Heekyung Hwang1, Yong-Pil Cheon1. 1. Department of Biology, Institute Basic Sciences, Sungshin Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
Intact germinal vesicle (GV) arrest and release are essential for maintaining the fertility of mammals inducing human. Intact germinal vesicle release, maturation of oocytes is maintained by very complex procedures along with folliculogenesis and is a critical step for embryonic development. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) has been suggested a key factor for meiotic arrest but so far its mechanisms are controversy. In this study we examine the effects of cGMP on germinal vesicle breakdown in cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocytes. Spontaneous maturation was inhibited by a cGMP agonist, 8-Br-cGMP with concentration dependent manners both in cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocytes. The inhibitory effect was more severe in denuded oocytes than cumulus-enclosed oocytes. The Rp-8-Br-cGMP and Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP did not severely block GVB compared to 8-Br-cGMP. The spontaneous GVB inhibitory effects were different by the existence of cumulus. Based on them it is suggested that the cumulus modulates the role of cGMP in GV arrest.
Intact germinal vesicle (GV) arrest and release are essential for maintaining the fertility of mammals inducing human. Intact germinal vesicle release, maturation of oocytes is maintained by very complex procedures along with folliculogenesis and is a critical step for embryonic development. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) has been suggested a key factor for meiotic arrest but so far its mechanisms are controversy. In this study we examine the effects of cGMP on germinal vesicle breakdown in cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocytes. Spontaneous maturation was inhibited by a cGMP agonist, 8-Br-cGMP with concentration dependent manners both in cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocytes. The inhibitory effect was more severe in denuded oocytes than cumulus-enclosed oocytes. The Rp-8-Br-cGMP and Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP did not severely block GVB compared to 8-Br-cGMP. The spontaneous GVB inhibitory effects were different by the existence of cumulus. Based on them it is suggested that the cumulus modulates the role of cGMP in GVarrest.
The meiotic cell cycle in mammalian oocytes proceeds up to the diplotene or dictiate
stage of the first prophase and stay at this phase before LH surge (Hubbard & Terranova, 1982; Dutta et al., 2016). During growth phase of the
follicle, the oocyte remains the arrested condition at prophase I. At this time it
is incompetent to complete meiosis. The germinal vesicle intact oocytes in
cumulus-oocyte-complex removed from mature antral follicles spontaneously progress
to the metaphase II stage by culture without gonadotropin (Pincus & Enzmann, 1935; Erickson & Sorrenson, 1974). On the other hand, the oocytes enclosed
in an antral follicle, do not enter meiosis even though these follicles are removed
from their environment. By the adding of gonadotropin or releasing from follicle the
oocyte resume meiosis. Therefore, some low molecular weight substances in the
follicular fluid have been suggested as a mediator for meiotic arrest (Eppig et al., 1985; Cheon, 2004, Hwang & Cheon,
2013).Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a key signaling mediator in oocyte for
meiotic prophase arrest in most species studied. Elevated cAMP concentration in the
oocyte has been demonstrated to maintain meiotic arrest and a transient decrease in
cAMP levels in the oocytes is thought to be a primary trigger for resumption of
meiosis. cAMP works through protein kinase A (PKA)-mediated phosphorylation of
maturation promoting factor (Jones, 2008).
The levels of cAMP can be modulated by the activity of cAMP phosphodiesterase, PDE3A
in the oocyte (Hambleton et al., 2005). On the
other hand, cAMP can be transported from the surrounding cumulus cells (Norris et al., 2009) or generated by oocyte
itself through the activation of heterotrimeric G protein (Gαs)-linked
receptor, GPR3 or GRP12 G (Mehlmann, 2005).In the case of cyclic GMP, it has been shown to increase in the whole ovaries in
hamsters until the LH surge when cAMP rises and cGMP falls (Hubbard, 1980). cGMP works in maintaining of the meiotic arrest
in oocyte and that this inhibition is dose and time dependent and expressed only in
oocytes with intact cumulus (Jankowski et al.,
1997; Zhang et al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2012; Egbert et al., 2014; Shuhaibar
et al., 2015). It appears that the inhibitory action of cGMP on oocyte
maturation is mediated by the cumulus oophorous while cAMP acts directly on the
oocyte (Hubbard & Terranova, 1982).
