| Literature DB >> 28149176 |
Abstract
Coal mine spoils (-the previous overburden of coal seams, inevitable by-product in the mining process) which are usually unfavorable for plant growth have different properties according to dumping years. The reclamation of overburden dumps (OBDs) through plantation by using efficient microbes with suitable bio-inoculants is an environmental friendly microbial technique for significant improvement in fertility status and biological activities of the OBD soil. A systematic greenhouse pot experiment program followed by field trial was conducted to investigate the influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and NFB on the performance of plant growth which have resulted in the development of environmental friendly bio-inoculant package for soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation.Entities:
Keywords: Coalmine; OBD; Reclamation; VAM
Year: 2015 PMID: 28149176 PMCID: PMC5272925 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Taxon growing on different age group OBDs in the Core zone. [+ (presence), − (absence), H (Herbs), S (Shrub), T (Tree)].
| Taxon | Family | Habit | Zone | Age of OBD (in years) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periphery | Core | ||||||
| 5 | 10 | 15 | |||||
| Mimosaceae | T | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Mimosaceae | S | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Mimosaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Mimosaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Rutaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Apocynaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Amaranthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Rutaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Amaranthaceae | H | + | + | + | + | − | |
| Amaranthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Amaranthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Annonaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Annonaceae | S | + | − | ||||
| Paparveraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Melliaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Caesalpiniaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Nyctaginaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Bombacaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Arecaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Fabaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Asclepiadaceae | S | + | − | ||||
| Caesalpiniaceae | S | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Caesalpiniaceae | S | + | + | − | + | + | |
| Asclepiadaceae | S | + | + | − | + | + | |
| Caesalpiniaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Caesalpiniaceae | S | + | − | ||||
| Caesalpiniaceae | S | + | − | ||||
| Convolvulaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Zingiberaceae | S | + | − | ||||
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Fabaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | + | − | ||||
| Cyperaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Papilonaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Oxalidaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Leguminaneae | T | + | − | ||||
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Convolvulaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Acanthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Fabaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Fabaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Convolvulaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Acanthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Verbenaceae | S | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Labiatae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Labiatae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Sapotaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Anacardiaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Melliaceae | T | + | + | − | + | + | |
| Scrophulariaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Verbenaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Minosaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Verbenaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Arecaceae | T | + | + | − | + | + | |
| Fabaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Acanthaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Scrophulariaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Cyperaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Anacardiaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Malvaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Dipterocarpaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Celastraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Solanaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Poaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Sterculiaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Moraceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Taccaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Fabaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Taccaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Combretaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Combretaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Fabaceae | T | + | − | ||||
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Euphorbiaceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Verbenaceae | S | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | − | + | + | |
| Asteraceae | H | − | + | + | + | + | |
| Rhamnaceae | T | + | − | ||||
Density of plant species found on the core zone of mine area.
| Taxon | Density of plant community on OBDs | Frequency (%) of plant community on OBDs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 years | 10 years | 15 years | 5 years | 10 years | 15 years | |
| 00 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 00 | 20 | 25 | |
| 00 | 2.1 | 5.3 | 00 | 30 | 40 | |
| 00 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 00 | 35 | 56 | |
| 1.9 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 25 | 38 | 47 | |
| 2.6 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 28 | 39 | 49 | |
| 1.8 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 20 | 50 | 58 | |
| 1.4 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 25 | 55 | 70 | |
| 00 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 00 | 27 | 51 | |
| 3.6 | 6.4 | 9.2 | 60 | 80 | 90 | |
| 1.3 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 30 | 35 | 69 | |
Figure 1Dominant plant families in core zone.
Spore population, root colonization and nodulation in raised plants (90 DAP) in poly bags under green house (Significant marked with bold).
| Taxon | Spore population per 5 g of dry soil | Percent root colonization | Nodule per plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 DAP | 15 years old OBD | 90 DAP | 15 years old OBD | 90 DAP | 15 years old OBD | |
| 06 | 16 | 28 | 48 | 13 | 24 | |
| 08 | 18 | 17 | 27 | 30 | 33 | |
| 07 | 27 | 23 | 33 | 38 | 54 | |
| 09 | 29 | 35 | 43 | 48 | 57 | |
| 07 | 37 | 27 | 47 | 56 | 78 | |
| 02 | 22 | 11 | 21 | 43 | 43 | |
| 03 | 13 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 37 | |
| 05 | 15 | 12 | 18 | 13 | 34 | |
Figure 2Mortality rate on field condition.
Nodulation, spore population and percent root colonization at 6, 9 and 12 months in two representative plant species (Significant marked with bold).
| Taxon | Treatment | Average nodulation | Average spore population/5 gm dry OBD soil | Percent root colonization | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period (in month) | Period (in month) | Period (in month) | ||||||||
| 6 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 12 | ||
| T1 | 00 | 6.5 | 13.4 | 19.4 | 25.4 | 28.5 | 10 | 13 | 15 | |
| T2 | 17.6 | 28.3 | 30.3 | 27.6 | 37.6 | 44.6 | 14 | 16 | 19 | |
| T3 | 18.7 | 33.5 | 38.6 | 26.3 | 36.3 | 56.6 | 34 | 36 | 37 | |
| T4 | 19.3 | 53.5 | 56.7 | 24.4 | 46.4 | 57.4 | 43 | 54 | 65 | |
| T5 | 21.3 | 48.9 | 63.3 | 28.2 | 48.2 | 65.4 | 35 | 36 | 39 | |
| T7 | 33.1 | 76.5 | 124 | 38.9 | 48.9 | 65.7 | 46 | 48 | 52 | |
| T8 | 36.4 | 67.7 | 98.6 | 38.4 | 48.8 | 61.3 | 34 | 48 | 51 | |
| T9 | 31.1 | 48.3 | 87.5 | 34.8 | 44.8 | 64.6 | 36 | 38 | 41 | |
| T1 | 12 | 14 | 28 | 16.4 | 35.4 | 38.5 | 20 | 33 | 35 | |
| T2 | 15 | 17 | 29 | 28.6 | 37.6 | 44.6 | 44 | 46 | 59 | |
| T3 | 17 | 19 | 28 | 28.3 | 36.3 | 56.6 | 48 | 56 | 57 | |
| T4 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 25.4 | 46.4 | 57.4 | 59 | 54 | 65 | |
| T5 | 19 | 20 | 25 | 26.2 | 48.2 | 65.4 | 43 | 36 | 69 | |
| T7 | 24 | 29 | 34 | 35.9 | 48.9 | 65.7 | 66 | 48 | 72 | |
| T8 | 22 | 27 | 35 | 37.4 | 48.8 | 61.3 | 55 | 48 | 71 | |
| T9 | 25 | 27 | 34 | 37.8 | 44.8 | 64.6 | 66 | 38 | 71 | |