Literature DB >> 28153582

Changing trends in antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates in a burn unit.

Narendra Pal Singh1, Mayuri Rani2, Kavita Gupta3, Tanu Sagar4, Iqbal Rajinder Kaur5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Emerging antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial bacterial isolates, limits the available treatment options for burn wound infections, among them multi-drug resistant Gram negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are major contributors to the increase in morbidity and mortality rates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was done in the Department of Microbiology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi. A total of 818 wound samples from patients admitted in the burn wards and Intensive Care Units (ICUs) examined between 2010-2014 (5 years period). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found as the most common isolate (37%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (15%) and Acinetobacter baumanii (12%) among Gram negative organisms while S. aureus (12%) remained the major isolates among Gram positive organisms. A significant decrease in incidence of Gram positive organisms was observed in comparison with previous study. However, resistance to ceftazidime and aminoglycosides were increased significantly in Gram negative organisms. Multi-drug resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR PA) accounted for 15.2%, multi-drug resistant A. baumanii (MDR AB) was prevalent in 13.8% and MRSA in 77.4% of burn wound infections. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Emerging bacterial drug resistance has both clinical and financial implications for the therapy of infected burn patients. Spectrum of bacterial drug resistance in an institution is important for epidemiological as well as clinical purposes. Rising frequency of MDR strains in burn patients is alarming for clinicians as it downgrades the treatment efficacy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiogram; Burn infections; Multi-drug resistant isolates; Therapeutic options

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153582     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management and prevention of drug resistant infections in burn patients.

Authors:  Roohi Vinaik; Dalia Barayan; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.091

2. 

Authors:  S Frigui; Y Bourbiaa; A Mokline; H Naija; A A Messadi; L Thabet
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-03-31

3. 

Authors:  A Krir; S Dhraief; A A Messadi; L Thabet
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Isolation and Identification of Some Bacteria Contemn in Burn Wounds in Misan, Iraq.

Authors:  R Rahim Hateet
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Patterns of multidrug resistant organism acquisition in an adult specialist burns service: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Heather Cleland; Lincoln M Tracy; Alex Padiglione; Andrew J Stewardson
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.454

6.  Incidence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in burn intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tahir Mehmood Khan; Yee Leng Kok; Allah Bukhsh; Learn-Han Lee; Kok-Gan Chan; Bey-Hing Goh
Journal:  Germs       Date:  2018-09-03

7.  Chitosan-Gentamicin Conjugate Hydrogel Promoting Skin Scald Repair.

Authors:  Tingting Yan; Songzhi Kong; Qianqian Ouyang; Chengpeng Li; Tingting Hou; Yu Chen; Sidong Li
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Predicting and managing sepsis in burn patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Omar Nunez Lopez; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Ludwik K Branski; William B Norbury; David N Herndon
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.