Literature DB >> 28145042

Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: Results of a multicenter registry and meta-analysis.

Tyler L Bloomer1,2, Georges E El-Hayek3, Michael C McDaniel3, Breck C Sandvall2, Henry A Liberman3, Chandan M Devireddy3, Gautam Kumar3, Pete P Fong1,2, Wissam A Jaber3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
BACKGROUND: The use of CDT for the treatment of acute submassive and massive PE is increasing in frequency. However, its safety and efficacy have not been well elucidated.
METHODS: This study is made of two parts: one is a two-center registry of acute PE patients treated with CDT. The safety outcome evaluated was any major complication including fatal, intracranial (ICH), intraocular, or retroperitoneal hemorrhage or any overt bleeding requiring transfusion or surgical repair. The efficacy outcome was acute change in invasive pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). The second part is a meta-analysis of all contemporary studies that used CDT for PE. Reported outcomes are the same as in the registry, with the addition of right ventricular to left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio change.
RESULTS: In the registry, 137 patients were included (age 59 ± 15, 50% male, 88% submassive PE). ICH occurred in two patients and major complications in 13 (9.4%). PASP decreased post procedure by 19 ± 15 mm Hg (95% CI 16-23). In the meta-analysis, 16 studies were included with 860 patients. Rate of ICH was 0.35% and the major complication rate was 4.65%, most requiring transfusion only. In-hospital mortality was 12.9% in the massive and 0.74% in the submassive group. All studies showed improvement in PASP and/or RV/LV ratio post CDT.
CONCLUSIONS: CDT is associated with a low major complication rate. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy relative to anticoagulation alone.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catheter-directed thrombolysis; meta-analysis; pulmonary embolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28145042     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  25 in total

1.  The role of interventional radiology in the management of hemodynamically compromised patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Arabi; Joseph J Gemmete; Yaseen Arabi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The safety and efficacy of systemic versus catheter-based therapies: application of a prognostic model by a pulmonary embolism response team.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Iskandar; Essa Hariri; Christopher Kanaan; Nicholas Kassis; Hayaan Kamran; Denise Sese; Colin Wright; Mark Marinescu; Scott J Cameron
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Catheter directed compared to systemically delivered thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed K Pasha; Muhammad Umer Siddiqui; Muhammad Danial Siddiqui; Adnan Ahmed; Ammar Abdullah; Irbaz Riaz; M Hassan Murad; Haraldur Bjarnason; Waldemar E Wysokinski; Robert D McBane
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Advances in Percutaneous Management of Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Jimmy Kerrigan; Michael Morse; Elias Haddad; Elisabeth Willers; Chand Ramaiah
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  Catheter-directed interventions compared with systemic thrombolysis achieve improved ventricular function recovery at a potentially lower complication rate for acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Efthymios D Avgerinos; Adham N Abou Ali; Nathan L Liang; Belinda Rivera-Lebron; Catalin Toma; Robert Maholic; Michel S Makaroun; Rabih A Chaer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2018-03-31

6.  Cost-effectiveness microsimulation of catheter-directed thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism using a right ventricular function model.

Authors:  Stefanie E Mason; Jinyi Zhu; Farbod N Rahaghi; George R Washko; Ankur Pandya
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Is there an optimal "door to cath time" in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with catheter-directed thrombolysis?

Authors:  Aranyak Rawal; Devarshi Ardeshna; Kirstin Hesterberg; Brandon Cave; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

8.  Safety and efficacy of catheter-directed therapy versus anticoagulation alone in a higher-risk acute pulmonary embolism population.

Authors:  Andrew Putnam; Kyle Carey; Alexandru Marginean; Anthony Serritella; Janet Friant; John Blair; Atman Shah; Sandeep Nathan; Matthew Churpek; Jonathan Paul
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel; Ignacio Neumann; Walter Ageno; Rebecca Beyth; Nathan P Clark; Adam Cuker; Barbara A Hutten; Michael R Jaff; Veena Manja; Sam Schulman; Caitlin Thurston; Suresh Vedantham; Peter Verhamme; Daniel M Witt; Ivan D Florez; Ariel Izcovich; Robby Nieuwlaat; Stephanie Ross; Holger J Schünemann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Yuan Zhang; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

10.  Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: The SUNSET sPE Trial.

Authors:  Efthymios D Avgerinos; Wissam Jaber; Joan Lacomis; Kyle Markel; Michael McDaniel; Belinda N Rivera-Lebron; Charles B Ross; Jacob Sechrist; Catalin Toma; Rabih Chaer
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 11.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.