| Literature DB >> 28143561 |
Fu-Kai Zhang1, Xiao-Xuan Zhang1, Hany M Elsheikha2, Jun-Jun He1, Zhao-An Sheng3, Wen-Bin Zheng1, Jian-Gang Ma1, Wei-Yi Huang3, Ai-Jiang Guo4, Xing-Quan Zhu5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fasciola gigantica, the tropical liver fluke, infects buffaloes in Asian and African countries and causes significant economic losses and poses public health threat in these countries. However, little is known of the transcriptional response of buffaloes to infection with F. gigantica. The objective of the present study was to perform the first transcriptomic analysis of buffalo liver infected by F. gigantica. Understanding the mechanisms that underpin F. gigantica infection in buffaloes will contribute to our ability to control this parasite.Entities:
Keywords: Fasciola gigantica; Immunomodulation; RNA-sequencing; Transcriptome; Water buffalo
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28143561 PMCID: PMC5286860 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-1990-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Primers used in the quantitative RT-PCR in the present study
| Primer name | Primer sequence (5' to 3') | Length of qPCR products (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| CYTP450F | AGCAGCAGACAACATCAACCA | 122 |
| CYTP450R | CAATCGTCCTCTTCCCCATC | |
| IL7RF | CAGAGGAGAGTGAGAAGCAGAGG | 275 |
| IL7RR | GGGTTGGAATGGAAATGGAG | |
| NKRF | GCAATGTCAGCAATCAAGTCAG | 174 |
| NKRR | TCCTCTTCTTCCTCCACACACA | |
| IL1R2F | TGTGAGGGGAACTCGCTTACTC | 105 |
| IL1R2R | GTGATGTTGTATTGCCTGCCTTT | |
| BUT-LF | AAGAGAGAGCTTGCCAGAAGGA | 143 |
| BUT-LR | GATAAGACGAGGTTGGGGTGAG | |
| IP6K3F | CACGGCAGCAGTGTCTTCA | 94 |
| IP6K3R | CATCGTAGGTGGTGTGTTCATTC | |
| CD1EF | TTCCAGCCAAATCACAGACAA | 133 |
| CD1ER | TCACTTCCCCTCCACTTCTCC | |
| CTSHF | GCTTCAGTCACCCAACTCCAC | 118 |
| CTSHR | ATACCAGCCAGCATCCCTACA | |
| SOD3F | GACTGCCTCCTCTCTGCCTTT | 150 |
| SOD3R | TGTCCCCAGCAACTCTTTTC | |
| NCF4F | CTGTTTCCTCGCCTTGTTCC | 273 |
| NCF4R | CCTCCCTTCACCGCTTACTTAC | |
| βF | GGACTTCGAGCAGGAGATGG | 138 |
| βR | AGGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAGA | |
| b561F | GTATGTACCGAGGCGGCATT | 148 |
| b561R | ACTTTGGTGGTGCGTTTGG |
Fig. 1Volcano map of the differentially expressed genes between infected and control buffaloes. Significantly differentially expressed genes are shown as red (up) or green (down) dots. No significant difference between the expressions of genes is indicated by blue dots. Ordinate represents the magnitude of gene expression changes. The x-axis represents the value of log2(fold change) and the y-axis shows the value of -log10(pval). a, b and c represent differentially expressed genes at 3, 42 and 70 days post-infection, respectively
Fig. 2Verification of the gene expression by qRT-PCR. Eleven genes were selected randomly for validation of the RNA-seq data. Data of RNA-seq verified by qRT-PCR at 3 (a), 42 (b) and 70 (c) days post-infection
Fig. 3Venn diagram showing the overlap of the differentially expressed genes between Fasciola gigantica-infected liver sample groups at 3 (a), 42 (b) and 70 (c) days post-infection. Transcripts that are common to multiple time points are shown by the overlap
Fig. 4Differentially expressed GO terms. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were classified into three main categories: molecular function, cellular component and biological process. The identified functions and the corresponding numbers of DEGs for each GO category are shown. a Top 30 DE molecular function, cellular component and biological process in A2T (infected) vs A2C (control) at 3 dpi. b Top 30 DE molecular function and biological process in A5T (infected) vs A5C (control) at 42 dpi. c Top 30 DE molecular function, cellular component and biological process in A6T (infected) vs A6C (control) at 70 dpi
Fig. 5Statistics of KEGG pathway enrichment. The x-axis shows the enrichment factor; the y-axis corresponds to KEGG Pathway. The color of the dot represents q value and size of the dot represents the number of DEGs mapped to the reference pathways. a, b and c represent the top 20 statistics of KEGG pathway enrichment for DEGs observed at 3, 42 and 70 dpi, respectively
Fig. 6Heatmap of the differentially expressed (DE) transcription factors. a, b and c are differentially expressed transcription factors at 3, 42 and 70 dpi, respectively. The red (up) and green (down) dots represent the significantly differential expressed transcripts; the black represents the transcripts whose expression levels did not reach statistical significance