| Literature DB >> 28148273 |
Toshiro Sato1, Mitsuo Kishi2, Miki Suda1, Kiyomi Sakata3, Haruki Shimoda3, Hiroyuki Miura4, Akira Ogawa5, Seiichiro Kobayashi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Candida species are normal commensal organisms of the mouth. However, they can cause oral mucosal and severe systemic infections in persons with reduced immune function, which is common in the very elderly. In post-disaster areas, the number of elderly residents rapidly increases due to the outflow of younger generations. Hence, we examined the prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans in association with oral and systemic conditions, life style, medications, and living conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicans; Elderly; Non-albicans; Post-disaster area
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28148273 PMCID: PMC5288978 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0342-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Fig. 1Sample selection and description of the study population
Detection rates of Candida in elderly community dwellers (n = 266) in a post-disaster area
|
| Number of carriers | % of entire subjects | % of carriers of any |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 142 | 53.4 | 87.7 |
|
| 60 | 22.6 | 37.0 |
|
| 5 | 1.8 | 3.1 |
|
| 2 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Any non- | 63 | 23.7 | 38.9 |
| Any | 162 | 60.9 | - |
Significant factors related to colonization of C. albicans in surveyed parameters in this study (N = 264)
| Parameter |
| COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | Number of positive (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Having one or more decayed teeth | ||||
| Yes | 53 | 3.35 (1.70–6.63) <0.01 | 3.51 (1.60–7.67) <0.01 | 40 (75.5) |
| Noa | 211 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 101 (47.9) |
| Oral hygiene | ||||
| Poor | 34 | 2.42 (1.18–4.99) <0.01 | 2.01 (0.77–5.24) 0.15 | 25 (73.5) |
| Fair/Good | 230 | 1.00 | 116 (50.4) | |
| Relocation from home | ||||
| Yes | 104 | 1.45 (1.06–1.99) 0.02 | 2.17 (1.25–3.78) <0.01 | 65 (62.5) |
| No | 160 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 76 (47.5) |
Parameters include significant factors in either bivariate or multivariate analysis, COR crude odds ratio from bivariate analysis, AOR adjusted odds ratio from multinomial logistic regression analysis; CI confidence interval
aThe reference categories are in the last row for all explanatory variables
Significant factors related to colonization of Non-albicans in surveyed parameters in this study (N = 264)
|
| COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | Number of positive (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | ||||
| ≥ 80 | 44 | 2.21 (1.36–5.34) <0.01 | 2.58 (1.12–5.71) 0.02 | 18 (40.9) |
| < 80a | 220 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 45 (20.5) |
| Number of remaining teeth | ||||
| Edentulous | 73 | 2.39 (1.83–3.12) <0.01 | 5.99 (1.37–26.3) 0.02 | 27 (37.0) |
| 1-19 | 107 | 1.84 (1.51–2.42) <0.01 | 3.37 (0.88–12.9) 0.08 | 32 (29.9) |
| 20 or more | 84 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4 (4.8) |
| Use of dentures | ||||
| Yes | 180 | 1.56 (1.37–1.77) <0.01 | 4.02 (1.05–15.4) 0.04 | 59 (32.8) |
| No | 84 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 4 (4.8) |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | ||||
| Yes | 99 | 1.45 (1.06–2.00) 0.04 | 2.25 (1.15–4.40) 0.02 | 31 (31.3) |
| No | 165 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 32 (19.4) |
Parameters include significant factors in either bivariate or multivariate analysis, COR crude odds ratio from bivariate analysis, AOR adjusted odds ratio from multinomial logistic regression analysis; CI confidence interval
aThe reference categories are in the last row for all explanatory variables
Comparisons of colony amounts of Candida species by demographic characteristics, oral conditions, systemic conditions, lifestyle, medications, and relocation from home in carriers
|
| Non- | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of carriers | Mean log CFU (SD) |
| No. of carriers | Mean log CFU (SD) |
