Literature DB >> 2814553

Magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of four pulse sequences in assessing primary bone tumours.

M Graif1, J M Pennock, J Pringle, D R Sweetnam, A J Jelliffe, G M Bydder, I R Young.   

Abstract

A prospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was carried out in 13 patients (19 examinations) with primary bone tumours to assess the relative value of each of four pulse sequences in showing the extent and nature of the lesion. The four pulse sequences used were a T1-weighted spin-echo (SE544/44), a T2-weighted spin echo (SE1500/80), a short TI inversion recovery (STIR) (IR500/100/44), and a partial saturation (PS) (PS500/22) with field echo data collection. For soft tissue disease the combination of PS and STIR gave better definition of the boundary of the tumour than the more conventional T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences. For the demonstration of bone cortex, periosteal change and calcification, T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences were better. However, for calcified tissues, plain radiographs were better than either MRI combination. On the assumption that plain films will be available in all cases, PS and STIR sequences could therefore be substituted for T1 and T2-weighted spin echo sequences allowing an increase in soft tissue detectability for lesions in both red and yellow marrow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2814553     DOI: 10.1007/BF00368612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

1.  NORMAL VARIATIONS WITH AGING OF THE AMOUNT OF HEMATOPOIETIC TISSUE IN BONE MARROW FROM THE ANTERIOR ILIAC CREST. A STUDY MADE FROM 177 CASES OF SUDDEN DEATH EXAMINED BY NECROPSY.

Authors:  R J HARTSOCK; E B SMITH; C S PETTY
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  MR imaging: clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence.

Authors:  G M Bydder; I R Young
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of primary malignant bone tumors.

Authors:  J L Bloem; R G Bluemm; A H Taminiau; A T van Oosterom; J Stolk; J Doornbos
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Musculoskeletal tumors: improved depiction with linear combinations of MR images.

Authors:  D N Levin; A Herrmann; T Spraggins; P A Collins; L B Dixon; M A Simon; A E Stillman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Multipurpose NMR imaging using stimulated echoes.

Authors:  D Matthaei; J Frahm; A Haase; K D Merboldt; W Hänicke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Chemical shift imaging of bone marrow: preliminary experience.

Authors:  G L Wismer; B R Rosen; R Buxton; D D Stark; T J Brady
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  H Pettersson; D J Hamlin; A Mancuso; K N Scott
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1985 May-Jun

8.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of a fibrosarcoma tumor implanted in the rat.

Authors:  K L Moon; P L Davis; L Kaufman; L E Crooks; P E Sheldon; T Miller; A C Brito; J C Watts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Bone tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Zimmer; T H Berquist; R A McLeod; F H Sim; D J Pritchard; T C Shives; L E Wold; G R May
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of primary tumours and tumour-like lesions of bone.

Authors:  K Bohndorf; M Reiser; B Lochner; W Féaux de Lacroix; W Steinbrich
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.