Yoshitsugu Shibayama1,2, Kenjiro Namikawa3, Miyuki Sone4, Akira Takahashi1, Arata Tsutsumida1, Shunsuke Sugawara4, Yasuaki Arai4, Yukiko Aihara5, Shigenobu Suzuki5, Juichiro Nakayama2, Shinichi Imafuku2, Naoya Yamazaki1. 1. Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. 2. Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0133, Japan. 3. Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. knamikaw@ncc.go.jp. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. 5. Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although both immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies such as MEK inhibitors have been evaluated in metastatic uveal melanoma, the efficacy of these therapies is modest to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy for liver metastasis from uveal melanoma in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the clinical data of patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma who received TACE therapy using cisplatin (70 mg/m2) and gelatin sponge between 1997 and 2008. RESULTS: We identified 29 eligible patients. The overall response rate was 21%. The median survival time was 23 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 72.4, 39.4, and 0%, respectively. The favorable prognostic factors were partial response and stable disease, <25% of the tumor volume within the liver at baseline, and normal serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and normal alkaline phosphatase at baseline. Among them, normal LDH at baseline was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. The common adverse events (AEs) were liver enzyme elevation (100%), nausea (72.4%), abdominal pain (65.5%), vomiting (55.2%), post-embolization syndrome (34.5% of patients, 9.6% of TACE procedures), and pyrexia (24.1%). Grade ≥3 AEs consisted of aspartate aminotransferase elevation (34.5%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (51.7%), and serum creatinine elevation (3.4%). CONCLUSION: TACE therapy has a certain degree of clinical efficacy with a tolerable toxicity and, therefore, can still be one of the treatment options. However, considering the lack of long-term efficacy of this therapy, further treatment strategies need to be developed.
BACKGROUND: Although both immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies such as MEK inhibitors have been evaluated in metastatic uveal melanoma, the efficacy of these therapies is modest to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy for liver metastasis from uveal melanoma in an Asian population. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the clinical data of patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma who received TACE therapy using cisplatin (70 mg/m2) and gelatin sponge between 1997 and 2008. RESULTS: We identified 29 eligible patients. The overall response rate was 21%. The median survival time was 23 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 72.4, 39.4, and 0%, respectively. The favorable prognostic factors were partial response and stable disease, <25% of the tumor volume within the liver at baseline, and normal serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and normal alkaline phosphatase at baseline. Among them, normal LDH at baseline was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. The common adverse events (AEs) were liver enzyme elevation (100%), nausea (72.4%), abdominal pain (65.5%), vomiting (55.2%), post-embolization syndrome (34.5% of patients, 9.6% of TACE procedures), and pyrexia (24.1%). Grade ≥3 AEs consisted of aspartate aminotransferase elevation (34.5%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (51.7%), and serum creatinine elevation (3.4%). CONCLUSION: TACE therapy has a certain degree of clinical efficacy with a tolerable toxicity and, therefore, can still be one of the treatment options. However, considering the lack of long-term efficacy of this therapy, further treatment strategies need to be developed.
Authors: J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Klaus G Griewank; Michelle B Crosby; Maria C Garrido; Swapna Vemula; Thomas Wiesner; Anna C Obenauf; Werner Wackernagel; Gary Green; Nancy Bouvier; M Mert Sozen; Gail Baimukanova; Ritu Roy; Adriana Heguy; Igor Dolgalev; Raya Khanin; Klaus Busam; Michael R Speicher; Joan O'Brien; Boris C Bastian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sanjay Gupta; Agop Y Bedikian; Judy Ahrar; Joe Ensor; Kamran Ahrar; David C Madoff; Michael J Wallace; Ravi Murthy; Alda Tam; Patrick Hwu Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Stefan Diem; Benjamin Kasenda; Juan Martin-Liberal; Alexander Lee; Dharmisha Chauhan; Martin Gore; James Larkin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Takami Sato; David J Eschelman; Carin F Gonsalves; Mizue Terai; Inna Chervoneva; Peter A McCue; Jerry A Shields; Carol L Shields; Akira Yamamoto; David Berd; Michael J Mastrangelo; Kevin L Sullivan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Y Bedikian; S S Legha; G Mavligit; C H Carrasco; S Khorana; C Plager; N Papadopoulos; R S Benjamin Journal: Cancer Date: 1995-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: T Susanna Meijer; Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Bas Boekestijn; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Denise E Hilling; Jacob Lutjeboer; Jaap Vuijk; Christian H Martini; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Fred G J Tijl; Frank M Speetjens; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 5.344