Literature DB >> 28144447

Whole-exome sequencing analysis of supernumerary teeth occurrence in Japanese individuals.

Masahiro Takahashi1, Kazuyoshi Hosomichi2, Tetsutaro Yamaguchi1, Keisuke Yano3, Takahiro Funatsu4, Mohamed Adel1, Shugo Haga1, Koutaro Maki1, Atsushi Tajima2.   

Abstract

A common disorder of human dentition is the existence of supernumerary teeth. Impacted supernumerary teeth occur most frequently in the maxillary incisor area and are termed mesiodens. We conducted whole-exome sequencing of non-syndromic Japanese individuals possessing supernumerary teeth to identify genes and/or loci involved in the pathogenesis of the condition.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28144447      PMCID: PMC5267165          DOI: 10.1038/hgv.2016.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genome Var        ISSN: 2054-345X


Teeth are an important vertebrate organ, especially in humans because of their use in feeding, mastication, and speech. Tooth development and formation involve various complex processes, including epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, that are precisely controlled by molecular signaling pathways at each developmental stage.[1] A common disorder found in human dentition is the existence of supernumerary teeth. There are 20 teeth in the primary dentition and 28 teeth, excluding third molars, in the permanent dentition. Supernumerary teeth are defined as extra teeth—more than the normal human complement.[2] The frequency of this condition in permanent dentition ranges from approximately 0.1 to 3.6%, with varied ranges among populations,[3] and is more prevalent among males than females, with a ratio of approximately 2:1.[4] Supernumerary teeth are classified by their various morphologies or location. The most common supernumerary teeth are located in the maxillary incisor area and are called mesiodens.[5] Mesiodens are typically conical supernumerary teeth that are small and peg-shaped. The autosomal-dominant transmission pattern of non-syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth has been reported.[6] Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a human syndrome that presents with supernumerary teeth. It is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by short stature, hypoplasia or aplasia of clavicles, delayed closure of the cranial fontanelles and sutures, maxillary hypoplasia, Wormian bones, frontal bossing, wide pubic symphysis, and dental abnormalities including supernumerary teeth.[7] Mutations in runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), an essential transcription factor for osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development[8], have been identified as a main cause for CCD.[9] In addition to CCD, other human syndromes are also associated with supernumerary teeth.[10] Various mouse models have been used to explore the etiology of supernumerary teeth and to identify candidate genes involved in the pathogenesis of this condition. Supernumerary teeth in the diastema region in front of the first molars are exhibited by Sprouty2 and Sprouty4 null mice (fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) antagonists), Tabby mice, which have a mutation in ectodysplasin (Eda), transgenic mice overexpressing Eda or ectodysplasin receptor (Edar), paired box 6 (Pax6) mutant mice, and growth arrest specific 1 (Gas1) null mutant mice. Furthermore, supernumerary teeth in both incisor and molar regions are exhibited by specificity protein 6 (Sp6) deficient mice and sclerostin domain containing 1 (Sostdc1) (also known as ectodin, Wise and USAG-1) null mutant mice.[10] Mice possessing conditional knockout of the adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene under the control of the human keratin 14 (K14) promoter also exhibited supernumerary teeth. This study indicated that the occurrence of supernumerary teeth by loss of Apc was through activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.[11] The normal number of teeth in mice is, however, less than that of humans, and their teeth are not replaced because they have only primary dentition. Therefore, mouse models may not be the most appropriate ones for determining the etiology of supernumerary teeth in humans. In the present study, we selected four Japanese families, Families A, B, C, and D. In three families (Families A, B and D), both first and second generations have supernumerary teeth. We do not know whether the first generation in Family C is affected. However, the second generation in Family C has impacted supernumerary teeth in the maxillary incisor area. Most affected individuals have one supernumerary tooth; however, II-2 in Family A has two (Figure 1a, b). The occurrence of supernumerary teeth in most of these families indicates an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance. All subjects were diagnosed by examining a panoramic radiograph or upper anterior occlusal radiographs and interviewing the patient about their medical and dental history. All subjects were free of any syndrome or congenital anomaly such as cleft lip or palate. All subjects provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Showa and Kanazawa University.
Figure 1

(a) Upper anterior occlusal radiograph of II-2 in Family A with two impacted supernumerary teeth in the maxillary incisor area. (b) Family pedigrees of Japanese individuals with supernumerary teeth. Squares and circles denote males and females, respectively. Filled symbols indicate affected individuals. The phenotype of the first generation in Family C is unknown.

