Literature DB >> 2815251

Comparative evaluation of urographic contrast media, inulin, and 99mTc-DTPA clearance methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate in clinical transplantation.

R Lewis1, N Kerr, C Van Buren, P Lowry, C Sandler, O H Frazier, P Powers, J Herson, J Corriere, R Kerman.   

Abstract

Plasma clearance of inulin (Cin), 99mTc-DTPA (CDTPA), and urographic contrast media (CCM) were determined simultaneously in 31 patients with varying levels of renal function evaluated in the setting of affiliated cardiac and renal transplantation programs. Cin and CDTPA were calculated from the ratio of simultaneously measured plasma concentration and urine excretion rate of these test agents (UxV/P). CCM was derived from x-ray fluorescence measurement of plasma iodine (PI) content following intravenous injection of 50 ml of nonionic, low-osmolar contrast media (180 mg I/ml). Urine collections were not required for CCM determinations. No adverse reactions attributable to CM occurred in any patient, and follow-up serum-creatinine values did not differ significantly from prestudy levels. CCM determined from the rate of decline in PI between 3 hr and 4 hr following administration of contrast media ("slope-intercept" technique) [Ccm-SI] correlated closely with corresponding levels of Cin (r = .86, P less than 0.0001). and CDTPA (r = 0.89, P less than 0.0001). Mean CCM-SI/Cin and CCM-SI/CDTPA ratios for the entire study cohort were 1.09 +/- 0.06 and 1.08 +/- 0.06, respectively. CCM-SI determinations also correlated well with CCM levels derived from a single measurement of PI ("single sample" technique) made at 3 hr following injection of contrast media (r = 0.94, P less than 0.0001). Both CCM-SI and CCM determined by the "single sample" method (CCM-3 degrees SS) tended to overestimate Cin and CDTPA, however, when the latter were less than 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 (mean CCM-SI/Cin and Ccm-3 degrees SS/Cin ratios 1.36 +/- 0.14 and 1.95 +/- 1.0, respectively. Reproducibility was evaluated by paired comparison of 3-hr vs. 4-hr "single sample" CCM determinations (r = 0.99, P less than 0.0001). In addition, analysis of the variation in iodine content between duplicate specimens obtained at each of these time intervals revealed a mean ratio of 1.0 +/- 0.01 (P = NS vs. identity). Contrast clearance determination utilizing the slope-intercept method is accurate, safe, pragmatic, and more precise than serum-creatinine and endogenous-creatinine clearance for measurement of renal function in clinical transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2815251     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198911000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Accurate measurement of individual glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  Karin Holweger; Carsten Bokemeyer; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Cystatin C is a biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Authors:  Zhi-Hong Wan; Jian-Jun Wang; Shao-Li You; Hong-Ling Liu; Bing Zhu; Hong Zang; Chen Li; Jing Chen; Shao-Jie Xin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Routine determination of GFR in renal transplant recipients by HPLC quantification of plasma iohexol concentrations and comparison with estimated GFR.

Authors:  Stéphanie Castagnet; Hélène Blasco; Patrick Vourc'h; Isabelle Benz-De-Bretagne; Charlotte Veyrat-Durebex; Christelle Barbet; Azmi Alnajjar; Bénédicte Ribourtout; Matthias Buchler; Jean-Michel Halimi; Christian R Andres
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  The impact of interlaboratory differences in cystatin C assay measurement on glomerular filtration rate estimation.

Authors:  Christine A White; Andrew D Rule; Christine P Collier; Ayub Akbari; John C Lieske; Nathalie Lepage; Steve Doucette; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Glomerular filtration rate, 131I-hippuran clearance and estimated creatinine clearance in cancer patients.

Authors:  M W Lindegaard; N Aass; E S Bue; L Theodorsen; S D Fosså
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 1: How to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol?

Authors:  Pierre Delanaye; Natalie Ebert; Toralf Melsom; Flavio Gaspari; Christophe Mariat; Etienne Cavalier; Jonas Björk; Anders Christensson; Ulf Nyman; Esteban Porrini; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Piero Ruggenenti; Elke Schaeffner; Inga Soveri; Gunnar Sterner; Bjørn Odvar Eriksen; Sten-Erik Bäck
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2016-08-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.