| Literature DB >> 28152517 |
Romina Salpini1, Matteo Surdo1, Nadia Warner2, Maria Francesca Cortese1, Danny Colledge2, Sally Soppe2, Maria Concetta Bellocchi1, Daniele Armenia1, Luca Carioti1, Fabio Continenza3, Domenico Di Carlo1, Patrizia Saccomandi1, Carmen Mirabelli1,4, Michela Pollicita1, Roberta Longo5, Sara Romano5, Giuseppina Cappiello5, Alberto Spanò5, Pascale Trimoulet6, Herve Fleury6, Jacopo Vecchiet7, Nerio Iapadre8, Angelo Barlattani9, Ada Bertoli1, Terenzio Mari10, Caterina Pasquazzi11, Gabriele Missale12, Cesare Sarrecchia13, Elisa Orecchini14, Alessandro Michienzi14, Massimo Andreoni13, Simona Francioso15, Mario Angelico15, Jens Verheyen15, Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein1, Stephen Locarnini2, Carlo Federico Perno1, Valentina Svicher1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An impaired HBsAg-secretion can increase HBV oncogenic-properties. Here, we investigate genetic-determinants in HBsAg correlated with HBV-induced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and their impact on HBsAg-secretion and cell-proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: HBsAg mutations; cell proliferation; hepatitis B; hepatitis B surface antigen; hepatocellular carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28152517 PMCID: PMC5362517 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Characteristics of the study population
| Patients’ characteristics | HCC patients(N=23) | Control patients(N=105) |
|---|---|---|
| Male, N(%) | 21 (91.7) | 80 (76.2) |
| Italian Nationality, N(%) | 16 (69.6) | 89 (84.8) |
| Median Age [Years] (IQR) | 63 (53-70) | 51 (41-65) |
| HBeAg negative, N(%)a | 14 (77.8) | 62 (78.5) |
| Median HBV-DNA [log IU/ml] (IQR) | 4.0 (2.1-6.5) | 4.1 (3.1-5.4) |
| Median ALT [IU/L] (IQR) | 82 (28-112) | 49 (29-90) |
| Median AST [IU/L] (IQR) | 50 (33-139) | 35 (23-58) |
| D, N(%) | 17 (73.9) | 76 (72.4) |
| A, N(%) | 6 (26.1) | 29 (27.6) |
| None, N(%) | 9 (39.1) | 45 (42.9) |
| LMV, N(%) | 6 (26.1) | 30 (28.6) |
| ETV, N(%) | 3 (13.0) | 3 (2.9) |
| TDF, N(%) | 3 (13.0) | 15 (14.3) |
| ADV, N(%) | 1 (4.4) | 9 (8.6) |
| LMV+ADV, N(%) | 1 (4.4) | 3 (2.9) |
| Single Nodule HCC, N(%) | 14 (60.9) | |
| Multifocal-HCC, N(%) | 7 (30.4) | |
| Unknown, N(%) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Median size of each HCC nodule [cm] (IQR) | 5 (2.5-7.6) | |
| 519 (6.2-13,012) | ||
| Yes, N(%) | 5 (21.7) | |
| No, N(%) | 14 (60.9) | |
| Unknown, N(%) | 4 (17.4) | |
| Yes, N(%) | 7 (30.4) | |
| No, N(%) | 7 (30.4) | |
| Unknown, N(%) | 9 (39.2) | |
| TACE, N(%) | 8 (34.8) | |
| Surgical resection, N(%) | 4 (17.4) | |
| Thermoablation, N(%) | 2 (8.7) | |
| No, N(%) | 3 (13.0) | |
| Unknown, N(%) | 6 (26.1) | |
| Diagnosis of cirrhosis, N(%) | 15 (65.2) | |
| A, N(%) | 11 (47.8) | |
| B, N(%) | 6 (26.1) | |
| C, N(%) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Unknown, N(%) | 4 (17.4) |
a The percentages were calculated on 18 HCC and 79 control patients with an available HBeAg status.
Abbreviations: HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; HBeAg, Hepatitis B “e” antigen; ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase; AST, aspartare aminotrasferase; TACE, Transcatheter arterial Chemoembolisation; LMV, lamivudine; ETV, entecavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ADV, adefovir.
Figure 1The histogram reports the prevalence of sP203Q, sS210R, and sP203Q+sS210R in 23 HBV-induced HCC patients and in 105 chronically HBV-infected patients (CHB patients) (used as reference group)
Statistically significant differences were assessed by Fisher Exact Test. * P <0.05, ** P <0.01.
Multivariate analysis: factors associated with HCC
| Variablesa | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crude OR [95% CI] | p-value | adjusted OR [95% CI] | p-value | |
| 0.30 (0.07-1.39) | 0.125 | 0.27 (0.04-1.96) | 0.197 | |
| 0.96 (0.84-1.09) | 0.499 | 0.99 (0.83-1.18) | 0.902 | |
| 0.98 (0.77-1.25) | 0.857 | 0.91 (0.66-1.26) | 0.588 | |
| 0.98 (0.97-1.01) | 0.993 | 0.99 (0.98-1.01) | 0.212 | |
| 1.01 (0.98-1.02) | 0.422 | 1.01 (0.99-1.03) | 0.188 | |
| 0.92 (0.33-2.58) | 0.881 | 0.85 (0.19-3.73) | 0.826 | |
a The logistic regression analysis was performed on 128 chronically HBV-infected patients with or without HCC. The following variables were considered: gender, year of sample collection, age, HBV-DNA log10, ALT, AST, HBV genotype, at least one mutation associated with HCC.
b Reference group
Figure 2The graph reports the intra-patient prevalence of sP203Q (white dots), sS210R (grey dots), sP203Q+sS210R (black dots) for each patient in the HCC group (N=13) A. and in the group of chronically-infected patients used as reference (N=27) B. Intra-patient prevalence was expressed as % of reads with the specific mutation. The grey area includes mutations with an intra-patient prevalence <20%, not detected by standard population-based sequencing, and thus defined as minority species.
Figure 3A. The histogram reports HBsAg secretion factor for the wild-type virus and for mutants carrying P203Q, S210R and P203Q+S210R. Secretion factor is defined as the ratio of extracellular to intracellular HBsAg amount determined by the Alexxis assay. Average of 3 experiments +/− SEM are shown. Statistically significant differences were assessed by 2-tailed unpaired T-test. *P <0.05 **P <0.01, ***P <0.005. B. The histogram reports the percentage of cells in S-phase of cell cycle for wild-type and mutants at 7 days post transfection determined by FACS analysis, selecting GFP+ HepG2 cells. Statistical analysis was assessed by Chi-Square Test based on 2×2 contingency table. *P <0.001