| Literature DB >> 28151958 |
Lara Ferreira Paraiso1, Ana Flávia Mayrink Gonçalves-E-Oliveira1, Lucas Moreira Cunha1, Omar Pereira de Almeida Neto2, Adriana Garcia Pacheco1, Karinne Beatriz Gonçalves Araújo1, Mário da Silva Garrote-Filho1, Morun Bernardino Neto3, Nilson Penha-Silva1.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of acute and chronic exercise on erythrocyte membrane stability and various blood indices in a population consisting of five national-level male swimmers, over 18 weeks of training. The evaluations were made at the beginning and end of the 1st, 7th, 13th and 18th weeks, when volume and training intensity have changed. The effects manifested at the beginning of those weeks were considered due to chronic adaptations, while the effects observed at the end of the weeks were considered due to acute manifestations of the exercise load of that week. Acute changes resulting from the exercise comprised increases in creatine kinase activity (CK) and leukocyte count (Leu), and decrease in hematocrit (Ht) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV), at the end of the first week; increase in the activities of CK and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in the uric acid (UA) concentration and Leu count, at the end of the seventh week; increases in CK and LDH activities and in the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), at the end of the 13th week; and decrease in the value of the osmotic stability index 1/H50 and increases in the CK activity and platelets (Plt) count, at the end of the 18th week. Chronic changes due to training comprised increase in the values of 1/H50, CK, LDH, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), serum iron (Fe), MCV and Plt. Although acute training has resulted in decrease in the osmotic stability of erythrocytes, possibly associated with exacerbation of the oxidative processes during intense exercise, chronic training over 18 weeks resulted in increased osmotic stability of erythrocytes, possibly by modulation in the membrane cholesterol content by low and high density lipoproteins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28151958 PMCID: PMC5289559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characterization of training sessions.
| Week | Volume (km/week) | Intensity (MIC) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 50–70% |
| 7 | 50 | 72–82% |
| 13 | 40 | 85–90% |
| 18 | 30 | 88–100% |
* The volume was represented by the distance in kilometers that the athlete swam weekly
**MIC: Maximum Individual Capacity. The intensity was related to the swimming time in relation to individual values obtained in previous competitions for each athlete. The closer each athlete was in relation to his maximum swimming time, the greater the intensity of his training.
Fig 1Typical curve of erythrocytes lysis curve by decrease in the NaCl concentration.
Data were adjusted by sigmoidal regression. H50 is the salt concentration needed to promote 50% hemolysis and 4dX is the variation in salt concentration needed to promote 100% hemolysis associated with the transition from the minimum residual value (Amin) to the maximum value of absorbance (Amax). As dX and H50 have direct and reverse associations with the osmotic stability of erythrocytes, values of 1/H50 and dX were always used in this study in order to deal just with variables directly proportional to osmotic stability.
Fig 2Osmotic fragility curves of red blood cells in the pre-training of the first and 18th weeks of the training program for each of the five volunteers of the study.
Comparison between the values of variables before (pre-training) and after (post-training) each training session.
| Variables | Weeks of regular training | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Number of subjects) | |||||
| 1st | 7th | 13th | 18th | ||
| (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) | ||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||
