Literature DB >> 28152558

Strong subsite-specific variation in detecting advanced adenomas by fecal immunochemical testing for hemoglobin.

Hermann Brenner1,2,3, Tobias Niedermaier1, Hongda Chen1.   

Abstract

Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are increasingly recommended and used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to provide a detailed assessment of the sensitivity of FIT according to type and subsite of neoplasms in a true screening setting. A quantitative FIT (FOB Gold, Sentinel Diagnostics, Milano, Italy) was applied prior to colonoscopy by 3,466 participants of the German screening colonoscopy program. Subsite specific sensitivity for various types of colorectal neoplasms was derived by comparing FIT results with findings at screening colonoscopy. The most advanced finding at colonoscopy was CRC, advanced adenoma, and nonadvanced adenoma in 29, 354 and 686 cases, respectively. Per-adenoma sensitivity for large advanced adenomas (>1 cm) strongly varied by location (p < 0.001): cecum: 0/14 (0%), ascending colon and right flexure: 11/43 (26%), transverse colon and left flexure: 2/14 (14%), descending colon: 7/12 (58%), sigmoid colon: 47/92 (51%), rectum: 14/39 (36%). By contrast, the FIT detected all of 5 proximal CRC and 23 out of 24 (96%) distal CRCs, whereas per-adenoma sensitivity of both proximal (17/259, 7%) and distal nonadvanced adenomas (20/237, 8%) essentially equaled the false positivity rate among those without neoplasms (152/2,397, 6%). In conclusion, we found a very large gradient of subsite specific FIT sensitivity for detecting large advanced adenomas ranging from 0% for advanced adenomas located in the cecum to >50% for those located in the descending or sigmoid colon. By contrast, FIT sensitivity was uniformly excellent for CRC and uniformly poor for nonadvanced adenomas, regardless of their location.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenomas; colorectal cancer screening; fecal immunochemical test; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28152558     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Lisanne M Vendrig; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  American Indian/Alaska Native and black colon cancer patients have poorer cause-specific survival based on disease stage and anatomic site of diagnosis.

Authors:  V Shane Pankratz; Mikaela Kosich; Nicholas Edwardson; Kevin English; Prajakta Adsul; Yiting Li; Gulshan Parasher; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Calibrating Natural History of Cancer Models in the Presence of Data Incompatibility: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Chloe Thomas; Sophie Whyte; James Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.558

4.  Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.

Authors:  Maaike Buskermolen; Andrea Gini; Steffie K Naber; Esther Toes-Zoutendijk; Harry J de Koning; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Joanne E Schottinger; Wei K Zhao; Jessica Chubak; Ethan Halm; Nirupa R Ghai; Richard Contreras; Celette Skinner; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Characteristics of Advanced Colorectal Cancer Detected by Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening in Participants with a Negative Result the Previous Year.

Authors:  Ryosuke Hasegawa; Kazuo Yashima; Yuichiro Ikebuchi; Shuji Sasaki; Akira Yoshida; Koichiro Kawaguchi; Hajime Isomoto
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 1.641

8.  Fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin in combination with fecal transferrin in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Anton Gies; Katarina Cuk; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Tracking the Antibody Immunome in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer by Using Antigen Self-Assembled Protein Arrays.

Authors:  María González-González; José María Sayagués; Luis Muñoz-Bellvís; Carlos Eduardo Pedreira; Marcello L R de Campos; Jacinto García; José Antonio Alcázar; Patrick F Braz; Breno L Galves; Luis Miguel González; Oscar Bengoechea; María Del Mar Abad; Juan Jesús Cruz; Lorena Bellido; Emilio Fonseca; Paula Díez; Pablo Juanes-Velasco; Alicia Landeira-Viñuela; Quentin Lecrevisse; Enrique Montalvillo; Rafael Góngora; Oscar Blanco; José Manuel Sánchez-Santos; Joshua LaBaer; Alberto Orfao; Manuel Fuentes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Jennifer S Lin; Kathryn E Bouskill
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.