Literature DB >> 28143885

Does First-Trimester Screening Modify the Natural History of Congenital Heart Disease? Analysis of Outcome of Regional Cardiac Screening at 2 Different Time Periods.

Hana Jicinska1, Pavel Vlasin2, Michal Jicinsky2, Ilga Grochova2, Viktor Tomek2, Julia Volaufova2, Jan Skovranek2, Jan Marek2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study analyzed the impact of first-trimester screening on the spectrum of congenital heart defects (CHDs) later in pregnancy and on the outcome of fetuses and children born alive with a CHD.
METHODS: The spectrum of CHDs, associated comorbidities, and outcome of fetuses, either diagnosed with a CHD in the first trimester (Group I, 127 fetuses) or only in the second-trimester screening (Group II, 344 fetuses), were analyzed retrospectively between 2007 and 2013. Second-trimester fetuses diagnosed with a CHD between 2007 and 2013 were also compared with Group III (532 fetuses diagnosed with a CHD in the second trimester from 1996 to 2001, the period before first-trimester screening was introduced).
RESULTS: The spectrum of CHDs diagnosed in the first and second trimesters in the same time period differed significantly, with a greater number of comorbidities (P<0.0001), CHDs with univentricular outcome (P<0.0001), intrauterine deaths (P=0.01), and terminations of pregnancy (P<0.0001) in Group I compared with Group II. In Group III, significantly more cases of CHDs with univentricular outcome (P<0.0001), intrauterine demise (P=0.036), and early termination (P<0.0001) were identified compared with fetuses diagnosed with CHDs in the second trimester between 2007 and 2013. The spectrum of CHDs seen in the second-trimester groups differed after first-trimester screening was implemented.
CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening had a significant impact on the spectrum of CHDs and the outcomes of pregnancies with CHDs diagnosed in the second trimester. Early detection of severe forms of CHDs and significant comorbidities resulted in an increased pregnancy termination rate in the first trimester.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital heart defects; echocardiography; epidemiology; first-trimester screening; prenatal cardiology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28143885     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

Review 1.  Fetal programming as a predictor of adult health or disease: the need to reevaluate fetal heart function.

Authors:  Joana O Miranda; Carla Ramalho; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; José Carlos Areias
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Live-Born Major Congenital Heart Disease in Denmark: Incidence, Detection Rate, and Termination of Pregnancy Rate From 1996 to 2013.

Authors:  Rebekka Lytzen; Niels Vejlstrup; Jesper Bjerre; Olav Bjørn Petersen; Stine Leenskjold; James Keith Dodd; Finn Stener Jørgensen; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Efficacy of Antenatal Ultrasound Examination in Diagnosis of Congenital Cardiac Anomalies in an Unselected Population: Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  N D Varunashree; Ravi Shankar; Preethi Navaneethan; Manish Kumar; Santosh Joseph Benjamin; Smitha Elizabeth Jacob; Bijesh Yadav; Swati Rathore
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-03

4.  Diagnosis of Interventional Transvaginal Maternal Diseases Based on Color Doppler Ultrasound.

Authors:  Canliang Wen; Lan Huang; Hongye Jiang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Major heart defects: the diagnostic evaluations of first-year-olds.

Authors:  Jan Pavlicek; Eva Klaskova; Sabina Kapralova; Alzbeta Moravova Palatova; Alicja Piegzova; Richard Spacek; Tomas Gruszka
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  The diagnostic value of the early extended fetal heart examination at 13 to 14 weeks gestational age in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Baoying Ye; Yi Wu; Jiong Chen; Yu Yang; Jianmei Niu; Hui Wang; Yanlin Wang; Weiwei Cheng
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-11

Review 7.  Harnessing the Power of Stem Cell Models to Study Shared Genetic Variants in Congenital Heart Diseases and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Authors:  Xuyao Chang; Mingxia Gu; Jason Tchieu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Incidence and mortality trend of congenital heart disease at the global, regional, and national level, 1990-2017.

Authors:  Weiliang Wu; Jinxian He; Xiaobo Shao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  EDUCATIONAL SERIES IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey E Hunter; Anna N Seale
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-16

10.  Environmental and Socioeconomic Factors Influence the Live-Born Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease: A Population-Based Study in California.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Rebecca J Baer; Christina D Chambers; Mary E Norton; Satish Rajagopal; Kelli K Ryckman; Anita Moon-Grady; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Martina A Steurer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.