Literature DB >> 28148466

X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for abdominal digital radiography: Evaluation using signal difference-to-noise ratio.

Hiroki Kawashima1, Katsuhiro Ichikawa2, Daisuke Nagasou3, Masayuki Hattori3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filters (Cu-filters) for abdominal general radiography was indicated in a report using a simulation study. We validated the dose reduction effects using a clinical digital radiography system equipped with an indirect-type CsI detector and an automatic Cu-filter insertion function.
METHODS: The image qualities were evaluated using signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) for different radiation qualities with and without Cu-filters for a 20-cm acrylic phantom. Acrylic and bone equivalent material plates were used for contrast measurements. The dose reduction using Cu-filters was estimated from the ratios of the SDNR2 values.
RESULTS: For the same entrance surface dose (ESD), Cu-filters with 0.1- and 0.2-mm thicknesses increased the image quality as evaluated by SDNR2 and the estimated dose reduction without degrading the image quality. For the acrylic contrast, the dose reductions with the 0.1- and 0.2-mm-thick Cu-filters were approximately 30% and 44% at 70kV and 29% and 35% at 80kV, respectively. For the bone contrast, the reduction rates were slightly reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: We validated the dose reduction capability of additional Cu-filters without degrading the image quality for abdominal radiography. The estimated entrance surface dose reductions of the Cu-filters were approximately 30-40% and 20-30% for the acrylic and bone contrasts, respectively, and effective dose reductions for acrylic were nearly half of those for ESD. At these reduced dose conditions, the current time product values needed to be increased by factors of 1.4 and 1.8 for the 0.1- and 0.2-mm-thick Cu-filters, respectively.
Copyright © 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal radiography; Cu-filter; Dose reduction; Signal difference-to-noise ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148466     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  Usefulness of an Additional Filter Created Using 3D Printing for Whole-Body X-ray Imaging with a Long-Length Detector.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Seo; Wooyoung Kim; Bongju Han; Huimin Jang; Myeong Seong Yoon; Youngjin Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Dual-energy computed tomography using a gantry-based preclinical cone-beam microcomputed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Justin J Tse; Joy Dunmore-Buyze; Maria Drangova; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-08-21

3.  Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerhard Kütterer; Pierre J Kicken; Marij J Frantzen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

4.  Effective dose and image optimisation of lateral lumbar spine radiography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Zer Hau Lai; Cláudia Sá Dos Reis; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-13

Review 5.  Recent Development in X-Ray Imaging Technology: Future and Challenges.

Authors:  Xiangyu Ou; Xue Chen; Xianning Xu; Lili Xie; Xiaofeng Chen; Zhongzhu Hong; Hua Bai; Xiaowang Liu; Qiushui Chen; Lin Li; Huanghao Yang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2021-12-26

6.  Abdominal Digital Radiography with a Novel Post-Processing Technique: Phantom and Patient Studies.

Authors:  Hyein Kang; Eun Sun Lee; Hyun Jeong Park; Byung Kwan Park; Jae Yong Park; Suk-Won Suh
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.