Literature DB >> 28153061

Trajectories of Stroke Care in Ontario: Which Path to Best Care?

Ruth E Hall1, Diana Sondergaard2, Walter P Wodchis1, Jiming Fang1, Prosanta Mondal1, Mark T Bayley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have tracked stroke survivors through transitions across the health system and identified the most common trajectories and quality of care received. The objectives of our study were to examine the trajectories that incident stroke patients experience and to quantify the extent to which their care adhered to the best practices for stroke care.
METHODS: A population-based cohort of first-ever stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients from the 2012/13 Ontario Stroke Audit was linked to administrative databases using an encrypted health card number to identify dominant trajectories (N=12,362). All trajectories began in the emergency department (ED) and were defined by the transitions that followed immediately after the ED. Quality indicators were calculated to quantify best practice adherence within trajectories.
RESULTS: Six trajectories of stroke care were identified with significant variability in patient characteristics and quality of care received. Almost two-thirds (64.5%) required hospital admission. Trajectories that only involved the ED had the lowest rates of brain and carotid artery imaging (91.5 and 44.2%, respectively). Less than 20% of patients in trajectories involving hospital admissions received care on a stroke unit. The trajectory involving inpatient rehabilitation received suboptimal secondary prevention measures.
CONCLUSIONS: There are six main trajectories stroke patients follow, and adherence to best practices varies by trajectory. Trajectories resulting in patients being transitioned to home care following ED management only are least likely and those including inpatient rehabilitation are most likely to receive stroke best practices. Increased time in facility-based care results in greater access to best practices. Stroke patients receiving only ED care require closer follow-up by stroke specialists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute stroke; TIA; clinical practice guidelines; quality of care; stroke registry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28153061     DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2016.440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0317-1671            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  An international comparison of long-term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture.

Authors:  Walter P Wodchis; Zeynep Or; Carl Rudolf Blankart; Femke Atsma; Nils Janlov; Yu Qing Bai; Anne Penneau; Mina Arvin; Hannah Knight; Kristen Riley; Jose F Figueroa; Irene Papanicolas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A register-based study comparing planned rehabilitation following acute stroke in 2011 and 2017.

Authors:  Malin C Nylén; Hanna C Persson; Tamar Abzhandadze; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 16.859

4.  Referral-based transition to subsequent rehabilitation at home after stroke: one-year outcomes and use of healthcare services.

Authors:  Sebastian Lindblom; Malin Tistad; Maria Flink; Ann Charlotte Laska; Lena von Koch; Charlotte Ytterberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.908

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.