Literature DB >> 28145105

A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals.

A Toledo-Chávarri1,2, M Rué2,3,4, N Codern-Bové5,6, M Carles-Lavila4,7, L Perestelo-Pérez2,8,9, M J Pérez-Lacasta4,7, M Feijoo-Cid10,11,12.   

Abstract

This qualitative study evaluates a decision aid that includes the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening and analyses women's perception of the information received and healthcare professionals' perceptions of the convenience of providing it. Seven focus groups of women aged 40-69 years (n = 39) and two groups of healthcare professionals (n = 23) were conducted in Catalonia and the Canary Islands. The focus groups consisted of guided discussions regarding decision-making about breast cancer screening, and acceptability and feasibility of the decision aid. A content analysis was performed. Women positively value receiving information regarding the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. Several women had difficulties understanding some concepts, especially those regarding overdiagnosis. Women preferred to share the decisions on screening with healthcare professionals. The professionals noted the lack of inclusion of some harms and benefits in the decision aid, and proposed improving the clarity of the statistical information. The information on overdiagnosis generates confusion among women and controversy among professionals. Faced with the new information presented by the decision aid, the majority of women prefer shared decision-making; however, its feasibility might be limited by a lack of knowledge and attitudes of rejection from healthcare professionals.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer screening; decision aid; decision-making; patients’ information

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28145105     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  11 in total

1.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott Klarenbach; Nicki Sims-Jones; Gabriela Lewin; Harminder Singh; Guylène Thériault; Marcello Tonelli; Marion Doull; Susan Courage; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Xiaofei He; Karen E Schifferdecker; Elissa M Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors Influencing Pregnant Women's Use of Patient Decision Aids and Decision Making on Prenatal Screening: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Razieh Zahedi; Leila Nemati-Anaraki; Shahram Sedghi; Mamak Shariat
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-12

4.  How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Tomas Rozbroj; Romi Haas; Denise A O'Connor; Rae Thomas; Kirsten McCaffery; Stacy Carter; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Feasibility and acceptability of personalised breast cancer screening (DECIDO study): protocol of a single-arm proof-of-concept trial.

Authors:  Montserrat Martínez-Alonso; Montserrat Rué; Anna Pons-Rodriguez; Carles Forné Izquierdo; Jordi Vilaplana-Mayoral; Inés Cruz-Esteve; Isabel Sánchez-López; Mercè Reñé-Reñé; Cristina Cazorla; Marta Hernández-Andreu; Gisela Galindo-Ortego; Montserrat Llorens Gabandé; Celmira Laza-Vásquez; Pau Balaguer-Llaquet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study.

Authors:  Celmira Laza-Vásquez; Núria Codern-Bové; Àngels Cardona-Cardona; Maria José Hernández-Leal; Maria José Pérez-Lacasta; Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila; Montserrat Rué
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France.

Authors:  Aïm-Eusébi Amélie; Yannick Ruelle; Bernard Frèche; Mélanie Houllemare; Aurélie Bonillo; Laurie Bouaziz; Cédric Rat; Xavier Gocko; Catherine Cerisey; Isabelle Aubin-Auger; Emilie Ferrat
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Kristin G Maki; Gratianne Vaisson; Jeanette Finderup; Krystina B Lewis; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Caroline Beaudoin; Sandrine Comeau; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Translation and cultural adaptation of a prostate cancer screening decision aid: a qualitative study in Portugal.

Authors:  Sofia Baptista; Bruno Heleno; Marta Pinto; Bruna Guimarães; Diogo China; João Pedro Ramos; Andreia Teixeira; Kathryn L Taylor; Carlos Martins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique.

Authors:  María José Hernández-Leal; Núria Codern-Bové; María José Pérez-Lacasta; Angels Cardona; Carmen Vidal-Lancis; Misericòrdia Carles-Lavila
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.