Saliva samples were collected from 16 individuals (10 affected and 6 unaffected). DNA was extracted from the samples using Oragene DNA (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, Canada) and subjected to whole-exome sequencing. DNA samples (3 μg) were subjected to exome capture using the Sure-Select Human All Exon Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The captured DNA underwent high-throughput sequencing using the HiSeq2500 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). All prepared flow cells were run on the Illumina HiSeq2500 using paired-end 100-bp reads. Reads were mapped to the reference genome (UCSC hg19) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v.0.7.9.[12] BWA-generated SAM files were sorted and indexed using SAMtools v.0.1.18.[13] The files obtained in BAM format were analyzed using GATK v.2.7 following their best practice guidelines.[14] To perform gene annotation, we used the RefSeq gene database (build hg19),[15] while variant annotation was based on the dbSNP (dbSNP 135), the 1000 Genomes Project database,[16] and data of 1,208 Japanese individuals from the Human Genetic Variation database (HGVD) (http://www.genome.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/SnpDB/index.html). In all family samples, variants detected in exome sequencing data were further analyzed by performing three filtering steps based on different criteria. Rare variants with frequencies <3% in the Japanese population were selected from HGVD to obtain rare variants as potential candidates. Whole-exome sequencing identified 149 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and seven small insertions and deletions (indels) that co-segregated in Family A in the fully penetrant autosomal-dominant mode of inheritance. Moreover, 157 SNVs and seven indels co-segregated in Family B, 407 SNVs and 28 indels co-segregated in Family C, and 16 SNVs and four indels co-segregated in Family D. However, we did not identify any common gene variants in all four families. Three families (Families A, C, and D) all had variants in SCO-spondin (SSPO) (Table 1). It is known that SSPO plays a role in central nervous system development.[17,18] We detected 23 common gene variants in two families. Families A and B both had variants in EF-hand calcium binding domain 5 (EFCAB5), testis expressed 15 (TEX15), and tumor suppressor candidate 1 (TUSC1). Families A and C both had variants in absent in melanoma 1-like (AIM1L), cadherin 26 (CDH26), exocyst complex component 3-like 4 (EXOC3L4), family with sequence similarity 186 member A (FAM186A), FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 4 (FXYD4), polycystin 1 like 2 (PKD1L2), LOC100652824, and transketolase-like 1 (TKTL1). Families B and C both had variants in agrin (AGRN), ataxin 1 (ATXN1), chromosome 21 open reading frame 58 (C21orf58), complement factor B (CFB), Fanconi anemia complementation group E (FANCE), formin-like 1 (FMNL1), hemicentin 1 (HMCN1), immunoglobulin superfamily member 9B (IGSF9B), KIAA1614, MGA, MAX dimerization protein (MGA), phospholipase C eta 2 (PLCH2), and ring finger protein 207 (RNF207) (Table 2). Up to date, none of these genes are known to have a function in tooth development.
Table 1

Summary of candidate mutations in SSPO identified by whole-exome sequencing

 ChrPositionRefObsFunctionGeneExonic functionAAChange  HGVD1,000 gdbSNP135
Family A7149493577ATExonicSSPONonsynonymous SNVNM_198455c.A6653Tp.Q2218L0.021930.04rs73727613
Family C7149484985CAExonicSSPOStopgain SNVNM_198455c.C3740Ap.S1247X0.0226650.0041rs146309075
Family C7149504070GAExonicSSPONonsynonymous SNVNM_198455c.G8894Ap.C2965Y0.0216680.01rs140118386
Family D7149500107GAExonicSSPONonsynonymous SNVNM_198455c.G7733Ap.R2578H0.0041770 

Abbreviations: AAChange, amino acid change; dbSNP135, database single-nucleotide polymorphisms 135; HGVD, Human Genetic Variation Database; Obs, observed base; Ref, reference base; SNV, single-nucleotide variant; SSPO, SCO-spondin; 1000 g, 1000 Genomes Project database.