However, so far, the essentiality of cumulus cells for cGMP in oocyte is
controversy. Therefore, in the present study, we investigate whether the
cGMP-mediated meiotic arrest can be possible without cumulus cells during in
vitro culture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1. Animals and oocyte collection
CD1mice were maintained on a 10 hr light and 14 hr dark cycle under standard
vivarium condition and were supplied with food and water ad
libitum. Immature female mice (20-24 days old) were injected with 5
IU of pregnant mares serum gonadotropin (PMSG; i.p.) to enhance multiple
follicular development. PMSG primed mice are sacrificed after 46 hr and obtained
the ovary. Oocytes were collected by ovarian follicular puncture with a needle
under a dissecting microscope. To get cumulus free GV oocyte, the cumulus mass
were removed with a fine-bore pipetted. The entire procedure did within 20 min
after puncture and only the healthy oocytes and cumulus-enclosed oocytes were
chosen for examination. Cumulus-oocyte complexes and oocytes were transferred
into BWW medium containing 0.4% BSA and cultured.
2. Culture of treatment of chemical
Oocytes (8-10 oocytes/drop) were cultured in 10 µL drops of BWW in mineral oil
(Sigma) or 15 hr at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere conditioning 5%
CO2. The progression of meiotic maturation was scored by
observing the breakdown of germinal vesicles (GVB) and the subsequent appearance
of polar bodies with an inverted microscope. Cell permeable cGMP analogs,
8-Bromoguanosine 3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate (8-Br-cGMP; 1 mM or 1 M),
Rp-8-Bromo-cGMPs (1 mM or 1 M), Rp-pCPT-8-Bromo-cGMP (1 mM or 1 M) were treated
into the medium and GV intact oocytes were cultured. The progression of meiotic
maturation was scored by observing the breakdown of germinal vesicles (GVB) and
the subsequent appearance of polar bodies with an inverted microscope.
3. Statistical analysis
Chi-squared test was used in statistical analysis, and a P value
less than 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
1. cGMP agonist inhibited meiotic resumption
To know the difference of cGMP sensitivity to meiotic arrest by the existence of
cumulus, cell permeable cGMP analog, 8-Bromoguanosine 3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate
(8-Br-cGMP) was treated to GV intact oocytes as mentioned in Materials and
Methods. GVB was inhibited concentration dependently by the 8-Br-cGMP in the
cumulus-enclosed oocyte (Fig. 1A). In
addition, it also inhibited GVB in denuded oocytes with concentration dependent
manner (Fig. 1B). At 6 hr of incubation,
the GV intact percentage of cumulus-enclosed oocytes was 0% at control, 21% at 1
mM 8-Br-cGMP, and 41% at 1M 8-Br-cGMP. On the other hand, in the case of denuded
oocyte, the GV intact percentage was 0% at control, 1.4% at 1 mM 8-Br-cGMP, and
95% at 1 M 8-Br-cGMP. At 15 hr of incubation, the intact percentage was 0% at
control, 0% at 1 mM 8-Br-cGMP, and 11% at 1 m 8-Br-cGMP. In the case of denuded
oocyte, GV intact percentage was 0% both at control and 1 mM 8-Br-cGMP, and 85%
at 1 M 8-Br-cGMP.
Fig. 1
GVB was severely inhibited by 8-Br-cGMP, a cGMP agonist in
cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were cultivated in medium containing 0.001 mM or 1 mM
8-Br-cGMPs for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under the
investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3 hr,
6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV, germinal vesicle. *:
P<0.05 versus control.
The inhibitory effect of 8-Br-cGMP was more severe in denuded oocytes than
cumulus-enclosed oocytes. At 1 M 8-Br-cGMP, the GVB inhibition was significantly
higher in denuded oocytes than cumulus-enclosed oocytes at all time points
(Fig. 1).
GVB was severely inhibited by 8-Br-cGMP, a cGMP agonist in
cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were cultivated in medium containing 0.001 mM or 1 mM
8-Br-cGMPs for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under the
investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3 hr,
6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV, germinal vesicle. *:
P<0.05 versus control.
