| Literature DB >> 28144258 |
Na Li1, Yumei Wang1, Lulu Yu1, Mei Song1, Lan Wang1, Chunpeng Ji1, Xueyi Wang1, Shouling Wu2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to study the long-term effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of stress from direct experience of an earthquake as a young person.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular disease; earthquake stress; long-term effect; risk factors
Year: 2016 PMID: 28144258 PMCID: PMC5206373 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2017.64716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Figure 1Enrollment, exclusion, and inclusion of Kailuan workers as study subjects
General information on workers
| Characteristic | Control group ( | Exposed group 1 ( | Exposed group 2 ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD [years] | 40.00 ±4.72 | 40.34 ±4.86 | 40.34 ±4.32 | 0.327 |
| Male, | 332 (80.39) | 254 (63.98) | 257 (66.58) | < 0.001 |
| Physical training, | 365 (88.38) | 340 (85.64) | 342 (88.6) | 0.373 |
| Junior high school education or above, | 148 (35.84) | 164 (41.31) | 123 (31.87) | 0.022 |
| Monthly family income ≥ 600 Yuan, | 256 (61.99) | 208 (52.39) | 194 (50.26) | 0.002 |
| Smoking, | 212 (51.33) | 200 (50.38) | 194 (50.26) | 0.945 |
| Drinking, | 276 (66.83) | 234 (58.94) | 240 (62.18) | 0.065 |
| History of family hypertension, | 115 (27.85) | 148 (37.28) | 105 (27.2) | 0.003 |
As defined in Materials.
P-values for comparison among control group, exposed group 1 and exposed group 2.
Comparison of cardiovascular disease-related factors between workers in exposed groups and controls
| Cardiovascular disease-related factors | Control group ( | Exposed group 1 ( | Exposed group 2 ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waistline [cm] | 83.48 ±10.71 | 83.31 ±10.66 | 84.14 ±10.58 | 0.661 |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 25.07 ±3.35 | 24.62 ±3.59 | 24.78 ±3.64 | 0.116 |
| RHR [bpm] | 72.06 ±9.45 | 73.64 ±10.13 | 74.54 ±10.79 | 0.003 |
| SBP [mm Hg] | 118.13 ±15.76 | 117.59 ±15.19 | 118.26 ±18.20 | 0.788 |
| DBP [mm Hg] | 78.10 ±9.47 | 77.57 ±9.07 | 77.62 ±10.47 | 0.727 |
| TC [mmol/l] | 4.83 ±0.98 | 5.01 ±0.97 | 5.05 ±0.86 | < 0.001 |
| LogTG | 1.40 ±1.06 | 1.51 ±1.25 | 1.43 ±1.07 | 0.900 |
| LDL-C [mmol/l] | 2.18 ±0.65 | 2.16 ±0.64 | 2.22 ±0.66 | 0.497 |
| HDL-C [mmol/l] | 1.51 ±0.53 | 1.52 ±0.52 | 1.54 ±0.52 | 0.762 |
| FBG [mmol/l] | 5.12 ±1.24 | 5.43 ±1.39 | 5.36 ±1.64 | < 0.001 |
Data are means ± SD. Abbreviations explained in Methods.
P-values for comparison among control group, exposed group 1 and exposed group 2.
Compared with group 1 p > 0.05.
Comparison of RHR, TC and FBG between workers in exposed and control groups, stratified by gender and age
| Cardiovascular disease-related factors | Female ( |
| Male ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | Exposed group 1 + 2 ( | Control group ( | Exposed group 1 + 2 ( | |||
| RHR, mean ± SD [bpm]: | ||||||
| Age < 40 | 74.06 ±10.75 | 73.53 ±9.79 | 0.795 | 72.35 ±9.25 | 73.95 ±9.432 | 0.129 |
| Age ≥ 40 | 72.60 ±9.12 | 74.65 ±12.21 | 0.230 | 71.35 ±9.38 | 74.07 ±10.38 | 0.002 |
| TC, mean ± SD [mmol/l]: | ||||||
| Age < 40 | 4.46 ±0.81 | 4.69 ±0.77 | 0.112 | 4.72 ±1.11 | 4.81 ±0.91 | 0.447 |
| Age ≥ 40 | 4.79 ±1.00 | 4.95 ±0.92 | 0.33 | 4.97 ±0.89 | 5.32 ±0.89 | < 0.001 |
| FBG, mean ± SD [mmol/l]: | ||||||
| Age < 40 | 5.00 ±0.61 | 5.02 ±0.53 | 0.857 | 5.04 ±0.71 | 5.10 ±0.87 | 0.437 |
| Age ≥ 40 | 5.17 ±0.54 | 5.39 ±1.44 | 0.116 | 5.19 ±1.65 | 5.70 ±1.96 | 0.002 |
Odds ratios (OR) of high-value RHR, TC and FBG for workers in exposed and control groups
| Cardiovascular disease-related factors | Group | Total | Female | Male | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR |
| OR |
| OR |
| ||
| RHR > 80 bpm | Control | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 1.450 (1.051–2.001) | 0.029 | 1.111 (0.551–2.239) | 0.769 | 1.605 (1.105–2.330) | 0.013 | |
| TC > 5.98 mmol/l | Control | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 1.493 (1.035–2.153) | 0.032 | 1.100 (0.426–2.845) | 0.843 | 1.581 (1.057–2.365) | 0.026 | |
| FBG > 6.1 mmol/l | Control | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Exposed | 1.594 (0.915–2.776) | 0.099 | 1.346 (0.279–6.494) | 0.711 | 1.842 (1.001–3.386) | 0.049 | |
OR were derived from a logistic analysis model adjusting for age, income, education, physical training, smoking and drinking.
Figure 2Effect of earthquake 30 years later on RHR, TC, and FBG of male workers age 18 or younger at time of earthquake
*P < 0.05 compared with control group.