Literature DB >> 28148492

Rest interval duration does not influence adaptations in acid/base transport proteins following 10 wk of sprint-interval training in active women.

Cian McGinley1,2, David J Bishop3,4.   

Abstract

The removal of protons (H+) produced during intense exercise is important for skeletal muscle function, yet it remains unclear how best to structure exercise training to improve muscle pH regulation. We investigated whether 4 wk of work-matched sprint-interval trining (SIT), performed 3 days/wk, with either 1 (Rest-1; n = 7) or 5 (Rest-5; n = 7) min of rest between sprints, influenced adaptations in acid/base transport protein content, nonbicarbonate muscle buffer capacity (βmin vitro), and exercise capacity in active women. Following 1 wk of posttesting, comprising a biopsy, a repeated-sprint ability (RSA) test, and a graded-exercise test, maintenance of adaptations was then studied by reducing SIT volume to 1 day/wk for a further 5 wk. After 4 wk of SIT, there was increased protein abundance of monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)-1, sodium/hydrogen exchanger (NHE)-1, and carbonic anhydrase (CA) XIV for both groups, but rest interval duration did not influence the adaptive response. In contrast, greater improvements in total work performed during the RSA test after 4 wk of SIT were evident for Rest-5 compared with Rest-1 (effect size: 0.51; 90% confidence limits ±0.37), whereas both groups had similarly modest improvements in V̇o2peak When training volume was reduced to 1 day/wk, enhanced acid/base transport protein abundance was maintained, although NHE1 content increased further for Rest-5 only. Finally, our data support intracellular lactate as a signaling molecule for inducing MCT1 expression, but neither lactate nor H+ accumulation appears to be important signaling factors in MCT4 regulation.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detraining; intracellular buffering; lactate transport; repeated-sprint ability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148492     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00459.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  3 in total

Review 1.  High Intensity Interval Training: A Potential Method for Treating Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Qian-Qi Liu; Wen-Qing Xie; Yu-Xuan Luo; Yi-Dan Li; Wei-Hong Huang; Yu-Xiang Wu; Yu-Sheng Li
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 2.  Time to Optimize Supplementation: Modifying Factors Influencing the Individual Responses to Extracellular Buffering Agents.

Authors:  André B Heibel; Pedro H L Perim; Luana F Oliveira; Lars R McNaughton; Bryan Saunders
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-05-08

3.  Sex Differences in High-Intensity Interval Training-Are HIIT Protocols Interchangeable Between Females and Males?

Authors:  Boris Schmitz; Hannah Niehues; Lothar Thorwesten; Andreas Klose; Michael Krüger; Stefan-Martin Brand
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.