| Literature DB >> 28145471 |
Jing Ke1, Ye Liu1, Jin Yang1, Ran Lu1, Qing Tian1, Wenfang Hou1, Guang Wang1,2, Rui Wei1, Tianpei Hong1.
Abstract
Metformin orEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28145471 PMCID: PMC5286534 DOI: 10.1038/srep41085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Synergistic effects of metformin and liraglutide on PA-induced endothelial dysfunction in primary HUVECs.
(a) Dose-dependent effects of PA on endothelial function in HUVECs, including intracellular ROS production (upper panel), supernatant NO level (middle panel), and p-eNOS protein level (lower panel). HUVECs were pre-treated with different concentrations of metformin (b) and liraglutide (c) alone or the combination of both (d) for 2 h and then exposed to PA for additional 22 h. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 4. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); #P < 0.05 (vs. PA). Met, metformin; Lira, liraglutide.
Figure 2The effects of combined treatment with metformin and liraglutide on vascular function in ApoE−/− mice.
Eight-week-old male ApoE−/− mice were fed with high fat diet (HFD) for eight weeks and treated with metformin (100 mg/kg per day, via drinking water) and/or liraglutide (30 μg/kg per day, ip, twice daily) during the final four weeks. (a) Weight gains; (b) Vascular function as indicated by acetylcholine (Ach)-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilation in aortic rings; (c) Representative images of HE staining and p-eNOS immunostaining; (d) Quantitation of immunostaining in the vascular tissue. Normal denotes wild-type mice fed with normal diet, while Con (control), Met (metformin) and Lira (liraglutide) denote HFD-fed ApoE−/− mice without or with the corresponding treatment. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 6. *P < 0.05 (vs. normal); #P < 0.05 (vs. control). Scale bars: 100 μm.
Figure 3Metformin restored PA-impaired GLP-1R and PKA signalling in HUVECs.
(a) Impaired GLP-1R level and PKA phosphorylation in PA-treated HUVECs. (b) Dose-dependent effects of metformin on GLP-1R level and PKA phosphorylation in PA-impaired HUVECs. The protein levels of GLP-1R or p-PKA were normalized to GAPDH or total PKA proteins, respectively. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 4. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); #P < 0.05 (vs. PA). Met, metformin.
Figure 4GLP-1R and PKA signalling pathway were involved in the synergistic protective effects of metformin and liraglutide in HUVECs.
Cells were incubated with GLP-1R antagonist exendin (9–39) (a) or PKA inhibitor H89 (b) for 30 min, and then treated with metformin and liraglutide for 2 h, followed by exposure to PA for additional 21.5 h. Endothelial function including ROS production (upper panel), NO level (middle panel), and p-eNOS protein level (lower panel) were examined. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 4. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); #P < 0.05 (vs. PA); †P < 0.05 (vs. PA + metformin + liraglutide). Met, metformin; Lira, liraglutide; Ex-9, exendin (9–39).
Figure 5PKA signalling mediated the protective effects of metformin on PA-induced endothelial dysfunction.
HUVECs were incubated with exendin (9–39) (a) or H89 (c) for 30 min, and then treated with metformin for 2 h, followed by exposure to PA for additional 21.5 h. HUV-EC-C, a cell line of HUVECs, was transfected with GLP-1R siRNA (si-GLP-1R) (b) or PKA siRNA (si-PKA) (d) for 48 h, and then treated with metformin for 2 h, followed by exposure to PA for additional 22 h. Endothelial function including ROS production (upper panel), NO level (middle panel), and p-eNOS protein level (lower panel) were detected. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 5. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); #P < 0.05 (vs. PA); †P < 0.05 (vs. PA + metformin). Met, metformin; Ex-9, exendin (9–39).
Figure 6Metformin rescued the impaired GLP-1R level and PKA phosphorylation in PA-treated HUVECs via AMPK pathway.
HUVECs were pre-treated with AMPK activator AICAR for 2.5 h, or with AMPK inhibitor compound C for 30 min and then treated with metformin (1.0 mmol/L) alone (a,b) or metformin (0.1 mmol/L) and liraglutide (3 nmol/L) combination (c,d) for 2 h, followed by exposure to PA for additional 21.5 h. The protein levels of GLP-1R (a,c) or p-PKA (b,d) were normalized to GAPDH or total PKA proteins, respectively. Data are shown as means ± SD. n = 4. *P < 0.05 (vs. control); #P < 0.05 (vs. PA); †P < 0.05 (vs. PA + metformin or PA + metformin + liraglutide). Met, metformin; Lira, liraglutide; CC, compound C.
Figure 7Proposed scheme for the synergistic protective effects of metformin and liraglutide in lipotoxicity-induced endothelial dysfunction.
Palmitic acid (PA)-induced endothelial dysfunction is characterized by increased ROS production, decreased NO level and reduced eNOS phosphorylation. Treatment with metformin or liraglutide alone can prevent endothelial cells from the PA-induced dysfunction. Combination treatment with metformin and liraglutide has a synergistic effect on the PA-induced endothelial dysfunction. In addition, metformin upregulates GLP-1R and its downstream PKA signalling, which may account for its synergistic protective effects with liraglutide in the PA-impaired endothelial cells. Metformin may also activate PKA signalling in a GLP-1R-independent manner. The above effects of metformin are mediated via AMPK pathway. The red arrows denote our novel findings in the present study.