| Amax (AU) | Pre-training | 0.89 (0.05) | 0.96 (0.07) | 0.90 (0.01) | 0.91 (0.05) |
| Post-training | 0.88 (0.04) | 0.96 (0.13) | 1.01 (0.06) | 0.90 (0.03) | |
| Amin (AU) | Pre-training | 0.00 (0.01) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.02 (0.02) |
| Post-training | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | |
| 1/H50 ((g/dL)-1 NaCl) | Pre-training | 2.17 (0.06) | 2.26 (0.04) | 2.25 (0.03) | 2.44 (0.1) |
| Post-training | 2.19 (0.09) | 2.29 (0.04) | 2.31 (0.03) | 2.25 (0.05) | |
| dX (g/dL NaCl) | Pre-training | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.01) |
| Post-training | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | 0.01 (0.00) | |
| UA (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 4.46 (0.68) | 5.42 (0.87) | 5.04 (0.14) | 5.4 (0.2) |
| Post-training | 4.58 (0.59) | 7.43 (0.83) | 5.36 (0.15) | 5.7 (0.9) | |
| RBC (106/mm3) | Pre-training | 5.34 (0.43) | 5.45 (0.36) | 5.5 (0.28) | 5.42 (0.81) |
| Post-training | 5.19 (0.43) | 5.19 (0.47) | 5.38 (0.13) | 5.03 (0.16) | |
| Hb (g%) | Pre-training | 15.8 (0.4) | 16.1 (0.5) | 15.7 (0.6) | 15.6 (0.6) |
| Post-training | 15.6 (0.7) | 15.3 (0.6) | 15.3 (1.2) | 15.5 (0.2) | |
| Ht (%) | Pre-training | 48.7 (2.3) | 49.7 (2.1) | 49 (1.2) | 48.1 (4.1) |
| Post-training | 47 (1.8) | 47 (3.4) | 46.4 (2.6) | 45.2 (0.4) | |
| MCV (fL) | Pre-training | 91.7 (3.4) | 91.5 (2.5) | 89.1 (3.1) | 90.6 (4.2) |
| Post-training | 91 (1.8) | 91.4 (2.3) | 86.9 (2.5) | 90.3 (2.3) | |
| MCH (pg) | Pre-training | 29.7 (0.7) | 29.8 (0.9) | 28.4 (1.4) | 30.6 (1.4) |
| Post-training | 29.9 (1) | 29.8 (0.8) | 28.7 (1.4) | 31.1 (1.1) | |
| MCHC (g/dL) | Pre-training | 32.4 (0.1) | 32.3 (0.5) | 31.8 (0.4) | 33.2 (0.7) |
| Post-training | 32.9 (0) | 32.3 (0.3) | 32.7 (0.7) | 34.4 (0.7) | |
| RDW (%) | Pre-training | 14.8 (0.2) | 15.5 (1.3) | 12 (1) | 14.6 (0.6) |
| Post-training | 14.6 (0.9) | 15.4 (0.9) | 11 (1) | 15.1 (0.4) | |
| Leu (103/mm3) | Pre-training | 6.4 (1.4) | 5.9 (1.4) | 6 (2.2) | 6 (0.4) |
| Post-training | 8.4 (1.7) | 10.1 (4.4) | 8.8 (2.8) | 8.6 (4.4) | |
| Plt (103/mm3) | Pre-training | 232 (27) | 236 (17) | 252 (41) | 256 (9) |
| Post-training | 247 (31) | 249 (36) | 262 (25) | 288 (25) | |
| Fe (μg/dL) | Pre-training | 58 (0.8) | 89.6 (11.8) | 88.9 (41.3) | 106.5 (32.8) |
| Post-training | 52.6 (9.2) | 76.6 (24.6) | 87.4 (24.9) | 99.7 (35.4) | |
| CK (U/L) | Pre-training | 183 (93) | 183 (108) | 180 (61) | 360 (49) |
| Post-training | 230 (97) | 389 (68) | 301 (104) | 496 (69) | |
| LDH (U/L) | Pre-training | 144 (26) | 180 (15) | 211 (17) | 255 (76) |
| Post-training | 164 (20) | 241 (22) | 201 (29) | 249 (6) | |
| t-C (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 163 (22) | 222 (36) | 190 (56) | 198 (32) |
| Post-training | 143 (28) | 210 (52) | 195 (9) | 203 (26) | |
| TGC (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 127 (71) | 116 (20) | 117 (6) | 107 (49) |
| Post-training | 163 (67) | 100 (14) | 98 (28) | 182 (25) | |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 40.5 (2.4) | 59.5 (11.3) | 60.3 (13.4) | 58.4 (4.2) |
| Post-training | 40 (2.7) | 58.7 (5.1) | 57.5 (16.6) | 58.5 (4.2) | |
| VLDL-C (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 23 (24.4) | 20.6 (3.4) | 23.4 (1.8) | 21.4 (9.8) |
| Post-training | 28 (13.6) | 20.8 (3.8) | 19.6 (5.6) | 36.4 (5) | |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | Pre-training | 76.7 (12.3) | 142.7 (43.4) | 102 (38.1) | 119.6 (6.5) |
| Post-training | 82.1 (33.7) | 137.1 (38.1) | 101.5 (30.6) | 104.5 (29.9) | |
ap<0.063 indicates a statistically significant difference in relation to pre-training of the first collect;
bp<0.063 indicates a statistically significant difference in relation to pre-training of the second collect;
cp<0.063 indicates a statistically significant difference in relation to pre-training of the third collect;
dp<0.063 indicates a statistically significant difference in relation to pre-training of the fourth collect.