| Literature DB >> 28148998 |
Line Johansen1, Sølvi Wehn1, Knut Anders Hovstad1.
Abstract
Grazing is an important management action to conserve biodiversity in semi-natural grasslands but it is important to understand how grazing influences the life-history components and population dynamics of plant species. In this study, we analysed effects of grazing intensity and abandonment on population dynamics of the semi-natural grassland species Knautia arvensis which is an important nectar source for pollinating species and an indicator of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We recorded life-history stage, survival, establishment of seedlings and ramets, number of inflorescences and grazing marks on permanently marked individuals in eight populations in mid-Norway for three consecutive years. Matrix modelling was used to estimate population growth rates and elasticities, and life Table response experiments (LTREs) were used to assess the contribution of different life-history components to the observed variation in population growth rates between different management treatments. Generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) were used to investigate the effect of management on vital rates and number of inflorescences as well as damage to K. arvensis individuals. Populations in abandoned grasslands had more inflorescences, a lower proportion of seedlings and a higher proportion of flowering ramets compared to populations in grasslands under high grazing intensity. There were no differences in population growth rates between different grazing intensities. Fecundity however, contributed more to the growth rate in grazed grasslands compared to abandoned grasslands where clonal regeneration contributed the most. Survival of non-flowering rosettes made the largest impact to overall growth rates. Our results indicate that a long life-span and clonal growth buffer the effect of environmental change in abandoned grasslands and that there is a trade-off between fertility and clonal regeneration in K. arvensis populations.Entities:
Keywords: Growth rate; Knautia arvensis; LTRE analysis; Life-history components; Matrix projection models; Stage structure
Year: 2016 PMID: 28148998 PMCID: PMC5268356 DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Flora ISSN: 0367-2530 Impact factor: 2.088
Transition matrix model for Knautia arvensis with five stage classes: seedlings, non-flowering clonal offspring, flowering clonal offspring, non-flowering rosette and flowering rosette. Transitions are grouped according to seven life-history components: clonal reproduction (CR), fecundity (F), survival of clonal offspring (SC), seedling survival (SS), stasis (S), retrogression (R) and entering flowering stage (EF). “0” indicates that there are no transitions between the stage classes. Subscript numbers by the matrix elements indicate the transitions from stage j to i in one-year intervals (t + 1).
| year t | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seedlings | Non-flowering clonal offspring | Flowering clonal offspring | Non-flowering rosette | Flowering rosette | ||
| year t + 1 | Seedlings | 0 | 0 | F13 | 0 | F15 |
| Non-flowering clonal offspring | 0 | CR22 | CR23 | CR24 | CR25 | |
| Flowering clonal offspring | 0 | CR32 | CR33 | CR34 | CR35 | |
| Non-flowering rosette | SS41 | SC42 | SC43 | S44 | R45 | |
| Flowering rosette | SS51 | SC52 | SC53 | EF54 | S55 | |
Estimated fixed effects statistics for linear mixed models with responses: survival to the next year (t + 1) (survivals), proportion of seedlings (seedlings), proportion of flowering ramets (flowering ramets, number of inflorescences per flowering ramet (inflorescences), proportion of clonal reproduction (clonal reproduction), and proportion of grazed ramets (grazed ramets). The explanatory variables studied were: year (2008, 2009, 2010), grazing intensity (no, low, high) and interactions between years and grazing intensities. Models were fitted with backward selection and bold test statistics indicate p < 0.05.
| Survivals | Seedlings | Flowering ramets | Inflorescences | Clonal reproduction | Grazed ramets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory variable | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | z | Estimate | z | Estimate | z | |||
| Intercept | 1.819 | −6.387 | −5.559 | −0.605 | −1.480 | −0.129 | 0.142 | 1.396 | 0.262 | 0.419 | ||
| Year 2009 | −0.718 | 1.685 | 1.395 | −0.453 | 0.064 | 1.502 | −1.087 | |||||
| Year 2010 | 1.768 | 1.488 | −0.043 | −0.265 | −0.078 | −1.815 | 0.761 | −0.932 | ||||
| Grazing low | −12.769 | −0.013 | 0.507 | 0.710 | −0.618 | 0.358 | 0.923 | −1.461 | −1.420 | |||
| Grazing high | 4.376 | −2.693 | −0.864 | −0.127 | −0.398 | |||||||
| Year 2009: Grazing low | 11.742 | 0.012 | −1.090 | 0.215 | 2.344 | |||||||
| Year 2009: Grazing high | −4.457 | 0.293 | 0.874 | 0.167 | 1.096 | |||||||
| Year 2010: Grazing low | 12.377 | −1.919 | −1.073 | 0.270 | −0.754 | 1.184 | ||||||
| Year 2010: Grazing high | −2.365 | 0.338 | 1.080 | −0.355 | −1.937 | −1.204 | − | |||||
Year 2010 not included in the model.
Year 2008 not included in the model.
No grazing not included in the model.
Fig. 1Mean and standard error of (a) survival to the next year (t + 1), (b) proportion of seedlings, (c) proportion of flowering ramets, (d) number of inflorescences per ramet, (e) proportion of clonal reproduction, and (f) proportion of grazed ramets in Knautia arvensis populations in 2008, 2009 and 2010 in semi-natural grasslands with no (abandoned), low and high grazing intensity.
Fig. 3Life-cycle of Knautia arvensis covering five stages. The arrows represent yearly transitions and elasticity values of the overall mean matrix are given.
Fig. 2Projected population growth rates for Knautia arvensis populations (1–8) in semi-natural grasslands with no (abandoned), low and high grazing intensity in two transition years (2008–2009 and 2009–2010). The error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4Overall grazing intensity effect (no, low, high) to variation in the population growth rate (λ) from a life Table response experiments (LTRE) variance decomposition analysis. The error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 5Grazing intensity effect (no, low, high) to variation in the population growth rate (λ) from a life Table response experiments (LTRE) variance decomposition analysis. Transitions in the matrix are grouped according to life-history components: seedling survival (SS), survival of clonal offspring (SC), stasis (S), entering flowering stage (EF), retrogression (R), clonal reproduction (CR) and fecundity (F). Retrogression is defined as the transition from flowering to non-flowering stage.