Jeanie L Cheong1, Lex W Doyle2, Alice C Burnett3, Katherine J Lee4, Jennifer M Walsh5, Cody R Potter6, Karli Treyvaud7, Deanne K Thompson8, Joy E Olsen9, Peter J Anderson10, Alicia J Spittle11. 1. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia4Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia4Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia5Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia6Paediatric Infant Perinatal Emergency Retrieval, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia7Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia. 8. Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia4Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia8Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia9Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia. 9. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 10. Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia4Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 11. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia2Victorian Infant Brain Studies, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia10Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
Importance: Moderate and late preterm (MLPT) births comprise most preterm infants. Therefore, long-term developmental concerns in this population potentially have a large public health influence. While there are increasing reports of developmental problems in MLPT children, detail is lacking on the precise domains that are affected. Objective: To compare neurodevelopment and social-emotional development between MLPT infants and term-born control infants at age 2 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigation was a prospective longitudinal cohort study at a single tertiary hospital. Participants were MLPT infants (32-36 weeks' completed gestation) and healthy full-term controls (≥37 weeks' gestation) recruited at birth. During a 3-year period between December 7, 2009, and November 7, 2012, MLPT infants were recruited at birth from the neonatal unit and postnatal wards of the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. The term control recruitment extended to March 26, 2014. The dates of the data developmental assessments were February 23, 2012, to April 8, 2016. Exposure: Moderate and late preterm birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cerebral palsy, blindness, and deafness assessed by a pediatrician; cognitive, language, and motor development assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (developmental delay was defined as less than -1 SD relative to the mean in controls in any domain of the scales); and social-emotional and behavioral problems assessed by a parent questionnaire (Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment). Outcomes were compared between birth groups using linear and logistic regression, adjusted for social risk. Results: In total, 198 MLPT infants (98.5% of 201 recruited) and 183 term-born controls (91.0% of 201 recruited) were assessed at 2 years' corrected age. Compared with controls, MLPT children had worse cognitive, language, and motor development at age 2 years, with adjusted composite score mean differences of -5.3 (95% CI, -8.2 to -2.4) for cognitive development, -11.4 (95% CI, -15.3 to -7.5) for language development, and -7.3 (95% CI, -10.6 to -3.9) for motor development. The odds of developmental delay were higher in the MLPT group compared with controls, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0) for cognitive delay, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8-5.2) for language delay, and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.5) for motor delay. Overall social-emotional competence was worse in MLPT children compared with controls (t statistic mean difference, -3.6 (95% CI, -5.8 to -1.4), but other behavioral domains were similar. The odds of being at risk for social-emotional competence were 3.9 (95% CI, 1.4-10.9) for MLPT children compared with controls. Conclusions and Relevance: Moderate and late preterm children exhibited developmental delay compared with their term-born peers, most marked in the language domain. This knowledge of developmental needs in MLPT infants will assist in targeting surveillance and intervention.
Importance: Moderate and late preterm (MLPT) births comprise most preterm infants. Therefore, long-term developmental concerns in this population potentially have a large public health influence. While there are increasing reports of developmental problems in MLPT children, detail is lacking on the precise domains that are affected. Objective: To compare neurodevelopment and social-emotional development between MLPT infants and term-born control infants at age 2 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigation was a prospective longitudinal cohort study at a single tertiary hospital. Participants were MLPT infants (32-36 weeks' completed gestation) and healthy full-term controls (≥37 weeks' gestation) recruited at birth. During a 3-year period between December 7, 2009, and November 7, 2012, MLPT infants were recruited at birth from the neonatal unit and postnatal wards of the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. The term control recruitment extended to March 26, 2014. The dates of the data developmental assessments were February 23, 2012, to April 8, 2016. Exposure: Moderate and late preterm birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cerebral palsy, blindness, and deafness assessed by a pediatrician; cognitive, language, and motor development assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Third Edition (developmental delay was defined as less than -1 SD relative to the mean in controls in any domain of the scales); and social-emotional and behavioral problems assessed by a parent questionnaire (Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment). Outcomes were compared between birth groups using linear and logistic regression, adjusted for social risk. Results: In total, 198 MLPT infants (98.5% of 201 recruited) and 183 term-born controls (91.0% of 201 recruited) were assessed at 2 years' corrected age. Compared with controls, MLPT children had worse cognitive, language, and motor development at age 2 years, with adjusted composite score mean differences of -5.3 (95% CI, -8.2 to -2.4) for cognitive development, -11.4 (95% CI, -15.3 to -7.5) for language development, and -7.3 (95% CI, -10.6 to -3.9) for motor development. The odds of developmental delay were higher in the MLPT group compared with controls, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0) for cognitive delay, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8-5.2) for language delay, and 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3-4.5) for motor delay. Overall social-emotional competence was worse in MLPT children compared with controls (t statistic mean difference, -3.6 (95% CI, -5.8 to -1.4), but other behavioral domains were similar. The odds of being at risk for social-emotional competence were 3.9 (95% CI, 1.4-10.9) for MLPT children compared with controls. Conclusions and Relevance: Moderate and late preterm children exhibited developmental delay compared with their term-born peers, most marked in the language domain. This knowledge of developmental needs in MLPT infants will assist in targeting surveillance and intervention.
Authors: Robin Sifre; Carolyn Lasch; Angela Fenoglio; Michael K Georgieff; Jason J Wolff; Jed T Elison Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jennifer E McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Melanie Schuijers; Evelyn S Tan; Felicity Painter; Alexandra Schnabel; Genevieve LeBas; Shelby Higgs-Howarth; Michelle Benstead; Anna T Booth; Delyse Hutchinson Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2021-06-14
Authors: Rula Nassar; Antonia N Kaczkurkin; Cedric Huchuan Xia; Aristeidis Sotiras; Marieta Pehlivanova; Tyler M Moore; Angel Garcia de La Garza; David R Roalf; Adon F G Rosen; Scott A Lorch; Kosha Ruparel; Russell T Shinohara; Christos Davatzikos; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Xueying Zhang; Emily Spear; Chris Gennings; Paul C Curtin; Allan C Just; Jennifer B Bragg; Annemarie Stroustrup Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Alejandra Barrero-Castillero; Wenyang Mao; Ann R Stark; David Miedema; DeWayne M Pursley; Heather H Burris Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Julie Hong; Jie Yang; Xiaoyue Zhang; Jared Su; Abhinay Tumati; David Garry; Salvatore Docimo; Andrew T Bates; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.584