Literature DB >> 28151778

Undercorrection of planovalgus deformity after calcaneal lengthening in patients with cerebral palsy.

Byung Chae Cho1, In Hyeok Lee2, Chin Youb Chung1, Ki Hyuk Sung1, Kyoung Min Lee1, Soon-Sun Kwon3, Seung Jun Moon1, Jaeyoung Kim1, Hyunwoo Lim1, Moon Seok Park1.   

Abstract

Calcaneal lengthening (CL) is one of the treatment options for planovalgus deformity in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). However, its indication still needs to be clarified according to the functional status of CP. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiographic outcome after CL in patients with CP and to evaluate the risk factors causing undercorrection of planovalgus deformities. We included consecutive patients with CP who underwent CL for planovalgus deformity, were followed for more than 2 years, and had preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral foot radiographs. Six radiographic indices were used to assess the radiographic outcome. The patient age, sex, and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level were evaluated as possible risk factors, and we controlled for the interaction of potentially confounding variables using multivariate analysis. A total of 44 (77 feet) patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 10.5±4.0 years and the mean follow-up was 5.1±2.2 years. Patients with GMFCS III/IV achieved less correction than those with GMFCS I/II in the AP talus-first metatarsal angle (P=0.001), lateral talocalcaneal angle (P=0.028), and the lateral talus-first metatarsal angle (P<0.001). The rate of undercorrection in the GMFCS III/IV group was 1.6 times higher than that in the GMFCS I/II group in the AP talus-first metatarsal angle (odds ratios: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.0; P<0.001) and 1.6 times higher in the lateral talus-first metatarsal angle (odds ratios: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-1.9; P<0.001). In GMFCS I/II patients with CP, we found CL to be an effective procedure for the correction of planovalgus foot deformities. However, in GMFCS III/IV patients with planovalgus deformities, CL appears to be insufficient on the basis of the high rate of undercorrection in these patients. For patients with GMFCS level III/IV, additional or alternative procedures should be considered to correct the deformity and maintain the correction achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28151778     DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  3 in total

1.  Relationship between Subtalar Joint Stiffness and Relaxed Calcaneal Stance Position in Cerebral Palsy Children with Valgus Deformities.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jie Yao; Yang Yang; Xiaoyu Liu; Lizhen Wang; Fang Pu; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Progression of planovalgus deformity in patients with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Jae Jung Min; Soon-Sun Kwon; Ki Hyuk Sung; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Surgical management of pes planus in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Poppy MacInnes; Thomas L Lewis; Cora Griffin; Michela Martinuzzi; Karen L Shepherd; Michail Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 1.917

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.