Table 2

Genes with variants detected in two families

GenePresence of gene variants in familes
 Family AFamily BFamily CFamily D
1 Absent in melanoma 1-like (AIM1L)  
2 Agrin (AGRN)  
3 Ataxin 1(ATXN1)  
4 Cadherin 26 (CDH26)  
5 Chromosome 21 open reading frame 58 (C21orf58)  
6 Complement factor B (CFB)  
7 EF-hand calcium binding domain 5 (EFCAB5)  
8 Exocyst complex component 3 like 4 (EXOC3L4)  
9 Family with sequence similarity 186 member A (FAM186A)  
10 Fanconi anemia complementation group E (FANCE)  
11 Formin like 1 (FMNL1)  
12 FXYD domain containing ion transport regulator 4 (FXYD4)  
13 Hemicentin 1 (HMCN1)  
14 Immunoglobulin superfamily member 9B (IGSF9B)  
15 KIAA1614  
16 LOC100652824  
17 MGA, MAX dimerization protein(MGA)  
18 Phospholipase C eta 2 (PLCH2)  
19 Polycystin 1 like 2 (PKD1L2)  
20 Ring finger protein 207 (RNF207)  
21 Testis expressed 15 (TEX15)  
22 Transketolase-like 1 (TKTL1)  
23 Tumor suppressor candidate 1 (TUSC1)  
This is the first study to demonstrate the genetic landscape in non-syndromic Japanese patients with impacted supernumerary teeth in the maxillary incisor area. Whole-exome sequencing is an effective strategy to elucidate the etiology of dental diseases, and our findings provide a basis for further exploration of the pathological mechanisms of supernumerary teeth.
  17 in total

Review 1.  SCO-spondin, a glycoprotein of the subcommissural organ/Reissner's fiber complex: evidence of a potent activity on neuronal development in primary cell cultures.

Authors:  A Meiniel
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Mutations involving the transcription factor CBFA1 cause cleidocranial dysplasia.

Authors:  S Mundlos; F Otto; C Mundlos; J B Mulliken; A S Aylsworth; S Albright; D Lindhout; W G Cole; W Henn; J H Knoll; M J Owen; R Mertelsmann; B U Zabel; B R Olsen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts.

Authors:  T Komori; H Yagi; S Nomura; A Yamaguchi; K Sasaki; K Deguchi; Y Shimizu; R T Bronson; Y H Gao; M Inada; M Sato; R Okamoto; Y Kitamura; S Yoshiki; T Kishimoto
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Cleidocranial dysplasia: clinical and molecular genetics.

Authors:  S Mundlos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Subcommissural organ/Reissner's fiber complex: characterization of SCO-spondin, a glycoprotein with potent activity on neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  S Gobron; I Creveaux; R Meiniel; R Didier; A Herbet; M Bamdad; F El Bitar; B Dastugue; A Meiniel
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 6.  Molecular genetics of supernumerary tooth formation.

Authors:  Xiu-Ping Wang; Jiabing Fan
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  Molecular genetics of tooth development.

Authors:  Marianna Bei
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Mark A DePristo; Eric Banks; Ryan Poplin; Kiran V Garimella; Jared R Maguire; Christopher Hartl; Anthony A Philippakis; Guillermo del Angel; Manuel A Rivas; Matt Hanna; Aaron McKenna; Tim J Fennell; Andrew M Kernytsky; Andrey Y Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Stacey B Gabriel; David Altshuler; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of supernumerary teeth and the associated molecular mechanism.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Fang Yu; Junjun Liu; Wenping Cai; Yumei Zhao; Shouliang Zhao; Shangfeng Liu
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Association of TUSC1 and DPF3 gene polymorphisms with male infertility.

Authors:  Youichi Sato; Chise Hasegawa; Atsushi Tajima; Shiari Nozawa; Miki Yoshiike; Eitetsue Koh; Jiro Kanaya; Mikio Namiki; Kiyomi Matsumiya; Akira Tsujimura; Kiyoshi Komatsu; Naoki Itoh; Jiro Eguchi; Aiko Yamauchi; Teruaki Iwamoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.412

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.