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  What are the disease burden and its sensitivity analysis of workers exposing to Staphylococcus aureus bioaerosol during warm and cold periods in a wastewater treatment plant?

Authors:  Jiaxin Ma; Dongzi An; Beibei Cui; Manli Liu; Hao Zhu; Ming Li; Xiaojun Ai; Wajid Ali; Cheng Yan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  The Optimization of Methods for the Collection of Aerosolized Murine Norovirus.

Authors:  Corey Boles; Grant Brown; Jae Hong Park; Matthew Nonnenmann
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Airborne MRSA and Total Staphylococcus aureus as Associated With Particles of Different Sizes on Pig Farms.

Authors:  Anne Mette Madsen; Iman Kurdi; Louise Feld; Kira Tendal
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Antibiotic Resistance of Airborne Viable Bacteria and Size Distribution in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Wendy Beatriz Morgado-Gamero; Martha Mendoza Hernandez; Margarita Castillo Ramirez; Jhorma Medina-Altahona; Stephanie De La Hoz; Heidy Posso Mendoza; Alexander Parody; Elba C Teixeira; Dayana Milena Agudelo-Castañeda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comparison of culturable antibiotic-resistant bacteria in polluted and non-polluted air in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yixin Mao; Pei Ding; Youbin Wang; Cheng Ding; Liping Wu; Ping Zheng; Xiao Zhang; Xia Li; Leyao Wang; Zongke Sun
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  A short review of bioaerosol emissions from gas bioreactors: Health threats, influencing factors and control technologies.

Authors:  Xu-Rui Hu; Meng-Fei Han; Can Wang; Nan-Yang Yang; Yong-Chao Wang; Er-Hong Duan; Hsing-Cheng Hsi; Ji-Guang Deng
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Possible environmental transmission, detection, persistence and fate during wastewater and water treatment.

Authors:  Sanjeeb Mohapatra; N Gayathri Menon; Gayatree Mohapatra; Lakshmi Pisharody; Aryamav Pattnaik; N Gowri Menon; Prudhvi Lal Bhukya; Manjita Srivastava; Meenakshi Singh; Muneesh Kumar Barman; Karina Yew-Hoong Gin; Suparna Mukherji
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Quantitative microbial risk assessment for occupational health of temporary entrants and staffs equipped with various grade PPE and exposed to microbial bioaerosols in two WWTPs.

Authors:  Cheng Yan; Ya-Li Leng; Jun-Ting Wu
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.