Literature DB >> 28152148

Evaluation of a Minimally Disruptive Treatment Protocol for Frontal Sinus Fractures.

Sapna A Patel1, Angelique M Berens1, Karthik Devarajan2, Mark E Whipple1, Kris S Moe1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Despite common goals of frontal sinus fracture treatment (restoring forehead contour and creating a safe sinus), there remains significant variability in evaluation and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with a minimally disruptive treatment protocol for the treatment of frontal sinus fractures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of prospectively collected data from 2010 through 2015 at a level 1 trauma center. All patients with frontal sinus fractures treated with our protocol from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients with poor follow-up and/or incomplete medical records were excluded from analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presence of an aerated frontal sinus and aesthetically acceptable forehead contour. Secondary outcome measures were complications related to frontal sinus fractures.
RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were treated under our minimally disruptive protocol, and 25 patients were included in the study; 18 (72%) were male and 7 (28%) were female. Their ages ranged from 6 to 62 years. After review, 22 patients had both clinical and radiographic follow-up. No patients underwent immediate frontal sinus repair. Five of 22 patients underwent surgery for indications other than their frontal sinus fracture: 1 of 5 patients underwent immediate surgical repair due to bilateral LeFort fractures, and 4 of 5 underwent delayed surgery due to nasal polyps (1 patient), scar revision (1 patient), and concomitant LeFort fractures (2 patients). Two of 22 patients (9%) underwent frontal sinus repair after outpatient surveillance due to persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak (1 patient) and orbital roof fracture (1 patient). The remaining 20 patients were treated nonoperatively, and 19 of 20 (95%) had spontaneous improvement in opacification and/or contour deformity. Twelve of 20 patients (60%) had improvement or resolution in both. One patient had ongoing partial opacification and deformity at the 3-month follow-up but was asymptomatic and had bony contour that was aesthetically acceptable to the patient. There were no complications. The median of all follow-up was 3 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Frontal sinus fractures treated nonoperatively had a high rate of spontaneous ventilation and bony autoreduction with aesthetically acceptable frontal bone remodeling. There were no complications in the nonoperative group. The initial results of this study support further study of the safety and efficacy of a minimally disruptive protocol for frontal sinus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28152148      PMCID: PMC5539999          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  25 in total

Review 1.  Current advances in sinus preservation for the management of frontal sinus fractures.

Authors:  Trimartani Koento
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of facial fractures.

Authors:  Annette M Pham; E Bradley Strong
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Frontal sinus fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  E Bradley Strong
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

4.  Frontal sinus disease: 100 cases treated by osteoplastic operation.

Authors:  R D Zonis; W W Montgomery; R L Goodale
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Frontal sinus fractures: a conservative shift.

Authors:  William M Weathers; Erik M Wolfswinkel; Daniel A Hatef; Edward I Lee; Rodger H Brown; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-06-26

6.  Frontal sinus ablation by cranialization. Report of 21 cases.

Authors:  P J Donald
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1982-03

7.  The frontal sinus: a culprit or a victim? A review of 40 cases.

Authors:  Karim El Khatib; Alain Danino; Gabriel Malka
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Spontaneous ventilation of the frontal sinus after fractures involving the frontal recess.

Authors:  Aria Jafari; Brian A Nuyen; Courtni R Salinas; Alan M Smith; Adam S DeConde
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Endoscopic management of the frontal recess in frontal sinus fractures: a shift in the paradigm?

Authors:  Timothy L Smith; Joseph K Han; Todd A Loehrl; John S Rhee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Endoscopic approach to maxillofacial trauma.

Authors:  Warren Schubert; Kamrun Jenabzadeh
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  5 in total

1.  Endoscopic Orbital and Periorbital Approaches in Minimally Disruptive Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Craig Miller; Randall Bly; Kris S Moe
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-24

Review 2.  Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evolving Clinical Considerations and Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Mark A Arnold; Sherard A Tatum
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2019-02-04

Review 3.  Frontal Sinus Fractures.

Authors:  Dale J Podolsky; Kris S Moe
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  An Endonasal Incision Adds a Second Vector of Manipulation During Percutaneous Reduction of Fractures Involving the Frontonasal Region.

Authors:  Akshay Govind; Jonathan Jelmini
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-27

5.  Traumatic Frontal Sinus Fractures Management: Experience from High-Trauma Centre.

Authors:  Hieder Al-Shami; Ahmad K Alnemare; Turki Bin Mahfoz; Ahmed M Salah
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-03-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.