Literature DB >> 28150072

Surveillance of protocol deviations in Japanese oncology registration trials: a single institute experience.

Shinsuke Sasada1, Nobuko Ushirozawa2, Noriko Kobayashi2, Yutaka Fujiwara3, Kenji Tamura1,3, Noboru Yamamoto4,5.   

Abstract

Background The contents and requirements of study protocols vary depending upon each clinical registration trial. This study aims to describe details of protocol deviations in Japanese oncology registration trials. Methods We reviewed deviation reports that were discussed by the Institutional Review Board between 2010 and 2015. Results A total of 499 clinical trials were performed, from which 967 deviations were reported. In the initial 3 years, 445 deviations occurred in 535 ongoing trials, while 522 deviations occurred in 876 trials in the subsequent 3 years. The frequency of deviations related to visit, examination, treatment, and others was 189 (19.5%), 446 (46.1%), 275 (28.4%), and 57 (5.9%), respectively. Serious deviations were common at the time of registration of trials and during treatment. The deviations were attributable to the institution (n = 520), subject (n = 93), sponsor (n = 28), schedule management (n = 162), disease condition (n = 95), and others (n = 69). Conclusion This study showed the number and detail responsible factors of protocol deviations. Our findings support to distinguish between the measures to reduce the serious deviations and to reduce the overall number of deviations.

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Deficiency; Oncology; Protocol deviation; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28150072     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-017-0434-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  10 in total

1.  The quality of conduct in Japanese clinical trials: deficiencies found in GCP inspections.

Authors:  Shunsuke Ono; Yasuo Kodama; Taku Nagao; Satoshi Toyoshima
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-02

2.  Recent changes in quality in Japanese clinical trials.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Saito; Yasuo Kodama; Shunsuke Ono; Akio Fujimura
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Compliance with Good Clinical Practice in oncology registration trials in Japan.

Authors:  K Yonemori; A Hirakawa; M Ando; T Hirata; C Shimizu; N Katsumata; K Tamura; Y Fujiwara
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Current status of quality in Japanese clinical trials.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Saito; Yasuo Kodama; Shunsuke Ono; Mizue Mutoh; Susumu Kawashima; Akio Fujimura
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Quality of Japanese clinical trials estimated from good clinical practice audit findings.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Saito; Yasuo Kodama; Shunsuke Ono; Mizue Mutoh; Susumu Kawashima; Akio Fujimura
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  [In order to perform clinical trials efficiently in Japan--important issues in medical institutions raised by the GCP on-site review].

Authors:  Teppei Akiyama; Mitsuko Furuta; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2006-08

Review 7.  [In order to perform clinical trials efficiently in Japan--important issues regarding monitoring by sponsors].

Authors:  Satsuki Kaichi; Toshihiko Oda; Koji Goto; Kei Sato
Journal:  Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2007-11

8.  Reliability of Japanese clinical trials estimated from GCP audit findings.

Authors:  K Saito; Y Kodama; S Ono; C Maida; A Fujimura; E Miyamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.366

9.  Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics.

Authors:  Y Kanda
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Protocol deviation and violation.

Authors:  Arun Bhatt
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2012-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.