Yu-Chun Yen1, Jer-Hwa Chang2,3, Wei-Cheng Lin4, Jeng-Fong Chiou5, Yin-Chun Chang4, Chia-Lun Chang6, Han-Lin Hsu2,3, Jyh-Ming Chow6, Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan7, Alexander T H Wu8, Szu-Yuan Wu9,10,11,12. 1. Biostatistics Center and School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. School of Respiratory Therapy, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Department of Hemato-Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 8. PhD Program for Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 9. Institute of Toxicology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 11. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 12. Department of Biotechnology, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the effectiveness of esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) who receive definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) through modern, intensity modulated-RT (IMRT) techniques. The therapeutic effects of esophagectomy in patients with TESCC were evaluated using modern clinical staging and RT techniques and suitable RT doses. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Patients were categorized into the following groups on the basis of treatment modality to compare their outcomes: group 1 received definitive CCRT, group 2 received neoadjuvant RT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥50 grays [Gy]), and group 3 receiving neoadjuvant CCRT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥ 50 Gy). The median total RT dose and fraction size were 50.4 Gy and 1.8 Gy per fraction, respectively. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 3123 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Patient ages 65 years and older, Charlson comorbidity index scores ≥3, advanced clinical stages (IIA-IIIC), alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking were identified as significant, independent poor prognostic risk factors for overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses. In group 3, after adjustment for confounders, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for overall mortality were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.93) for patients with clinical stage IIA disease, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.91) for those with clinical stage IIB disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55) for those with clinical stage IIIA disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.39-0.56) for those with clinical stage IIIB disease, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.57) for those with clinical stage IIIC disease. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy can be beneficial in patients with TESCC after definitive CCRT, especially in those who have advanced-stage disease. Cancer 2017;123:2043-2053.
BACKGROUND: Few large, prospective, randomized studies have investigated the effectiveness of esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) who receive definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) through modern, intensity modulated-RT (IMRT) techniques. The therapeutic effects of esophagectomy in patients with TESCC were evaluated using modern clinical staging and RT techniques and suitable RT doses. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from patients with TESCC from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Patients were categorized into the following groups on the basis of treatment modality to compare their outcomes: group 1 received definitive CCRT, group 2 received neoadjuvant RT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥50 grays [Gy]), and group 3 receiving neoadjuvant CCRT followed by esophagectomy (total IMRT dose, ≥ 50 Gy). The median total RT dose and fraction size were 50.4 Gy and 1.8 Gy per fraction, respectively. Group 1 was used as the control arm for investigating the risk of mortality after treatment. RESULTS: In total, 3123 patients who had TESCC without distant metastasis were enrolled. Patient ages 65 years and older, Charlson comorbidity index scores ≥3, advanced clinical stages (IIA-IIIC), alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking were identified as significant, independent poor prognostic risk factors for overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses. In group 3, after adjustment for confounders, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for overall mortality were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41-0.93) for patients with clinical stage IIA disease, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.91) for those with clinical stage IIB disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55) for those with clinical stage IIIA disease, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.39-0.56) for those with clinical stage IIIB disease, and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.57) for those with clinical stage IIIC disease. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy can be beneficial in patients with TESCC after definitive CCRT, especially in those who have advanced-stage disease. Cancer 2017;123:2043-2053.