Literature DB >> 28146314

How coagulation zone size is underestimated in computer modeling of RF ablation by ignoring the cooling phase just after RF power is switched off.

Ramiro M Irastorza1,2, Macarena Trujillo3, Enrique Berjano4.   

Abstract

All the numerical models developed for radiofrequency ablation so far have ignored the possible effect of the cooling phase (just after radiofrequency power is switched off) on the dimensions of the coagulation zone. Our objective was thus to quantify the differences in the minor radius of the coagulation zone computed by including and ignoring the cooling phase. We built models of RF tumor ablation with 2 needle-like electrodes: a dry electrode (5 mm long and 17G in diameter) with a constant temperature protocol (70°C) and a cooled electrode (30 mm long and 17G in diameter) with a protocol of impedance control. We observed that the computed coagulation zone dimensions were always underestimated when the cooling phase was ignored. The mean values of the differences computed along the electrode axis were always lower than 0.15 mm for the dry electrode and 1.5 mm for the cooled electrode, which implied a value lower than 5% of the minor radius of the coagulation zone (which was 3 mm for the dry electrode and 30 mm for the cooled electrode). The underestimation was found to be dependent on the tissue characteristics: being more marked for higher values of specific heat and blood perfusion and less marked for higher values of thermal conductivity.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation; radiofrequency heating; tumor ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28146314     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  2 in total

1.  Effects of control temperature, ablation time, and background tissue in radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: A computer modeling study.

Authors:  Ricardo Rivas; Rudy B Hijlkema; Ludo J Cornelissen; Thomas C Kwee; Paul C Jutte; Peter M A van Ooijen
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.648

2.  How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices.

Authors:  Macarena Trujillo; Punit Prakash; Pegah Faridi; Aleksandar Radosevic; Sergio Curto; Fernando Burdio; Enrique Berjano
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.