Literature DB >> 28153347

Impact of Pulmonary Arterial Clot Location on Pulmonary Embolism Treatment and Outcomes (90 Days).

C Charles Jain1, Yuchiao Chang2, Christopher Kabrhel3, Jay Giri4, Richard Channick5, Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez5, Rachel P Rosovsky6, Annemarie Fogerty6, Kenneth Rosenfield7, Michael R Jaff7, Ido Weinberg7.   

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is common and management is based on risk stratification. The significance of clot location in submassive and massive PE is unclear. Data from a prospectively gathered database of submassive and massive PE were used for analysis. Available data included patient presentation, diagnostics, treatment, and outcome. Comparisons were made according to clot location: central or peripheral. A multivariable model was used for composite outcome of death or right ventricular (RV) strain at 90 days. Among 269 patients, there were no significant demographic differences between patients with peripheral and central PE. Peripheral PE was more likely to present with hypotension (46.4% vs 32.6%; p = 0.02), but central PE was more likely to have RV strain on echocardiography (76.7% vs 57.7%, p <0.001) and computed tomography (58.1% vs 32.0%, p <0.0001). Peripheral PE was more likely to receive anticoagulation as the only form of therapy (69.1% vs 55.8%; p = 0.03), and central PE was more likely to receive catheter-directed therapies (18.3% vs 3.3%; p <0.001). Nonetheless, peripheral PE had higher 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality (18.5% vs 9.3%; p = 0.03; 25.9% vs 13.5%; p = 0.02, respectively). In a multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of death or RV strain at 90 days was increased age (odds radio 1.35, CI 1.06 to 1.72 per 10 years). Specifically, neither clot location nor treatment was associated with patient outcomes. In conclusion, in this cohort of patients with submassive and massive PE, clot location was associated with treatment patterns but not patient outcomes to 90 days. Reevaluation of practice is thus warranted.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28153347     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Metabolomic analysis of 92 pulmonary embolism patients from a nested case-control study identifies metabolites associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Authors:  O A Zeleznik; E M Poole; S Lindstrom; P Kraft; A Van Hylckama Vlieg; J A Lasky-Su; L B Harrington; K Hagan; J Kim; B A Parry; N Giordano; C Kabrhel
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  A visualized pulmonary arterial thrombus by using a modified echocardiographic view in an intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism patient: A case report.

Authors:  Guanyu Mu; Feixue Li; Xiaolin Chen; Bo Zhao; Guangping Li; Huaying Fu
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 3.  Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Connor Tice; Matthew Seigerman; Paul Fiorilli; Steven C Pugliese; Sameer Khandhar; Jay Giri; Taisei Kobayashi
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2020-10-06

4.  Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 and value of D-dimer assessment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Hugo J A Adams; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effect of platelet inhibitors on thrombus burden in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Joseph Van Galen; Libia Pava; Colin Wright; Ayman Elbadawi; Annelise Hamer; Abhishek Chaturvedi; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.862

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.