| |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 78 | 1.44 (0.65) | 0.72 | 42 | 1.91 (0.92) | 0.63 |
| Malea | 63 | 1.44 (0.66) | 21 | 1.73 (0.74) | ||
| Age (in years) | ||||||
| ≥ 80 | 29 | 1.59 (0.74) | 0.24 | 18 | 1.87 (0.88) | 0.84 |
| < 80 | 112 | 1.40 (0.63) | 45 | 1.85 (0.86) | ||
| Having one or more decayed teeth | ||||||
| Yes | 40 | 1.45 (0.60) | 0.77 | 13 | 1.56 (0.62) | 0.31 |
| No | 101 | 1.43 (0.68) | 50 | 1.93 (0.90) | ||
| Number of remaining teeth | ||||||
| Edentulous | 33 | 1.88 (0.67) | <0.01b | 27 | 2.17 (0.93) | 0.09 |
| 1-19 | 60 | 1.35 (0.61) | 32 | 1.62 (0.78) | ||
| 20 or more | 48 | 1.25 (0.56) | 4 | 1.55 (0.24) | ||
| Having periodontal pockets | ||||||
| Yes | 41 | 1.32 (0.66) | 0.16 | 14 | 1.69 (0.71) | 0.55 |
| No | 100 | 1.49 (0.65) | 49 | 1.90 (0.60) | ||
| Oral hygiene | ||||||
| Poor | 25 | 1.39 (0.65) | 0.70 | 8 | 1.69 (0.73) | 0.75 |
| Fair/Good | 116 | 1.45 (0.66) | 55 | 1.88 (0.88) | ||
| Use of denture | ||||||
| Yes | 93 | 1.52 (0.68) | 0.07 | 59 | 1.88 (0.88) | 0.49 |
| No | 48 | 1.29 (0.58) | 4 | 1.45 (0.40) | ||
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | ||||||
| Yes | 11 | 1.42 (0.72) | 0.86 | 31 | 1.93 (0.89) | 0.50 |
| No | 130 | 1.44 (0.65) | 32 | 1.78 (0.84) | ||
| Hypertension (systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥90) | ||||||
| Yes | 38 | 1.61 (0.63) | 0.04 | 24 | 1.84 (0.77) | 0.96 |
| No | 103 | 1.37 (0.65) | 39 | 1.86 (0.92) | ||
| Dyslipidemia (HDLC ≤ 34 or LDLC ≥140) | ||||||
| Yes | 37 | 1.31 (0.57) | 0.20 | 14 | 1.90 (0.92) | 0.99 |
| No | 104 | 1.48 (0.68) | 49 | 1.84 (0.85) | ||
| Hyperglycemia (HbA1c ≥5.6) | ||||||
| Yes | 31 | 1.58 (0.67) | 0.14 | 17 | 2.07 (0.71) | 0.50 |
| No | 110 | 1.40 (0.65) | 46 | 1.77 (0.90) | ||
| Current smoker | ||||||
| Yes | 11 | 1.42 (0.72) | 0.86 | 5 | 1.63 (0.88) | 0.58 |
| No | 130 | 1.44 (0.65) | 58 | 1.87 (0.86) | ||
| Daily drinker | ||||||
| Yes | 19 | 1.72 (0.67) | 0.40 | 7 | 1.81 (1.26) | 0.54 |
| No | 122 | 1.39 (0.64) | 56 | 1.86 (0.81) | ||
| Taking antihypertensive drugs | ||||||
| Yes | 83 | 1.48 (0.65) | 0.30 | 38 | 1.98 (0.83) | 0.09 |
| No | 58 | 1.37 (0.66) | 25 | 1.65 (0.88) | ||
| Taking diabetes drugs | ||||||
| Yes | 8 | 1.45 (0.60) | 0.80 | 5 | 2.11 (0.82) | 0.41 |
| No | 133 | 1.43 (0.66) | 58 | 1.83 (0.87) | ||
| Taking hypnotics | ||||||
| Yes | 25 | 1.49 (0.76) | 0.81 | 12 | 2.15 (0.79) | 0.14 |
| No | 116 | 1.42 (0.63) | 51 | 1.78 (0.87) | ||
| Relocation from home | ||||||
| Yes | 65 | 1.40 (0.65) | 0.50 | 25 | 1.82 (0.84) | 0.72 |
| No | 76 | 1.47 (0.66) | 38 | 1.88 (0.89) | ||
aStatistical differences were examined by Mann-Whitney U test for bivariate combinations, and Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of 3 groups
bPost-hoc multiple comparisons using Bonferroni adjustment indicated that there was statistical significance between edentulous and others
Relationships between colony amounts of Candida species, age, and number of remaining teeth in carriers wearing dentures
|
| Non- | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log CFU | Number of remaining teeth | Age | Log CFU | Number of remaining teeth | Age | |
| Log CFU | –0.40 (<0.01) | –0.18 (0.09) | –0.38 (<0.01) | 0.10 (0.45) | ||
| Number of remaining teeth | –0.40 (<0.01) | –0.34 (<0.01) | –0.38 (<0.01) | –0.40 (<0.01) | ||
| Age | –0.18 (0.09) | –0.34 (<0.01) | 0.10 (0.45) | –0.40 (<0.01) | ||
Value shows Spearman’s correlation coefficient (p-value)
Relationship between age, number of remaining teeth, and colony amounts of Candida by logistic regression modelsa
|
| |||||
| Variable | Crude partial regression coefficient | Adjusted partial regression coefficient | 95% CI |
| |
| First step | Number of remaining teeth | -0.06 | 0.94 | 0.53–0.94 | 0.053 |
| Age | 0.01 | 1.02 | 0.95–1.08 | 0.65 | |
| Second (final) step | Number of remaining teeth | -0.07 | 0.94 | 0.88–0.99 | 0.03 |
| Non- albicans ( | |||||
| Variable | Partial regression coefficient | Adjusted partial regression coefficient | 95% CI |
| |
| First step | Number of remaining teeth | -0.11 | 0.90 | 0.82–0.98 | 0.02 |
| Age | -0.02 | 0.62 | 0.90–1.06 | 0.62 | |
| Second (final) step | Number of remaining teeth | -0.10 | 0.91 | 0.83–0.98 | 0.02 |
aDependent variable: log CFU ≥ 1.5; 1, log CFU < 1.5; 0