Literature DB >> 28148826

Prognostic Relevance of Tumor Purity and Interaction with MGMT Methylation in Glioblastoma.

Eva Schulze Heuling1, Felix Knab1, Josefine Radke2,3,4, Eskil Eskilsson5, Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma5, Arend Koch2, Marcus Czabanka6, Christoph Dieterich7, Roel G Verhaak5,8, Christoph Harms9,4,10, Philipp Euskirchen9,4,11.   

Abstract

Promoter methylation status of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), a DNA repair enzyme, is a critical biomarker in glioblastoma (GBM), as treatment decisions and clinical trial inclusion rely on its accurate assessment. However, interpretation of results is complicated by poor interassay reproducibility as well as a weak correlation between methylation status and expression levels of MGMT. This study systematically investigates the influence of tumor purity on tissue subjected to MGMT analysis. A quantitative, allele-specific real-time PCR (qAS-PCR) assay was developed to determine genotype and mutant allele frequency of telomerase promoter (pTERT) mutations as a direct measure of tumor purity. We studied tumor purity, pTERT mutation by Sanger sequencing, MGMT methylation by pyrosequencing, IDH1 mutation status, and clinical parameters in a cohort of high-grade gliomas (n = 97). The qAS-PCR reliably predicted pTERT genotype and tumor purity compared with independent methods. Tumor purity positively and significantly correlated with the extent of methylation in MGMT methylated GBMs. Extent of MGMT methylation differed significantly with respect to pTERT mutation hotspot (C228T vs. C250T). Interestingly, frontal lobe tumors showed greater tumor purity than those in other locations. Above all, tumor purity was identified as an independent prognostic factor in GBM. In conclusion, we determined mutual associations of tumor purity with MGMT methylation and pTERT mutations and found that the extent of MGMT methylation reflects tumor purity. In turn, tumor purity is prognostic in IDH1 wild-type GBM.Implications: Tumor purity is an independent prognostic marker in glioblastoma and is associated with the extent of MGMT methylation. Mol Cancer Res; 15(5); 532-40. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148826     DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  11 in total

1.  Clinical and Prognostic Implications of 1p/19q, IDH, BRAF, MGMT Promoter, and TERT Promoter Alterations, and Expression of Ki-67 and p53 in Human Gliomas.

Authors:  Zixi Yang; Feng Ling; Sibei Ruan; Jiajia Hu; Mingxi Tang; Xingwang Sun; Wenbo Long
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Claire Kelly; Francesca Spiga; Ashleigh Kernohan; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Sarah Dawson; Lena Schmidt; Tomos Robinson; Sebastian Brandner; Claire L Faulkner; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Amy Howell; Luke Vale; Julian P T Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  ADAMTSL4, a Secreted Glycoprotein, Is a Novel Immune-Related Biomarker for Primary Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Zheng Zhao; Ke-Nan Zhang; Rui-Chao Chai; Kuan-Yu Wang; Ruo-Yu Huang; Guan-Zhang Li; Yong-Zhi Wang; Jing Chen; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Serum biomarkers identification by iTRAQ and verification by MRM: S100A8/S100A9 levels predict tumor-stroma involvement and prognosis in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anjali Arora; Vikas Patil; Paramita Kundu; Paturu Kondaiah; A S Hegde; A Arivazhagan; Vani Santosh; Debnath Pal; Kumaravel Somasundaram
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Integrating Genomic Data with Transcriptomic Data for Improved Survival Prediction for Adult Diffuse Glioma.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Yi Xiong; Nian Jiang; Fanyuan Zeng; Chunhai Huang; Xuejun Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Multi-dimensional omics characterization in glioblastoma identifies the purity-associated pattern and prognostic gene signatures.

Authors:  Yi Xiong; Zujian Xiong; Hang Cao; Chang Li; Siyi Wanggou; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.722

7.  Screening the key genes of prognostic value in the microenvironment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Di Meng; Tongjun Liu; Feng Ma; Mingguo Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Identifying the optimal cutoff point for MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ngan Nguyen; Jordan Redfield; Matthew Ballo; Madison Michael; Jeffrey Sorenson; Daniel Dibaba; Jim Wan; Glenda Delgado Ramos; Manjari Pandey
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2021-09-06

9.  Phenotypic Mapping of Pathologic Cross-Talk between Glioblastoma and Innate Immune Cells by Synthetic Genetic Tracing.

Authors:  Matthias Jürgen Schmitt; Carlos Company; Yuliia Dramaretska; Iros Barozzi; Andreas Göhrig; Sonia Kertalli; Melanie Großmann; Heike Naumann; Maria Pilar Sanchez-Bailon; Danielle Hulsman; Rainer Glass; Massimo Squatrito; Michela Serresi; Gaetano Gargiulo
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  The interaction between TERT promoter mutation and MGMT promoter methylation on overall survival of glioma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huy Gia Vuong; Thu Quynh Nguyen; Tam N M Ngo; Hoang Cong Nguyen; Kar-Ming Fung; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.