PURPOSE: To compare the performance of children born premature with low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) with that of children born at term, within the age range of one to three years, regarding child development in the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 150 infants born premature (experimental group) and at term (control group) divided into eight groups with respect to weight (low birth weight: <2500 grams and very low birth weight: <1500 grams) and age range (aged 12 to 24 and 25 to 36 months). The control groups were paired with the experimental groups as for gender, chronological age, and socioeconomic level. Assessment comprised the application of anamnesis protocol, socioeconomic classification, and Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST-II). Corrected age was calculated for premature children up to 24 months of age. Descriptive statistical analysis and the Student's t-test were used. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between the groups of infants born premature and at term for all domains evaluated. CONCLUSION: The performance of infants born premature was lower than that of infants born at term regarding the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains. In this study, the preterm groups presented different performances, i.e., normative, average, and below average performances were observed within the same group.
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of children born premature with low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth-weight (VLBW) with that of children born at term, within the age range of one to three years, regarding child development in the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 150 infants born premature (experimental group) and at term (control group) divided into eight groups with respect to weight (low birth weight: <2500 grams and very low birth weight: <1500 grams) and age range (aged 12 to 24 and 25 to 36 months). The control groups were paired with the experimental groups as for gender, chronological age, and socioeconomic level. Assessment comprised the application of anamnesis protocol, socioeconomic classification, and Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST-II). Corrected age was calculated for premature children up to 24 months of age. Descriptive statistical analysis and the Student's t-test were used. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between the groups of infants born premature and at term for all domains evaluated. CONCLUSION: The performance of infants born premature was lower than that of infants born at term regarding the gross motor, fine motor-adaptive, personal-social and language domains. In this study, the preterm groups presented different performances, i.e., normative, average, and below average performances were observed within the same group.
Authors: Maria de Jesus Torres Pacheco; Fernanda T Orsati; Paulo Guirro Laurence; Héron Máximo da Cunha Gonçalves; Talyta Garcia da Silva Ribeiro; Marcone Barbosa Pacheco; Maria Augusta Braghin Vantini; Patricia Botelho da Silva; Rute Cordeiro Tomás; Pascale Engel de Abreu; Elizeu Coutinho Macedo Journal: Heliyon Date: 2019-09-04
Authors: Abiodun Adanikin; Deborah A Lawlor; Jill P Pell; Scott M Nelson; Gordon C S Smith; Stamatina Iliodromiti Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-10-11 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Man Zhang; Marufu Martin Gazimbi; Zhong Chen; Bin Zhang; Yanru Chen; Yizhen Yu; Jie Tang Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Denise de Almeida Maia; Farid Bardid; Tobias Koch; Paola Okuda; George Ploubidis; Anders Nordahl-Hansen; Michael Eid; Hugo Cogo-Moreira Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-01-05