| Literature DB >> 28152071 |
Anna Ptaszek1, Paweł Ptaszek1, Marek Dziubiński2, N Mirosław Grzesik3, Marta Liszka-Skoczylas1.
Abstract
This research study analysed the rheological properties of potato amylose and potato amylopectin in binary solutions of the following water and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations: 90% DMSO (1), 80% DMSO (2) and 50% DMSO (3), with preparation methodology involving the dissolution at the temperature of 98°C. The studies of dynamic light scattering on the biopolymer coils and the determination of main relaxation times of the solutions were carried out. For the amylose solutions, the fast relaxation phenomena are predominant. The results of the quality tests of the hysteresis loop showed, that the amylose solutions in the solvents (1) and (2) are rheologically stable and shear-thickened. The amylose solutions in solvents (3) reveal oscillatory alterations of viscosity in the time. Amylopectin solutions are characterized by 80% share of slow relaxation phenomena, very low diffusion coefficients and hydrodynamic radii in the range of 2000 nm. The amylopectin solutions are rheologically unstable.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28152071 PMCID: PMC5289532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Apparent viscosity dependence on a) shear rate for 1% (w/w) amylopectin solutions in binary solvents (open symbols represent “up” flow curve, filled “down” flow curve) and b) time of shearing at selected shear rates for 5% (w/w) amylopectin solution in solvent (3). Results shown for binary solvents H2O/DMSO: (1) 100/900, (3) 500/500 and (4) 700/300.
The values of the parameters of the model (2a) for 1% AP solutions and of the model (2b) for 1% AM solutions (sample volume 0.4∙10−6 m3).
| Starch | Up | down | ΔE,J·106 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herschel-Bulkley | time constants ( | Herschel-Bulkley | time constants ( | |||||||||
| K | n | t1, s | t2, s | t3, s | k | n | t1, s | t2, s | t3, s | |||
| AM | II(1) | 1.93·10−5 | 1.08 | 0.1 | 5·10−4 | - | 1.93·10−5 | 1.08 | 0.1 | 5·10−4 | - | - |
| II(2) | 2.07·10−5 | 1.10 | 10 | 10−3 | - | 2.07·10−5 | 1.10 | 10 | 10−3 | - | - | |
| II(3) | 1.05·10−5 | 1.25 | 10−5 | - | - | 1.05·10−5 | 1.25 | 10−5 | - | - | - | |
| AP | II(1) | 0.066 | 0.77 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.005 | 0.065 | 0.77 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 5·10−4 | -2.68 |
| II(3) | 0.031 | 0.84 | 0.7 | - | - | 0.046 | 0.79 | 0.7 | - | - | -2.78 | |
| II(4) | 0.013 | 0.87 | 0.7 | - | - | 0.034 | 0.71 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.002 | -1.40 | |
| III(4) | 0.011 | 0.87 | 0.7 | - | - | 0.011 | 0.89 | 0.1 | 0.007 | - | -1.19 | |
Fig 2a) Apparent viscosity dependence on shear rate for 1% (w/w) amylose solutions in binary solvents (open symbols represent “up” flow curve, filled “down” flow curve). Results shown for solutions in binary solvents H2O/DMSO: (1) 100/900 and (2) 200/800, b)Amplitudes of viscosity in time series as a function of shear rates (left) and possible courses of flow curves (Figenbaum-like diagram, right). Results shown for 1% (w/w) amylose solution in solvent (3) H2O/DMSO: 500/500.
Molecular parameters of starches in binary solutions H2O/DMSO at 25°C.
| starch | Solution | Mw, | A2, | Rg, | Rh, | [η], | α2 | ρ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2O/DMSO | kg·mol-1 | mol∙mL∙g-2 | nm | nm | mL·g-1 | - | - | |||
| AM | potato | 100/900 → (1) | 765±224 | (272±77)×10−6 | 37.5±2.0 | - | 157±0.8 | 2.192 | - | [ |
| 200/800 → (2) | 660±67 | (276±25)×10−6 | 38.8±2.0 | - | 143±0.7 | 1.952 | - | |||
| 500/500 → (3) | 555±44 | (123±9)×10−6 | 34.0±1.8 | - | 83.4±0.4 | 1.304 | - | |||
| 700/300 → (4) | 506±38 | (55.6±36)×10−6 | 26.3±1.4 | - | 65.7±0.3 | 1.189 | - | |||
| maize | 0/1000 | - | - | - | - | 120 | - | - | [ | |
| 340/660 | - | - | - | - | 60 | - | - | |||
| 500/500 | - | - | - | - | 40 | - | - | |||
| 670/330 | - | - | - | - | 25 | - | - | |||
| 100/900 → (1) | 151±1.5 | - | 84±0.3 | - | - | - | - | [ | ||
| AP | maize | 100/900 → (1) | (171±1.4)×103 | - | 238±0.3 | - | - | - | - | [ |
| 100/900 → (1) | 150×103 | 5.5·10−8 | 238 | 190 | - | - | - | [ | ||
| 100/900 → (1) | (15.3±1.4)×103 | - | 99.8±5.5 | 107.0±5.9 | - | 0.91±0.11 | [ | |||
| 300/700 | (57.5±10.3)×103 | - | 182.3±25.8 | 173.5±8.6 | - | 1.06±0.19 | ||||
| 500/500 → (3) | (192.7±14.1) ×103 | - | 182.8±10.9 | 201.2±19.0 | - | 0.93±0.06 | ||||
| 100/900 → (1) | - | - | - | - | 80–220 | - | - | [ | ||
| potato | 0/1000 | - | - | - | - | 178±1 | - | - | [ | |
| 100/900 → (1) | 38±2 | this work | ||||||||
| 200/800 → (2) | 92±2 | |||||||||
| 500/500 → (3) | 117±5 | |||||||||
| 700/300→ (4) | 102±9 | |||||||||
Parameters of Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts equation estimated for 1% solutions of amylose and amylopectin in binary solvents.
| τf, μs | τs, μs | A | Df, cm2·s-1 | Rh, nm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM | II (1) | 0.2 | 3600 | 0.6 | 8.8·10−11 | 780 |
| II (2) | 0.1 | 3700 | 0.6 | 2.1·10−10 | 290 | |
| II (3) | 0.2 | 3700 | 0.5 | 7.3·10−11 | 760 | |
| AP | II (1) | 500 | 3300 | 0.2 | 3.4·10−14 | 2050 |
| II (3) | 200 | 2400 | 0.2 | 8.1·10−14 | 1750 | |
| II (4) | 700 | 2700 | 0.2 | 2.5·10−14 | 2240 |
Fig 3Characteristic times distributions for shear-thickened solutions of amylose and rheounstable shear-thinned amylopectin solutions (distributions for up- and down-flow curve).