2. Effects of Rp-8-Br-cGMP and Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP on GV arrest
The cell permeable cGMP analog Rp-8-Br-cGMP and RP-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP but have a
different function from 8-Br-cGMP were treated to the GV intact oocytes.
Rp-8-Br-cGMp and Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP have antagonistic effects in cGMP target
cellular mediator, a cGMP-dependent protein kinase. In cumulus-enclosed oocyte,
Rp-8-Br-cGMP did not block GVB (Fig. 2A).
In denuded oocyte, it also did not block the GVB (Fig. 2B). However, there were no concentration dependent manners in
GVarrest. At 6 hr of culture, GV intact percentages in cumulus-enclosed oocytes
were 0% both at control and 1 M Rp-8-Br-cGMP, and 48% at 1 mM Rp-8-Br-cGMP. In
denuded oocytes, the GV intact percentages were 4% at control, 70% at 1 mM
Rp-8-Br-cGMP, and 20% at 1M Rp-8-Br-cGMP. At 15 hr after culture, the GVarrest
percentages in cumulus-enclosed oocytes were 0% both at control and 1 M
Rp-8-Br-cGMP, and 10% at 1 mM Rp-8-Br-cGMP. In denuded oocytes, the GVarrest
percentages were 0% at control, 10 % at 1 mM Rp-8-Br-cGMP, and 2.5% at 1 M
Rp-8-Br-cGMP (Fig. 2). Compared with the
results of 8-Br-cGMP in denuded oocytes, the GVB blocking effects is high in
8-Br-cGMP.
Fig. 2
cGMP antagonist Rp-8-Br-cGMP had opposite effect to cGMP agonist both
in cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were treated with 0.001 mM or 1 mM Rp-8-br-cGMP combined with
750 µM guanosine for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under the
investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3 hr,
6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV; germinal vesicle, Cont; control.*:
P<0.05 versus control.
cGMP antagonist Rp-8-Br-cGMP had opposite effect to cGMP agonist both
in cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were treated with 0.001 mM or 1 mM Rp-8-br-cGMP combined with
750 µM guanosine for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under the
investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3 hr,
6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV; germinal vesicle, Cont; control.*:
P<0.05 versus control.In the case of Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP, its effect on GVarrest was stronger than
Rp-8-Br-cGMP (Fig. 2 and 3). In cumulus-enclosed oocytes which were
cultured in Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP containing media, the GVarrest percenttages were
0% at control, 43% at 1 mM Rp-pCPT-8- Br-cGMP, and 9.5% at 1M Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP
after 6 hr of culture (Fig. 3). At 15 hr of
culture, the GVarrest percentages were 0% both control and 1 M
Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP, and 23% at 1 mM Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP. In cumulus-enclosed
oocytes, the GVarrest effect is similar between Rp-8-Br-cGMP and
Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP. In denuded oocyte, the GVarrest percentages after 6 hr of
culture were 40% at control and 73% both in 1 mM and 1 M Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP. At
15 hr of culture, the GVarrest percentages were 0% at control, 57% at 1 mM
Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP, and 60% at 1 M Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP. When compared with the
results of cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocytes, the inhibitory effects
of Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP severe in denuded oocytes (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Effects of cGMP antagonist Rp-pCPT-8-Bromo-cGMP on GV arrest in
cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were treated with 0.001 mM or 1 mM Rp-pCPT-8-br-cGMP combined
with 750 µM guanosine for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under
the investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3
hr, 6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV; germinal vesicle, Cont; control. *:
P<0.05 versus control.
Effects of cGMP antagonist Rp-pCPT-8-Bromo-cGMP on GV arrest in
cumulus-enclosed oocytes (A) and denuded oocytes (B).
GV oocytes were treated with 0.001 mM or 1 mM Rp-pCPT-8-br-cGMP combined
with 750 µM guanosine for 15 hr and nuclear status were determined under
the investigated microscope (Nomarski DIC modulated) at 0 hr, 1.5 hr, 3
hr, 6 hr, 9 hr and 15 hr. GV; germinal vesicle, Cont; control. *:
P<0.05 versus control.
