| Literature DB >> 28144567 |
Elena Dilonardo1, Michele Penza2, Marco Alvisi2, Gennaro Cassano2, Cinzia Di Franco3, Francesco Palmisano4, Luisa Torsi4, Nicola Cioffi4.
Abstract
Pristine and electrochemically Pd-modified ZnO nanorods (ZnO NRs) were proposed as active sensing layers in chemiresistive gas sensors for hydrocarbon (HC) gas detection (e.g., CH4, C3H8, C4H10). The presence of Pd nanoparticles (NPs) on the surface of ZnO NRs, obtained after the thermal treatment at 550 °C, was revealed by morphological and surface chemical analyses, using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The effect of the Pd catalyst on the performance of the ZnO-based gas sensor was evaluated by comparing the sensing results with those of pristine ZnO NRs, at an operating temperature of 300 °C and for various HC gas concentrations in the range of 30-1000 ppm. The Pd-modified ZnO NRs showed a higher selectivity and sensitivity compared to pristine ZnO NRs. The mean sensitivity of Pd-modified ZnO NRs towards the analyzed HCs gases increased with the length of the hydrocarbon chain of the target gas molecule. Finally, the evaluation of the selectivity revealed that the presence or the absence of metal nanoparticles on ZnO NRs improves the selectivity in the detection of specific HCs gaseous molecules.Entities:
Keywords: Pd-modified ZnO; ZnO nanorods; chemiresistive gas sensor; electrosynthesis; hydrocarbon gas sensor
Year: 2017 PMID: 28144567 PMCID: PMC5238677 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.8.9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1A scheme of a Pd-modified rod-like ZnO-based chemiresistive gas sensor.
Figure 2XPS spectra of the chemical elements in pristine ZnO: Zn 2p and O 1s spectra, deconvoluted in two components (O–Zn and O–C), with the additional Pd 3d spectrum in Pd@ZnO.
XPS surface chemical composition of pristine and Pd-functionalized ZnO NRs, annealed at 550 °C. The value for O–Zn refers to the atomic percentage of oxygen bound to zinc.
| ZnO | Pd@ZnO | |
| C | 15.7% ± 0.5% | 13.5% ± 0.5% |
| O(total) | 44.5% ± 0.5% | 44.5% ± 0.5% |
| O–Zn | 39.6% ± 0.5% | 40.9% ± 0.5% |
| Zn | 39.8% ± 0.5% | 41.0% ± 0.5% |
| Pd | — | 1.0% ± 0.2% |
Figure 3SEM images of A) pristine and B) Pd-modified ZnO nanostructures, after thermal annealing at 550 °C. The inset shows the TEM image of Pd@ZnO NRs.
Figure 4A) Time response and B) calibration curves of the change of electrical resistance of chemiresistors based on pristine and Pd-modified ZnO NRs, exposed to different concentrations (30–1000 ppm) of butane (C4H10) at an operating temperature of 300 °C.
Figure 5Time response of A) pristine ZnO and B) Pd-modified ZnO, detected at with as-prepared sensors (t0) and after two months, exposed to different concentrations of butane (30–1000 ppm) at an operating temperature of 300 °C.
Comparison of the response time (tResponse) and recovery time (tRecovery) between pristine and Pd-modified ZnO NRs at various C4H10 concentrations.
| pristine ZnO NRs | Pd-modified ZnO NRs | pristine ZnO NRs | Pd-modified ZnO NRs | |
| 1000 | 445 ± 30 | 318 ± 30 | 600 ± 30 | 355± 30 |
| 500 | 495 ± 30 | 430 ± 30 | 641 ± 25 | 525 ± 30 |
| 100 | 526 ± 30 | 450 ± 30 | 645 ± 30 | 590 ± 30 |
| 50 | 533 ± 30 | 480 ± 30 | 700 ± 30 | 610 ± 30 |
| 30 | 538 ± 30 | 488 ± 30 | 730 ± 30 | 668 ± 30 |
Figure 6Mean sensitivity of pristine and Pd@ZnO towards CH4, C3H8, and C4H10 gases at an operating temperature of 300 °C.
Figure 7Mean sensitivity of pristine and Pd@ZnO NRs towards NO2 and C4H10 at an operating temperature of 300 °C.