| Literature DB >> 28144462 |
Mojgan Mirghafourvand1, Fahimeh Sehhati Shafaie1, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi2, Batoul Jabbari3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During recent decades, research in Iran in the area of the Quran and medical science has been seriously engaged in. With respect to the tendency toward spirituality and alternative medicine, we tried to find other aspects of the influence of the Quran.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometric Indices; Caesarean Section; Neonatal, Preterm Labor; Quran
Year: 2016 PMID: 28144462 PMCID: PMC5253461 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.35421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J ISSN: 2074-1804 Impact factor: 0.611
Figure 1.Flowchart of the Study
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants by Study Groups[a,b]
| Characteristics | Control Group n = 56 | Holy Quran Without Translation n = 57 | Holy Quran with Translation n = 55 | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28.0 (5.3) | 27.5 (5.2) | 26.2 (4.9) | [ |
| 15 - 24 | 20 (35.7) | 20 (35.1) | 22 (40.0) | [ |
| 25 - 34 | 32 (57.1) | 33 (57.9) | 32 (58.2) | |
| 35 - 45 | 4 (7.1) | 4 (7.0) | 1 (1.8) | |
|
| 5 (3.8) | 5.1 (3.9) | 4.1 (2.9) | [ |
|
| [ | |||
| Nullipara | 27 (48.2) | 33 (57.9) | 32 (58.2) | |
| Primipara | 29 (51.8) | 24 (42.1) | 23 (41.8) | |
| Having abortion history | 11 (19.6) | 11 (19.3) | 6 (10.9) | [ |
| Planned pregnancy | 46 (82.1) | 45 (78.9) | 46 (83.6) | [ |
|
| [ | |||
| Secondary school | 13 (23.2) | 15 (29.3) | 12 (21.8) | |
| High school | 10 (17.9) | 8 (14.0) | 11 (20.0) | |
| Diploma | 17 (30.4) | 20 (35.1) | 17 (30.9) | |
| University | 16 (28.6) | 14 (24.6) | 15 (27.3) | |
| Being housewife | 50 (89.3) | 57 (100) | 54 (98.2) | [ |
|
| [ | |||
| Elementary school | 3 (5.4) | 5 (8.8) | 3 (5.5) | |
| Secondary school | 9 (16.1) | 14 (24.6) | 13 (23.6) | |
| High school | 10 (17.9) | 10 (17.5) | 8 14.5) | |
| Diploma | 16 (28.6)16 | 16 (28.1) | 19 (34.5) | |
| University | 17 (30.4) | 12 (21.1) | 12 (21.8) | |
|
| [ | |||
| Employee | 9 (16.1) | 11 (19.3) | 6 (10.9) | |
| Worker | 7 (12.5) | 7 (12.3) | 6 (10.9) | |
| Shopkeeper | 13 (23.2) | 16 (28.1) | 16 (29.1) | |
| Other | 25 (44.6) | 23 (40.4) | 27 (49.1) | |
|
| [ | |||
| Enough | 13 (23.2) | 16 (28.1) | 15 (27.3) | |
| Relatively enough | 32 (57.1) | 33 (57.9) | 33 (60.3) | |
| Not enough | 11 (19.6) | 8 (14.0) | 7 (12.7) | |
|
| [ | |||
| Very much | 6 (10.7) | 11 (19.3) | 17 (30.6) | |
| Much | 33 (58.9) | 26 (45.6) | 23 (41.8) | |
| Average | 16 (28.6) | 19 (33.3) | 15 (27.3) | |
|
| [ | |||
| Male | 37 (67.3) | 29 (51.8) | 22 (40.7) | |
| Female | 18 (32.7) | 27 (48.2) | 32 (59.3) |
aThe data indicates the number (percent) unless specified.
bIn spouse’s educational level, one person was illiterate. In spouse’s job, two people were unemployed in the control group. In marital satisfaction, one person in the broadcast of the holy Quran without translation and control group reported very low rates.
dOne-way ANOVA test.
cFisher’s exact test.
eChi-square test.
Comparison of Delivery Type and Frequency of Preterm Labor by Study Groups[a,b,c]
| Outcomes | Int. 1 (n = 55) n (%) | Int. 2 (n = 57) n (%) | Comparison among the groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n = 56) n (%) | Int. 1 vs. control OR (95% CI) | P | Int. 2 vs. control(95% CI) | P | |||
|
| |||||||
|
| 0.6 (0.3 to 1.4) | 0.294 | 0.5 (0.2 to 1.2) | 0.156 | |||
| Vaginal | 29 (53.7) | 32 (57.1) | 24 (43.6) | ||||
| Emergency S-C[ | 5 (9.3) | 4 (7.1) | 6 (10.9) | ||||
| Elective S-C[ | 20 (37.0) | 20 (35.7) | 25 (45.5) | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| < 37 weeks | 3 (5.6) | 6 (10.7) | 9 (16.4) | ||||
| >37 weeks | 51 (94.4) | 50 (89.3) | 46 (83.6) | 0.3 (0.1 to 1.2) | 0.087 | 0.6 (0.2 to 1.9) | 0.393 |
Abbreviations: Int., intervention; SD: standard deviation; OR, odds ratio (95% confidence interval).
aInt. 1: Holy Quran with translation, Int. 2: Holy Quran without translation.
bLogistic regression test was used to compare groups. (emergency and elective caesarean were considered as a one group for comparison of delivery type between groups).
cThere was a drop of samples in each group at the end of the first month after the intervention.
dS-C: Caesarean section.
Comparison of Neonatal Anthropometric Indices by Study Groups[a,b,c]
| Outcomes | Int. 1 (n = 55) Mean (SD) | Int. 2 (n = 57) Mean (SD) | Control (n = 56) Mean (SD) | Comparison Among The Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Int. 1 vs. control MD (95% CI)* P | Int. 2 vs. control MD (95% CI)* P | Int. 1 vs. int. 2 MD (95% CI)* P | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| 3216.9 (401.9) | 3260.7 (371.6) | 3231.5 (448.5) | 9.3 (-161.2 to 179.8) 0.914 | 48.7 (120.3 to -217.7) 0.570 | -39.4 (-209.1 to 130.2) 0.647 |
|
| 49.5 (1.2) | 49.7 (1.1) | 49.6 (1.2) | -0.1 (-0.6 to 0.3) 0.463 | 0.1 (-0.4 to 0.5) 0.684 | -0.3 (-0.7 to 0.2) 0.254 |
|
| 34.3 (1.1) | 34.4 (1.0) | 34.4 (1.3) | -0.1 (-0.5 to 0.4) 0.709 | -0.0 (-0.4 to 0.4) 0.965 | -0.1 (-0.5 to 0.3) 0.676 |
Abbreviations: Int., intervention; SD, standard deviation; MD (95% CI), mean difference (95% confidence interval).
aInt. 1: Holy Quran with translation, 2: Holy Quran without translation.
bOne-way ANOVA with pospost-hoc (Turkey) test as was used for comparing groups.
cThere was a drop of samples in each group at the end of the first month after the intervention.