DISCUSSION
Fertility of female is depending on the quantity and quality of follicles, and the
getting a competence for development in the oocyte is critical for oncogenesis.
Oocytes have to stay until ovulation at GV intact status, prophase I of meiosis. A
few of cellular molecules are known to be involved in this arrest. The well-known
molecules are cAMP and its metabolic materials. Cotreatment of FSH and adenosine
markedly inhibits the GVB of CEO in a dose-dependent manner (Mille & Behrman,
1986). Recently, we reported about the possible roles of adenosine and adenosine
receptor-mediated calcium signaling in GVarrest of oocytes enclosed with cumulus
(Hwang & Cheon, 2013). It supports the
role of calcium in cAMP action (Powers & Paleos,
1982; Preston et al., 1987). On
the other hand, cyclic GMP also is also suggested as a mediator for cAMP regulation
in oocyte. cGMP inhibit cAMP hydrolysis through PDE3A (Norris et al., 2009; Vaccari et
al., 2009).The cGMP levels in follicle are uniformly high (about 2-4 µM). Its levels are
decreased to 100 nM by LH surge. The level of cGMP in oocyte is also decreased
uniformly to about 100 nM and this decrease causes of meiotic restart (Shuhaibar et al., 2015). In follicle cGMP
producing guanylyl cyclase natriuretic peptide receptor 2 (NPR2, guanylyl cyclase B)
is present in all of the granulosa cells, but not in the oocyte (Jankowski et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 2010; Robinson et
al., 2012; Egbert et al., 2014).
Those are suggested that cGMP is originated from follicle cells. The cell permeable
cGMP analog, 8-Br-cGMP inhibits GVB with concentration-dependent manners both in
cumulus-enclosed oocytes and denuded oocyte. The effects of 8-Br-cGMP were stronger
in cumulus-enclosed oocytes than denuded oocytes. Its inhibitory effects were
continued until 15 hr of culture in denuded oocytes. Interestingly, the cumulus
decreased the effects of cGMP on the GVarrest. Such a responsibility of oocyte to
cGMP suggest that cumulus may modulate the cGMP effects on GVB arrest.The antagonists of cGMP in cellular signaling, Rp-8-Br-cGMP and Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP
were showed opposite effect to 8-Br-cGMP. However, its effects were specific to the
concentration of Rp-8-Br-cGMP in cumulus-enclosed oocytes but not in denuded
oocytes. In denuded oocytes, the spontaneous maturation processed dependently to the
concentration of Rp-8-Br-cGMP. In cumulus-enclosed oocytes, the effects of
Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP also had a similar pattern with the Rp-8-Br-cGMP concentration. In
denuded oocytes, Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP was significantly inhibited GVB in all groups
compared with control, though its GVB inhibitor effect were less than 8-Br-cGMP. The
responsibility to the Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMPthe Ministry of Education, Science and
Technology and Rp-8-Br-cGMP are typically different between cumulus-enclosed oocyte
and denuded oocytes. However, interestingly Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP inhibited severely
more than Rp-8-Br-cGMP at 1 mM but not 1 M. Such differences between antagonists for
cGMP may be originated from the difference of the affinity to the target molecule.
Based on them, it means that the sensitivity for GVarrest to cGMP may be modified
by cumulus cells.The cGMP transported from granulosa cells to oocyte through gap junction has been
suggested as a key factor for GVarrest. Based on the results, we know that the
responsibility to agonist or antagonist is modified by the cumulus. The GVarrest
was maintained in denuded oocyte by 8-Br-cGMP significantly compared with
Rp-8-Br-cGMP or Rp-pCPT-8-Br-cGMP. Put together, it suggests that the role of cGMP
for spontaneous GVB is modulated by cumulus.
Authors: Ryan Hambleton; Judith Krall; Eliso Tikishvili; Matthew Honeggar; Faiyaz Ahmad; Vincent C Manganiello; Matthew A Movsesian Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jeremy R Egbert; Leia C Shuhaibar; Aaron B Edmund; Dusty A Van Helden; Jerid W Robinson; Tracy F Uliasz; Valentina Baena; Andreas Geerts; Frank Wunder; Lincoln R Potter; Laurinda A Jaffe Journal: Development Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.868