| Literature DB >> 28148293 |
Meiying Zhang1,2, Guanglei Zhuang2,3, Xiangjun Sun1,2, Yanying Shen4, Wenjing Wang2, Qing Li2, Wen Di5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic instability caused by mutation of the checkpoint molecule TP53 may endow cancer cells with the ability to undergo genomic evolution to survive stress and treatment. We attempted to gain insight into the potential contribution of ovarian cancer genomic instability resulted from TP53 mutation to the aberrant expression of multidrug resistance gene MDR1.Entities:
Keywords: Epithelial ovarian cancer; Genomic instability; MDR1 copy number; Recurrence; TP53 mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28148293 PMCID: PMC5288946 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-017-0605-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
DNA Sequencing and IHC Results
| Sample |
| Class of Mutation | IHC Results | Proportion of Tumor cells (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R306 (abundance: 61.5%) | II | ++ | 80 |
IHC immunohistochemistry
P53 nuclei staining: -, complete absence of staining; ±, <10% of tumor cells with faint staining intensity; +, 10%-50% of tumor cells with faint staining intensity; ++, ≥50% of tumor cells with moderate staining intensity; +++, ≥50% of tumor cells with strong staining intensity
Fig. 1Immunohistochemistry results for 4 ovarian cancer samples harboring TP53 mutations. a: the patient with a TP53 nonsense mutation exhibited negative P53 staining; b: the patient with a low abundance (5.7%) of TP53 frameshift mutation exhibited faint P53 staining; c: the patient with a TP53 frameshift mutation exhibited moderate P53 staining; d: the patient with a TP53 missense mutation exhibited strong P53 staining. (×400)
Clinicopathological Characteristics and TP53 Mutational Analysis
| Characteristics | Number of total patients | (%) | Pc | Number of | (%) | Pd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parity | 0.019* | 0.042* | ||||
| 0-1 | 77 | 47.8 | 59 | 48.0 | ||
| 2-3 | 66 | 41.0 | 57 | 46.3 | ||
| >3 | 15 | 9.3 | 7 | 5.7 | ||
| Peritoneal metastasis | 0.004* | 0.027* | ||||
| yes | 89 | 55.3 | 79 | 64.2 | ||
| no FIGO stage | 71 | 44.1 | 0.025* | 44 | 35.8 | 0.024* |
| I | 55 | 34.2 | 33 | 26.8 | ||
| II | 18 | 11.2 | 17 | 13.8 | ||
| III | 80 | 49.7 | 66 | 53.7 | ||
| IV | 7 | 4.3 | 7 | 5.7 | ||
| Histotype | 0.954 | 0.114 | ||||
| serous | 91 | 56.5 | 70 | 56.9 | ||
| mucinous | 22 | 13.7 | 16 | 13.0 | ||
| endometrioid | 23 | 14.3 | 13 | 10.6 | ||
| clear cell | 16 | 9.9 | 15 | 12.2 | ||
| undifferentiated | 9 | 5.6 | 9 | 7.3 | ||
| WHO grade | 0.415 | 0.068 | ||||
| G1 | 33 | 20.5 | 22 | 17.9 | ||
| G2 | 57 | 35.4 | 39 | 31.7 | ||
| G3 | 69 | 42.9 | 62 | 50.4 | ||
| Tumor gradea | 0.003* | 0.002* | ||||
| low-grade | 57 | 35.4 | 33 | 26.8 | ||
| high-grade | 101 | 62.7 | 90 | 73.2 | ||
| CA125 (Uml–1) b | 0.001* | 0.508 | ||||
| ≤ 206.52 | 86 | 53.4 | 51 | 41.5 | ||
| > 206.52 | 46 | 28.6 | 39 | 31.7 | ||
| Residual tumor (cm) | <0.0001* | 0.102 | ||||
| ≤ 0.5 | 119 | 73.9 | 86 | 69.9 | ||
| > 0.5 | 40 | 24.8 | 37 | 30.1 | ||
| Platinum resistance | <0.0001* | 0.161 | ||||
| yes | 36 | 22.4 | 33 | 26.8 | ||
| no | 123 | 76.4 | 90 | 73.2 |
a: In accordance with morphological and molecular genetic analysis, EOC was divided into two categories [28]
b: Based on patient survival, the cutoff value of CA125 calculated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was 206.52 (Uml–1)
c: p value for clinicopathological characteristics
d: p value for TP53 mutation
*p < 0.05
Fig. 2The relationship between the presence of TP53 mutation and ovarian cancer patient prognosis. a: proportional analysis of complete, partial and no remission after the first round of chemotherapy between the TP53 mutant and wild-type groups; b: Kaplan-Meier analysis of the TP53 mutant and wild-type groups (p < 0.05); c: the ratio of 5-year progression-free survival and subsequent chemoresistance after relapse between the TP53 mutant and wild-type groups. *p < 0.05
Fig. 3Analysis of TP53 mutations and DNA abnormalities. a: HE staining of the TP53 wild-type and mutant ovarian cancer cells to investigate nucleus morphology; b: quantitative analysis of the ovarian cancer cell DNA index in the TP53 wild-type and mutant groups; c: cell cycle analysis of polyploid cell ratios in two groups by flow cytometry
Fig. 4MDR1 and chromosome 7 copy numbers were detected via FISH in two group samples. a: MDR1-FISH revealed MDR1 copy numbers in the two groups, red indicates MDR1, and chromosome 7 centromeres are stained in green; b: the green-staining for chromosome 7 centromeres in the two groups
Fig. 5Changes in MDR1 expression in primary and recurrent lesions between the TP53 wild-type and mutant groups detected by immunohistochemistry. First row: TP53 wild-type group, second row: TP53 mutant group. The first column indicates P53 expression, the second column indicates MDR1 expression in primary lesions, and the third column indicates MDR1 expression in relapse tissues. (×200)